Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sex, Dominance, and Microhabitat use in Wintering Black‐Capped Chickadees: A Field Experiment

Sex, Dominance, and Microhabitat use in Wintering Black‐Capped Chickadees: A Field Experiment I studied foraging patterns of Black—capped Chickadees (Parus articapillus) wintering in flocks in poplar forests of central Alberta, Canada. Females exploited highest and outermost tree parts, while males (which socially dominate females) foraged low and close to trunks. Females spent more time probing and found fewer prey per probe than males, but both sexes had similar feeding rates. I temporarily removed all eight males from three flocks, females foraged lower and closer to trunks than in three control flocks. Experimental females spent less time probing than controls, but had similar feeding rates. When captive males were released, they returned to their flock and experimental females shifted back to their initial foraging behavior. The results show that sex—specific foraging patterns in this population were affected by avoidance by females of microhabitats used mostly by dominant males. I suggest that predator avoidance makes the tree parts exploited by males more profitable. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecology Wiley

Sex, Dominance, and Microhabitat use in Wintering Black‐Capped Chickadees: A Field Experiment

Ecology , Volume 70 (3) – Jun 1, 1989

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/sex-dominance-and-microhabitat-use-in-wintering-black-capped-nfi8RBUauB

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
"© Society for Community Research and Action"
ISSN
0012-9658
eISSN
1939-9170
DOI
10.2307/1940215
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

I studied foraging patterns of Black—capped Chickadees (Parus articapillus) wintering in flocks in poplar forests of central Alberta, Canada. Females exploited highest and outermost tree parts, while males (which socially dominate females) foraged low and close to trunks. Females spent more time probing and found fewer prey per probe than males, but both sexes had similar feeding rates. I temporarily removed all eight males from three flocks, females foraged lower and closer to trunks than in three control flocks. Experimental females spent less time probing than controls, but had similar feeding rates. When captive males were released, they returned to their flock and experimental females shifted back to their initial foraging behavior. The results show that sex—specific foraging patterns in this population were affected by avoidance by females of microhabitats used mostly by dominant males. I suggest that predator avoidance makes the tree parts exploited by males more profitable.

Journal

EcologyWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1989

There are no references for this article.