Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Ziegler (1987)
Environmental Policy in the USSR
M. Douglas (1966)
Purity and Danger
M. Steger, Stephanie Witt (1989)
Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: a Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the U.SPolitical Research Quarterly, 42
D. Albrecht, G. Bultena, E. Hoiberg (1982)
MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM SCALEThe Journal of Environmental Education, 13
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
T. Heberlein, J. Black (1981)
Cognitive Consistency and Environmental ActionEnvironment and Behavior, 13
M. Edgell, D. Nowell (1989)
The new environmental paradigm scale: Wildlife and environmental beliefs in British ColumbiaSociety & Natural Resources, 2
R. Inglehart (2018)
Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society
R. Dunlap, Liere K.D.V. (1978)
THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS, 9
P. Stern (1992)
Psychological dimensions of global environmental change.Annual Review of Psychology, 43
F. Noe, R. Snow (1990)
The new environmental paradigm and further scale analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education, 21
M. Maloney, M. Ward, G. Braucht (1975)
A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge.American Psychologist, 30
K. Liere, R. Dunlap (1980)
The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical EvidencePublic Opinion Quarterly, 44
D. Albrecht (1982)
The New Environmental Paradigm Scale.The Journal of Environmental Education, 13
R. Kuhn, E. Jackson (1989)
Stability of Factor Structures in the Measurement of Public Environmental AttitudesThe Journal of Environmental Education, 20
W. Catton, R. Dunlap (1980)
A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant SociologyAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 24
R. Dunlap (1980)
Paradigmatic Change in Social ScienceAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 24
Luke Martell (1994)
The Sustainable Society
R. Inglehart (1977)
The Silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publicsForeign Affairs, 56
D. Dillman (1979)
Mail and telephone surveys : the total design methodSocial Forces, 11
A. Maslow (1954)
Motivation and Personality
Jeffrey Hahn (1991)
Continuity and Change in Russian Political CultureBritish Journal of Political Science, 21
M. Agar, M. Douglas, A. Wildavsky (1983)
Risk and CultureAnthropological Quarterly, 56
Karl Dake (1992)
Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of RiskJournal of Social Issues, 48
T. Kuhn, David Hawkins (1963)
The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsAmerican Journal of Physics, 31
Ian Barbour (1980)
Technology, environment, and human values
F. Buttel (1987)
NEW DIRECTIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGYReview of Sociology, 13
R. Dunlap, K. Liere (1978)
The “New Environmental Paradigm”The Journal of Environmental Education, 40
W. Catton, David Gray, R. Borden, Russell Weigel (1985)
Ecological Beliefs and Behaviors: Assessment and Change
John Anderson (1980)
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
J. Pierce, N. Lovrich, Taketsugu Tsurutani, Takematsu Abe (1987)
Culture, Politics and Mass Publics: Traditional and Modern Supporters of The New Environmental Paradigm In Japan and the United StatesThe Journal of Politics, 49
M. Rokeach (1974)
The Nature Of Human Values
F. Kluckhohn, F. Strodtbeck (1961)
Variations in value orientations.American Journal of Psychology, 76
J. Geller, Paul Lasley (1985)
The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: A ReexaminationThe Journal of Environmental Education, 17
M. Maloney, M. Ward (1973)
Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge.American Psychologist, 28
Joachim Schahn, Erwin Holzer (1990)
Studies of Individual Environmental ConcernEnvironment and Behavior, 22
This article compares environmental beliefs and attitudes in Estonia, Latvia, and Sweden. It is based on interviews in Tartu, Estonia, and Riga, Latvia, and on an extract from a postal survey in the county of Östergötland, Sweden. Four scales were used in the study: the new environmental paradigm (NEP) scale, a scale to measure support for science and technology, a scale to measure postmaterial values, and a scale to measure concern for local environmental problems. The expected correlations between support for the NEP, distrust of science and technology, postmaterial values, and concern for environmental conditions were only partially supported by the results of the Swedish study, and, in the case of the Baltic samples, not at all. A fourth explanatory factor—that environmental concern can be based either on direct personal experience of the environment, or on symbolic general representations of reported global problems-is used to explain these discrepancies.
Environment and Behavior – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.