Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Aung, Han Zheng, Mojisola Erdt, Ashley Aw, Sei-Ching Sin, Y. Theng (2019)
Investigating familiarity and usage of traditional metrics and altmetricsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70
Daniel Hook, Simon Porter, C. Herzog (2018)
Dimensions: Building Context for Search and EvaluationFrontiers Res. Metrics Anal., 3
Saeed-Ul Hassan, Mubashir Imran, U. Gillani, Naif Aljohani, T. Bowman, F. Didegah (2017)
Measuring social media activity of scientific literature: an exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel altmetrics big dataScientometrics, 113
R. Haunschild, L. Bornmann (2016)
How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric dataScientometrics, 110
H. Akoğlu (2018)
User's guide to correlation coefficientsTurkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18
Fei Shu, W. Quan, Bikun Chen, Junping Qiu, Cassidy Sugimoto, V. Larivière (2019)
The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure systemScientometrics, 122
Manika Lamba (2020)
Research productivity of health care policy faculty: a cohort study of Harvard Medical SchoolScientometrics, 124
M. Thelwall (2018)
Dimensions: A Competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?ArXiv, abs/1803.07525
G. Eysenbach (2011)
Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific ImpactJournal of Medical Internet Research, 13
A. Barakat, Nayef Nimri, Mohamed Shokr, Dhruv Mahtta, Hend Mansoor, A. Masri, I. Elgendy (2019)
Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score and Citations for High-Impact General Medicine Journals: a Cross-sectional StudyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 34
R. Haunschild, L. Bornmann (2016)
Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessmentJ. Informetrics, 10
Ali Ouchi, M. Saberi, Nasim Ansari, Leila Hashempour, Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam (2019)
Do altmetrics correlate with citations? A study based on the 1,000 most-cited articles, 47
L. Bornmann, R. Haunschild (2016)
How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter IndexScientometrics, 107
M. Thelwall (2019)
Mendeley reader counts for US computer science conference papers and journal articlesQuantitative Science Studies, 1
Wen-hua Huang, Peiling Wang, Qiang Wu (2018)
A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journalsPLoS ONE, 13
S. Haustein, V. Larivière, M. Thelwall, D. Amyot, Isabella Peters (2014)
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?it - Information Technology, 56
J. Ortega (2018)
Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event DataScientometrics, 116
R. Costas, Zohreh Zahedi, P. Wouters (2014)
Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspectiveJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
K. Aduku, M. Thelwall, K. Kousha (2017)
Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineeringScientometrics, 112
M. Thelwall (2017)
Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields?Scientometrics, 113
Wei Jeng, Daqing He, Jiepu Jiang (2014)
User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on MendeleyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
(2017)
And now for something completely different: the congruence of the Altmetric attention score’s structure between different article group
Feiheng Luo, Aixin Sun, Mojisola Erdt, Aravind Raamkumar, Y. Theng (2017)
Exploring prestigious citations sourced from top universities in bibliometrics and altmetrics: a case study in the computer science disciplineScientometrics, 114
Xi Zhang, Xianhai Wang, Hongke Zhao, P. Pablos, Yongqiang Sun, Hui Xiong (2019)
An effectiveness analysis of altmetrics indices for different levels of artificial intelligence publicationsScientometrics, 119
K. Holmberg, H. Park (2018)
An altmetric investigation of the online visibility of South Korea-based scientific journalsScientometrics, 117
Zohreh Zahedi, S. Haustein (2017)
On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publicationsArXiv, abs/1712.08637
Bhaskar Mukherjee, Siniša Subotić, A. Chaubey (2017)
And now for something completely different: the congruence of the Altmetric Attention Score’s structure between different article groupsScientometrics, 114
Ehsan Mohammadi, M. Thelwall, K. Kousha (2016)
Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivationsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67
(2019)
List of Central universities
(2020)
Clarivate analytics
Social interaction applications and reference tools are actively used by researchers to share and manage their research publications. Thus, this paper aims to determine the scholarly impact of selected Indian central universities.Design/methodology/approachThis study analyzed 669 articles having both Dimensions citations and Altmetric attention scores published by 35 Indian central universities for 4 subfields of Computer Science using Altmetric Explorer. This paper determined each university’s contribution in the studied subfields of Computer Science and the correlation among Altmetric attention score (aggregated and individual), Dimensions citation, and Mendeley readership counts for all 669 articles and stratified percentile sets of top 25%, and top 50% of the overall number of articles.FindingsThe findings showed that Jawaharlal Nehru University had the maximum Altmetric attention score, Banaras Hindu University received the maximum Dimensions citation, and University of Hyderabad (UoH) received the maximum number of Mendeley readers. Each central university was examined individually and then ranked based on their median values of Dimensions citations and Altmetric attention scores. Further, Twitter had the maximum Altmetric coverage, followed by Google+, Patent and Facebook for the retrieved articles. A significant strong positive correlation was observed between the Dimensions citation and Mendeley readership counts for all the three categories.Research limitations/implicationsBoth Altmetric attention scores and Dimensions citations can help funding agencies to assess and evaluate the research productivity of these universities, thus, making important decisions such as increasing, decreasing, re-distributing their funds.Originality/valueThe current body of research is focused mostly on relationships between citations and individual Altmetric indicators predominantly. For most of the studies, the citations were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science or Google Scholar database. It was observed that by far, no study had examined the relationship between citations retrieved from Dimensions database, Altmetrics scores (both aggregated and individual) and Mendeley readership counts.
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 28, 2021
Keywords: Performance measurement; Scholarly communication; Altmetrics; Comparative analysis; Research evaluation; Scientometrics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.