Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Brian Haig (2018)
Exploratory Data AnalysisMathematical Statistics with Resampling and R
C. Mason, R. Bryant (1975)
Periphyton production and grazing by chironomids in Alderfen Broad, NorfolkFreshwater Biology, 5
G. Capriulo, David Lints, M. LeWinter (1990)
Ingestion rate and body size in phagotrophic organismsCanadian Journal of Zoology, 68
B. Cuker (1983)
Grazing and nutrient interactions in controlling the activity and composition of the epilithic algal community of an arctic lake1Limnology and Oceanography, 28
R. Hunter (1980)
Effects of grazing on the quantity and quality of freshwater AufwuchsHydrobiologia, 69
(1979)
Determinants of the chemical composition of periphytic detrital aggregate in a tropical lake (Lake Valensia, Venezuela)
N. Tuchman, R. Stevenson (1991)
Effects of Selective Grazing by Snails on Benthic Algal SuccessionJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 10
G. Lamberti, A. Steinman (1993)
Research in Artificial Streams: Applications, Uses, and AbusesJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 12
G. Lamberti, J. Feminella, V. Resh (1987)
Herbivory and intraspecific competition in a stream caddisfly populationOecologia, 73
M. Murphy (1984)
Primary production and grazing in freshwater and intertidal reaches of a coastal stream, Southeast AlaskaLimnology and Oceanography, 29
P. Mulholland, A. Steinman, A. Palumbo, D. DeAngelis, Terry Flum (1991)
Influence of Nutrients and Grazing on the Response of Stream Periphyton Communities to a Scour DisturbanceJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 10
E. Eichenberger, A. Schlatter (1978)
Effect of herbivorous insects on the production of benthic algal vegetation in outdoor channels: With 4 figures and 1 table in the text, 20
David Hart (1987)
Experimental studies of exploitative competition in a grazing stream insectOecologia, 73
H. Cyr, M. Pace (1993)
Allometric Theory: Extrapolations from Individuals to CommunitiesEcology, 74
J. Jacoby (1985)
Grazing Effects on Periphyton by Theodoxus fluviatilis (Gastropoda) in a Lowland StreamJournal of Freshwater Ecology, 3
D. Kesler (1981)
Grazing rate determination of Corynoneura scutellata Winnertz (Chironomidae: Diptera)Hydrobiologia, 80
A. Steinman (1991)
EFFECTS OF HERBIVORE SIZE AND HUNGER LEVEL ON PERIPHYTON COMMUNITIES 1Journal of Phycology, 27
R. Peters, J. Downing (1984)
Empirical analysis of zooplankton filtering and feeding rates1Limnology and Oceanography, 29
W. Hill, A. Knight (1988)
Concurrent grazing effects of two stream insects on periphyton1Limnology and Oceanography, 33
A. Cattaneo (1983)
Grazing on epiphytes1Limnology and Oceanography, 28
A. Stewart (1987)
Responses of stream algae to grazing minnows and nutrients: a field test for interactionsOecologia, 75
S. Gresens, R. Lowe (1994)
Periphyton Patch Preference in Grazing Chironomid LarvaeJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 13
(1979)
The growth and species communities of the attached algae in a river system in Central Finland
(1972)
Transformation of energy by an aquatic herbivore (Stenonema pulchellum) Ephemeroptera
C. Mcintire, H. Phinney (1965)
Laboratory Studies of Periphyton Production and Community Metabolism in Lotic EnvironmentsEcological Monographs, 35
L. Smock (1980)
Relationships between body size and biomass of aquatic insectsFreshwater Biology, 10
C. Malone, D. Nelson (1969)
Feeding Rates of Freshwater Snails (Goniobasis Clavaeformis) determined with CobaltEcology, 50
J. Capblanco, M. Cassan (1979)
Etude du périphyton d'une rivière polluée (l'Agout). I. Structure et développement des communautés sur substrats artificielsAnnales De Limnologie-international Journal of Limnology, 15
(1980)
The effects of physical variables on freshwater production ; analysis based on model
J. Eckblad (1971)
Weight-Length Regression Models for Three Aquatic Gastropod PopulationsAmerican Midland Naturalist, 85
(1990)
autds sur substrats artificiels
J. Rounick, M. Winterbourn (1983)
The formation, structure and utilization of stone surface organic layers in two New Zealand streamsFreshwater Biology, 13
H. Gons (1982)
Structural and functional characteristics of epiphyton and epipelon in relation to their distribution in Lake VechtenHydrobiologia, 95
G. Lamberti, S. Gregory, C. Hawkins, R. Wildman, L. Ashkenas, D. DeNicola (1992)
Plant—herbivore interactions in streams near Mount St HelensFreshwater Biology, 27
P. Eloranta (1982)
Periphyton growth and diatom community structure in a cooling water pondHydrobiologia, 96
W. Sumner (1979)
Grazer-periphyton interactions in laboratory streams
(1983)
Grazing on epiphytes. Limnol Oceanogr 28:124-132
T. Kairesalo, Irma Koskimies (1987)
Grazing by oligochaetes and snails on epiphytesFreshwater Biology, 17
G. Lamberti, L. Ashkenas, S. Gregory, A. Steinman (1987)
Effects of Three Herbivores on Periphyton Communities in Laboratory StreamsJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 6
(1977)
The effects of grazing by Physid and Planorbid freshwater snails on periphyton
D. Mccullough, G. Minshall, C. Cushing (1979)
Bioenergetics of a stream “collector” organism, Tricorythodes minutus (Insecta: Ephemeroptera)1,2Limnology and Oceanography, 24
R. Castenholz (1961)
The Effect of Grazing on Marine Littoral Diatom PopulationsEcology, 42
E. Meyer (1989)
The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebratesArchiv für Hydrobiologie
D. Kesler (1981)
Periphyton grazing by Amnicolalimosa: An enclosure-exclosure experimentJournal of Freshwater Ecology, 1
(1980)
The effects of physical variables on freshwater production; analysis based on model. In: Le Cren ED, Lowe-McConnell RH (eds) The functioning of freshwater ecosystems (IBP Handbook 22)
J. Feminella, M. Power, V. Resh (1989)
Periphyton responses to invertebrate grazing and riparian canopy in three northern California coastal streamsFreshwater Biology, 22
M. Dickman (1968)
The Effect of Grazing by Tadpoles on the Structure of a Periphyton CommunityEcology, 49
G. Lamberti, Stanley Gregory, L. Ashkenas, Alan Steinman, C. Mcintire (1989)
Productive Capacity of Periphyton as a Determinant of Plant‐Herbivore Interactions in StreamsEcology, 70
W. Hill, A. Knight (1987)
Experimental Analysis of the Grazing Interaction Between a Mayfly and Stream Algae.Ecology, 68 6
L. Cammen (2004)
Ingestion rate: An empirical model for aquatic deposit feeders and detritivoresOecologia, 44
J. Jacoby (1987)
Alterations in periphyton characteristics due to grazing in a Cascade foothill streamFreshwater Biology, 18
W. Hill, H. Boston, A. Steinman (1992)
Grazers and Nutrients Simultaneously Limit Lotic Primary ProductivityCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49
Peter Calow, C. Fletcher (2004)
A new radiotracer technique involving 14C and 51Cr, for estimating the assimilation efficiencies of aquatic, primary consumersOecologia, 9
K. Cummins, J. Wuycheck (1971)
Caloric equivalents for investigations in ecological energetics, 18
A. Steinman, C. Mcintire, S. Gregory, G. Lamberti, L. Ashkenas (1987)
Effects of Herbivore Type and Density on Taxonomic Structure and Physiognomy of Algal Assemblages in Laboratory StreamsJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 6
G. Lakatos (1978)
Comparative analysis of biotecton periphyton samples collected from natural substrate in waters of different trophic states, 24
To establish a general model for the removal rate of periphyton by grazers, we identified 27 publications in which removal rates could be estimated from grazer enclosure or exclosure experiments. When all the measurements obtained under different experimental conditions were extracted, these publications provided 107 data points. Multiple regression of these data showed that periphyton removal rate increased significantly with grazer body mass and food availability, and decreased with grazer crowding. Grazer body mass explained 65% of the variation, while crowding and food availability explained 7 and 6% respectively. Except for the significantly lower removal rate of amphibians, neither taxon of the grazer nor algal composition significantly affected removal rate. Experiments in the laboratory and in outdoor channels tended to give higher removal rates than experiments performed in streams or lakes. A comparison with previous allometric equations predicting the ingestion rate of other invertebrate guilds, and with experiments in which periphyton ingestion rate was measured as incorporation of labelled food, indicated that a large portion of periphyton is removed by the activity of the grazer rather than by direct ingestion. These results could be utilized to predict the impact of grazing on periphyton biomass.
Oecologia – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.