Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Gleason, A. Cronquist (1963)
Gleason's Flora Abridged. (Biological and Medical Sciences: Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada)Science
B. Atwell, M. Veerkamp, B. Stuiver, P. Kuiper (1980)
The uptake of phosphate by Carex species from oligotrophic to eutrophic swamp habitatsPhysiologia Plantarum, 49
C. Richardson (1985)
Mechanisms Controlling Phosphorus Retention Capacity in Freshwater WetlandsScience, 228
N. Martin, A. Holding (1978)
Nutrient Availability and Other Factors Limiting Microbial Activity in the Blanket Peat
G. Rhee (1972)
COMPETITION BETWEEN AN ALGA AND AN AQUATIC BACTERIUM FOR PHOSPHATE1Limnology and Oceanography, 17
W. Saunders (1965)
Phosphate retention by New Zealand soils and its relationship to free sesquioxides, organic matter, and other soil propertiesNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 8
L. Sommers, D. Nelson, L. Owens, M. Floyd (1977)
Phosphorus Dynamics In Soils Irrigated With Municipal Wastewater
A. McLean, E. Tisdale (1960)
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF NATIVE FORAGE PLANTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA IN RELATION TO GRAZING PRACTICESCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 40
F. Chapin, R. Barsdate, D. Barèl (1978)
Phosphorus cycling in Alaskan coastal tundra: a hypothesis for the regulation of nutrient cyclingOikos, 31
James Martin (1950)
USE OF ACID, ROSE BENGAL, AND STREPTOMYCIN IN THE PLATE METHOD FOR ESTIMATING SOIL FUNGISoil Science, 69
A. Greenberg, R. Trussell, L. Clesceri (1988)
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition
D. Tilton, R. Kadlec (1979)
The Utilization of a Fresh‐Water Wetland for Nutrient Removal from Secondarily Treated Waste Water EffluentJournal of Environmental Quality, 8
N. Barrow (1978)
The description of phosphate adsorption curvesEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 29
R. Johannes (1965)
INFLUENCE OF MARINE PROTOZOA ON NUTRIENT REGENERATION1Limnology and Oceanography, 10
D. Schlessinger, G. Medoff (1975)
Streptomycin, Dihydrostreptomycin, and the Gentamicins
R. Fox, E. Kamprath (1971)
Adsorption and Leaching of P in Acid Organic Soils and High Organic Matter Sand1Soil Science Society of America Journal, 35
E. Gorham, Maureen Somers (1973)
Seasonal changes in the standing crop of two montane sedgesBotany, 51
W. Patrick, K. Reddy (1976)
Nitrification-Denitrification Reactions in Flooded Soils and Water Bottoms: Dependence on Oxygen Supply and Ammonium DiffusionJournal of Environmental Quality, 5
P. Voth, E. Voss (1972)
Michigan Flora. Part I. Gymnosperms and MonocotsThe Bryologist, 76
C. Richardson, Benedict Schweglei (1986)
ALGAL BIOASSAY AND GROSS PRODUCTIVITY EXPERIMENTS USING SEWAGE EFFLUENT IN A MICHIGAN WETLANDJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 22
R. Bray, L. Kurtz (1945)
DETERMINATION OF TOTAL, ORGANIC, AND AVAILABLE FORMS OF PHOSPHORUS IN SOILSSoil Science, 59
R. Barsdate (1974)
Phosphorus cycle of model ecosystems : significance for decomposer food chains and effect of bacterial grazersOikos, 25
R. Terry, R. Tate (1980)
DENITRIFICATION AS A PATHWAY FOR NITRATE REMOVAL FROM ORGANIC SOILSSoil Science, 129
F. Rigler (1956)
A Tracer Study of the Phosphorus Cycle in Lake WaterEcology, 37
A. Hasler (1975)
Coupling of Land and Water Systems
S. Cuttle (1983)
Chemical properties of upland peats influencing the retention of phosphate and potassium ionsEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 34
H. Ingram (1978)
SOIL LAYERS IN MIRES: FUNCTION AND TERMINOLOGYEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 29
F. Hayes, J. Phillips (1958)
Lake Water and SedimentLimnology and Oceanography, 3
M. Veerkamp, W. Corré, B. Atwell, P. Kuiper (1980)
Growth rate and phosphate utilization of some Carex species from a range of oligotrophic to eutrophic swamp habitatsPhysiologia Plantarum, 50
H. Scheffé (1960)
The Analysis of Variance
E. Verry (1975)
Streamflow Chemistry and Nutrient Yields from Upland‐Peatland Watersheds in MinnesotaEcology, 56
R. Sokal, F. Rohlf, Freeman, Co. (1969)
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
W. Pringle, A. Ryswyk (1965)
RESPONSE OF WATER SEDGE IN THE GROWTH ROOM TO FERTILIZER AND TEMPERATURE TREATMENTSCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 45
M. Bartlett, L. Brown, N. Hanes, N. Nickerson (1979)
Denitrification in Freshwater Wetland SoilJournal of Environmental Quality, 8
H. Bouwer, J. Lance, R. Rice (1971)
Renovating Sewage Effluent by Ground-Water Recharge
P. Bloom (1981)
Phosphorus Adsorption by an Aluminum-Peat ComplexSoil Science Society of America Journal, 45
F. Wielgolaski (1975)
Primary Productivity of Alpine Meadow Communities
Lawrence Pomero, E. Smith, Carol Grant (1965)
THE EXCHANGE OF PHOSPHATE BETWEEN ESTUARINE WATER AND SEDIMENTS1Limnology and Oceanography, 10
T. Mörnsjö (1969)
Studies on Vegetation and Development of a Peatland in Scania, South SwedenOikos, 20
C. Campbell, V. Biederbeck, F. Warder (1971)
Influence of Simulated Fall and Spring Conditions on the Soil System: II. Effect on Soil NitrogenSoil Science Society of America Journal, 35
Field and laboratory studies were conducted to determine the mechanisms controlling P movement, storage, and export from a minerotrophic peatland (fen) in central Michigan that had demonstrated high P removal from nutrient additions. An annual P budget completed for the fen ecosystem revealed that plant uptake requirements were 7—9 kg · ha—1 · yr—1, but 35% of aboveground P uptake by plants was returned to the peatland surface via litterfall. Permanent storage of organic P in peat ranged between 2 and 5 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 under natural levels of P input. Both microbial uptake and soil exchange capacity controlled the amount of P made available for plant growth. Fertilizer additions of 5.5 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 of P and 17 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 of N in the fen resulted in no significant (P < .05) increase in growth or nutrient uptake by emergent macrophytes as the litter—microorganism compartment (LMC) retained up to 84% of the added P in year 1. A doubling of the P fertilization level resulted in an LMC retention of only 57%. In year 2 the retention of P by the LMC dropped to 67 and 31% for the two fertilizer levels, respectively. Concurrent with decreases in LMC phosphorus retention were increased peat sorption of P, but plant growth responses and P uptake were negligible. Higher level fertilizer additions of 22 and 55 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 of P and 68 and 170 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 of N applied with minimal water additions resulted in significant (P < .05) increases in net primary productivity and P storage by Carex spp. Narrow—leaved sedge (Carex lasiocarpa, C. oligosperma, and C. aquatilis) removed as much as 61% of the P additions in year 1, with the LMC sorbing an additional 22%. Roots and rhizomes accounted for 81% of plant P storage in the higher fertilizer treatment, when surface water flow rates were reduced and fertilizer additions were sequestered in the root zone. However, seasonal dieback and leaching of P from aboveground standing plant material on the high fertilizer plots resulted in a fivefold increase of P flux to the water compartment. Microcosm 32P studies indicated that most of the P added to the fen ecosystem was removed from the water column within the 1st h by microorganisms and fine sediments, and that sedge uptake was extremely low even 45 d after addition. Thus plant uptake of P is not a major factor in the rapid removal of low levels of newly added PO4 in the fen. Selective biocide treatments used to separate the P uptake by bacteria and actinomycetes from that of fungi and yeasts in the fen surface water revealed that the latter group of microorganisms was the dominant group responsible for initial P removal. Biological uptake and abiotic sorption of P by the fine sediments in the surface waters were also shown to be of the same order of magnitude, but immobilization of P in the peat soil zone was mainly controlled by chemical sorption. Freezing of peat resulted in P release to the water column upon thawing, but concentrations returned to control levels within 24 h, suggesting minimal ecosystem losses of P in spring runoff. A Freundlich P adsorption maximum of 15 and 38 kg/ha was calculated for a 2 cm and 5 cm depth of peat adsorption, respectively. These soil P adsorption maxima are only 23% (2 cm) and 60% (5 cm) of annual wastewater P additions of 64 ± 14 kg · ha—1 · yr—1 and may account for the 26 and 42 kg/ha of P exported from the 19.5—ha test area in the fen during the 4th and 5th yr, respectively, of nutrient additions. Collectively, our field research and microcosm studies on the Houghton Lake fen suggest that soil adsorption and peat accumulation (i.e., phosphorus stored in organic matter) control long—term phosphate sequestration. But microorganisms and small sediments control initial uptake rates, especially during periods of low nutrient concentration and standing surface water. Carex P uptake increases later in the growing season during field fertilization, but algal populations in the fen water respond quickly and absorb significant amounts of P in areas where sewage effluent has been added. Both biotic and abiotic control mechanisms are thus functional in the peatland, and the proportional effect of each on P transfers is dependent on water levels, the amount of available P, fluctuating microorganism populations, seasonal changes in P absorption by macrophytes, and P soil adsorption capacity.
Ecological Monographs – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 1986
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.