Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Brian Main, J. Johnston (1993)
Remuneration Committees and Corporate GovernanceAccounting and Business Research, 23
M. Conyon, P. Gregg (1994)
Pay at the Top: A Study of the Sensitivity of Top Director Remuneration to Company Specific ShocksNational Institute Economic Review, 149
A. Cosh, A. Hughes (1987)
The anatomy of corporate control: directors, shareholders and executive remuneration in giant US and UK corporationsCambridge Journal of Economics, 11
Sir Cadbury (1993)
Thoughts on Corporate GovernanceCorporate Governance: An International Review, 1
T. Jenkinson, C. Mayer (1992)
THE ASSESSMENT:CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE CONTROLOxford Review of Economic Policy, 8
E. Fama (1980)
Agency Problems and the Theory of the FirmJournal of Political Economy, 88
P. Gregg, S. Machin, Stefan Szymanski (1993)
The Disappearing Relationship Between Directors' Pay and Corporate PerformanceBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 31
P. Gregg, Anthony Yates (1991)
Changes in Wage-setting Arrangements and Trade Union Presence in the 1980sBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 29
S. Rosen (1990)
Contracts and the Market for ExecutivesNBER Working Paper Series
Sanford Grossman, O. Hart (1983)
AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEMEconometrica, 51
Ellen Schneider-Lenné (1993)
The Governance of Good BusinessBusiness Strategy Review, 4
Main Main (1993)
Pay in the Boardroom: Practices and ProceduresPersonnel Review
In the UK, recently, there has been an intense debate about what constitutes good corporate governance. This paper presents the results of a retrospective postal survey into the nature of corporate governance structures in UK companies. The objective of this paper is to isolate the extent to which key corporate governance innovations are being adopted in the boardrooms of UK companies. The main findings can be summarised as follows: (i) 77 per cent of the sample of quoted companies separated the role of chief executive officer and chairman in 1993 compared to 57 per cent in 1988; (ii) 94 per cent of quoted companies operated remuneration committees in 1993 as compared to 54 per cent in 1988; (iii) the incidence of audit committees among companies has doubled between 1988 and 1993 whilst the incidence of nomination committees has trebled; (iv) in apparent contradiction of the Institutional Shareholders’ Committee recommendation, of those companies that operated remuneration committees in 1993, 40 per cent had the top executive director as a committee member. Overall the picture that emerges is of radical change in governance innovation since the late 1980s.
Corporate Governance – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.