Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Wakita, R. Schmitt (1970)
Elemental abundances in seven fragments from lunar rock 12013Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 9
D. Papanastassiou, G. Wasserburg (1971)
RbSr ages of igneous rocks from the Apollo 14 mission and the age of the Fra Mauro formationEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 12
K. Keil, L. Fuchs (1971)
Hibonite, Ca2/Al, Ti/24O38, from the Leoville and Allende chondritic meteorites.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 12
I. Adler, J. Trombka, J. Gerard, P. Lowman, R. Schmadebeck, H. Blodget, E. Eller, L. Yin, R. Lamothe, P. Gorenstein, P. Bjorkholm (1972)
Apollo 15 Geochemical X-ray Fluorescence Experiment: Preliminary ReportScience, 175
P. Gast, N. Hubbard (1970)
RARE EARTH ABUNDANCES IN SOIL AND ROCKS FROM THE OCEAN OF STORMS.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 10
W. Ehmann, J. Lovering (1967)
The abundance of mercury in meteorites and rocks by neutron activation analysisGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 31
A. Ringwood (1966)
Chemical evolution of the terrestrial planetsGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 30
Apollo Team (1972)
The apollo 15 lunar samples: a preliminary description.Science, 175 4020
C. Schnetzler, J. Philpotts (1970)
Partition coefficients of rare-earth elements between igneous matrix material and rock-forming mineral phenocrysts—IIGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34
(1960)
History o f the Earth's Crust
J. O'keefe (1970)
THE ORIGIN OF THE MOONScience
D. Green, A. Ringwood (1967)
The genesis of basaltic magmasContributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 15
A. Reid, C. Meyer, R. Harmon, R. Brett (1970)
Metal grains in Apollo 12 igneous rocksEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 9
L. Ahrens, H. Michaelis (1969)
The composition of stony meteorites (V) some aspects of the composition of the basaltic achondritesEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 6
D. Papanastassiou, G. Wasserburg (1971)
Lunar chronology and evolution from RbSr studies of Apollo 11 and 12 samplesEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 11
P. Gast (1968)
Trace element fractionation and the origin of tholeiitic and alkaline magma typesGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 32
N. Hubbard, P. Gast, C. Meyer, L. Nyquist, C. Shih, H. Wiesmann (1971)
Chemical composition of lunar anorthosites and their parent liquids.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 13
A. Engel, C. Engel, R. Havens (1965)
Chemical Characteristics of Oceanic Basalts and the Upper MantleGeological Society of America Bulletin, 76
G. Wetherill (1968)
Lunar Interior: Constraint on Basaltic CompositionScience
G. Wasserburg, D. Papanastassiou (1971)
Age of an Apollo 15 mare basalt - Lunar crust and mantle evolution.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 13
(1968)
Geochim. Cosmochim
R. McConnell, P. Gast (1972)
Lunar thermal history revisitedThe moon, 5
J. Philpotts (1970)
Redox estimation from a calculation of Eu2+ and Eu3+ concentrations in natural phasesEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 9
W. Ehmann, P. Baedecker, D. Mckown (1970)
Gold and iridium in meteorites and some selected rocksGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34
(1967)
Basalts: The Poldervaart Treatise on Rocks o f Basaltic Compos#ion 1, (ed
L. Soderblom, L. Lebofsky (1972)
Technique for rapid determination of relative ages of lunar areas from orbital photographyJournal of Geophysical Research, 77
S. Taylor, A. White (1966)
Trace element abundances in andesitesBulletin Volcanologique, 29
P. Gast (1960)
Limitations on the composition of the upper mantleJournal of Geophysical Research, 65
E. Robertson (1972)
The Nature of the Solid Earth
R. Brett (1971)
The earth's core: Speculations on its chemical equilibrium with the mantleGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 35
D. Shaw (1970)
Trace element fractionation during anatexisGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34
D. Papanastassiou, G. Wasserburg (1972)
Rb-Sr age of a Luna 16 basalt and the model age of lunar soils.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 13
J. Larimer, E. Anders (1967)
CHEMICAL FRACTIONATIONS IN METEORITES. II. ABUNDANCE PATTERNS AND THEIR INTERPRETATION.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 31
R. Kay, N. Hubbard, P. Gast (1970)
Chemical Characteristics and Origin of Oceanic Ridge Volcanic RocksJournal of Geophysical Research, 75
N. Shimizu, S. Akimoto (1971)
Partitioning of strontium between clinopyroxene and liquid at high pressures: preliminary experimentsEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 13
B. Levin (1971)
Phase transformations and the earth's interior: (Upper Mantle Project Scientific Report No. 26) Edited by A. E. Ringwood and D. H. Green. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1970. 519 pp. Price $33.60Icarus, 15
U. Marvin, J. Wood, J. Dickey (1970)
Ca-Al rich phases in the allende meteoriteEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 7
F. Aitken, D. Anderson, M. Bass, R. Brown, P. Butler, G. Heiken, P. Jakeš, A. Reid, W. Ridley, H. Takeda (1971)
Apollo 14 - Nature and origin of rock types in soil from the Fra Mauro formation.
K. Wedepohl (1969)
Handbook of Geochemistry
C. Watkins (1972)
Lunar science-III; revised abstracts of papers presented at the Third Lunar Science Conference, Houston, 10-13 January 1972/ Edited by Carolyn Watkins
G. Wasserburg, G. MacDonald, F. Hoyle, W. Fowler (1964)
Relative Contributions of Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium to Heat Production in the EarthScience, 143
K. Lieberman, W. Ehmann (1967)
Determination of bromine in stony meteorites by neutron activationJournal of Geophysical Research, 72
J. Smith, A. Anderson, R. Newton, E. Olsen, P. Wyllie (1970)
A Petrologic Model for the Moon Based on Petrogenesis, Experimental Petrology, and Physical PropertiesThe Journal of Geology, 78
K. Turekian, K. Wedepohl (1961)
Distribution of the Elements in Some Major Units of the Earth's CrustGeological Society of America Bulletin, 72
N. Hubbard, C. Meyer, P. Gast, H. Wiesmann (1971)
The composition and derivation of Apollo 12 soilsEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 10
THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON PAUL W. GAST NASA Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. Abstract. Three types of igneous rocks, all ultimately related to basaltic liquids, appear to be common on the lunar surface. They are: (1) iron-rich mare basalts, (2) U-, REE-, and Al-rich basalts (KREEP), and (3) plagioclase-rich or anorthositic rocks. All three rock types are depleted in elements more volatile than sodium and in the siderophile elements when relative element abundances are compared with those of carbonaceous chondrites. The chemistry and age relationships of these rocks suggest that they are derived from a feldspathic, refractory element-rich interior that becomes more pyroxeni- tic; that is, iron/magnesium-rich; with depth. It is suggested that the deeper parts of the lunar interior tend toward chondritic element abun- dances. The radial variation in mineralogy and bulk chemical composition inferred from the surface chemistry is probably a primitive feature of the Moon that reflects the accretion of refractory element- enriched materials late in the formation of the body. Chemical and mineralogic studies of samples from five different points on the Moon have shown that more than 95% of the material returned from the lunar surface has a basaltic liquid somewhere in its ancestry; i.e. the great majority of materials from the lunar surface are derived from parent rocks that probably originated as an igneous liquid. The chemical compositions of these liquids are very different from any prim- itive material that could have separated from the dust and gas surrounding the Sun. This leads to the conclusion that the igneous liquids which have preceded most lunar rocks are produced by processes that involve extensive separation of igneous liquids and crystalline solids. At the outset of this discussion, I will make the rather plausible assumption that most of the igneous rocks on the lunar surface were the product of partial melting in the lunar interior, followed by segregation and upward transport of an igneous liquid. This does not preclude the possibility that many rocks on the lunar surface have undergone a second period of melting due to large collisions. The validity of the partial melting assumption has not been seriously questioned in the sense that internal melting does not take place. There is, however, real lack of agreement con- cerning the extent to which liquids produced in the lunar interior have been modified by shallow differentiation processes. If differentiation near the lunar surface takes place, I suggest that it has not been so extensive that fundamental differences in the composition of primitive deep-seated liquids have been obscured. This assumption will be discussed further in the analysis of minor and trace element data given below. If the assumption stated here is substantially correct, one can infer that the detailed chemical composition of deep-seated lunar liquids will be a prime source of information on the chemical and mineralogical composition of the lunar interior. The main objective of this paper will be to determine constraints on the composition of the lunar interior that derive from the chemical composition of the lunar igneous rocks. Before attempting such an interpretation of the composition of the lunar inte- Communication presented at the Conference on Lunar Geophysics held between October 18-21, 1971, at the Lunar Science Institute in Houston, Texas, U.S.A. 122 PAUL W.GAST rior, the salient chemical characteristics of igneous rocks from the lunar surface will be summarized. These chemical characteristics will be compared to analogous charac- teristics of terrestrial volcanic rocks so that major similarities and differences between terrestrial and lunar basaltic rocks can be established. 1. Major Element Composition The bulk chemical composition and ranges of concentrations of major elements in un- ambiguous igneous rocks from the Apollo 11, 12, and 15 sites are shown in Table I, along with the composition of a single igneous fragment in the Luna 16 sample. TABLE I Chemical composition of major lunar rock types Mare basalts KREEP Plagioclase Silica rich rich rocks rocks XI a XIP XV e L 16 a XII e XIV f 15415g Anortho. u 12013 i Gabbro SiO2 40.70 44.95 46.07 43.8 47.6 48.0 44.08 45.3 59.7 TiOz 11.00 3.32 2.13 4.9 1.7 2.1 0.02 0.48 1.3 A1203 9.43 9.19 8.95 13.65 17.2 17.1 35.49 26.3 16.2 Cr2Oz 0.32 0.51 - 0.55 0.17 - 0.20 ~ .1 0.2 FeO 17.42 20.53 21.19 19.35 9.4 10.5 0.23 5.3 10.7 MgO 7.34 9.83 9.51 7.05 9.1 8.7 0.09 7.3 - CaO 10.52 10.94 10.21 10.4 10.2 10.7 19.68 14.6 7.1 Na20 0.49 0.28 0.26 0.38 1.0 0.7 0.34 0.3 1.0 KzO 0.18 0.058 0.034 0.15 0.7 0.5 0.01 0.07 1.7 P205 0.12 0.088 0.07 - 1.0 .... MnO 0.23 0.27 0.28 0.20 .... 0.16 a Average of 13 analyses reported in Proceedings of the First Lunar Science Conference. b Average of 17 analyses reported in Proceedings of the Second Lunar Science Conference. c Average of 7 analyses reported by LSPET, 1972. a Composition of one crystalline fragment, Vinogradov, 1971. e Average of 29 fragments, broad beam microprobe analyses given by Keil and Fuchs, 1971 ; Meyer et aL, 1971 ; Smith et al., 1970. f Average of Type B and C glasses, Apollo Soil Survey, 1971. g Composition of Rock 15415, a very pure plagioclase from Apollo 15 site, LSPET, 1972. h Average of high alumina feldspathic basalts, Reid et al., 1972. i Average composition of 12013, Wakita and Schmitt, 1970. Studies of individual millimeter and submillimeter size fragments indicate that the soil at the Apollo 11 and 12 sites contains igneous rock types that were not found in the macroscopic rock specimens returned from these sites. The Apollo 12 soil sample, in par- ticular, revealed a totally different type of basaltic rock characterized by the occurrence of orthopyroxene and very unusual relative and absolute abundances of large radius cations (U, Th, Ba, and rare Earth elements). The average major element composition THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 123 of these fragments and the range of compositions for a number of individual analyses are also given in Table I. These fragments which were designated norite by Marvin et al. (1971) and KREEP by Hubbard et al. (1971a) are remarkably similar in composi- tion to most Apollo 14 samples. Some fragments with this composition have also been found in the Apollo 11 soil; for example, Luny Rock 1 (Albee and Chodos, 1970). In addition, fragments rich in basic plagioclase have been observed in soil samples from 2G ~° " / 1Q IK .... "" 1" ...'"~t O ~ ...: ~... ,. ,~ t tt . . .... J t 's i • ".~t".' 't. , ' t I tt • t - 14! t t t~*~, "~ 7 6 1'3 1;, 1'6 1'7 ~oCaO Fig. 1. CaO and A1203 contents of lunar basalts, basaltic achondrites, and terrestrial basalts. Symbols are as follows: O Apollo 11 basalts, • Apollo 12 basalts, A KREEP, 0 Apollo 14 samples, (--) Apollo 15 basalts, [] basaltic achondrites, • oceanic ridge basalts, '~ Icelandic basalts, and × post-erosional Hawaiian basalts. The solid line shows the locus of chondrites and basaltic achondrites. Both terrestrial and lunar basalts appear to divide into groups that fall on either side of this line; i.e. the Al-rich (ORB on Earth and non-mare basalt on the Moon) group with an A1/Ca ratio greater than the meteorite ratio and the Al-poor rocks with low A1/Ca ratios (nepheline norma- tive basalts on Earth and mare basalts on the Moon) lower than the meteorite ratio. Given the very plausible assumption that :the A1/Ca ratio of both planets is meteoritic, this observation suggests that two distinct petrogenetic fractionation trends are involved in producing liquids with these compositions. 124 PAUL W. GAST all points on the lunar surface that have been sampled. Such plagioclase-rich fragments also occur as clasts in most breccias returned from the lunar surface. Mineralogically, these fragments resemble terrestrial anorthosites or anorthositic gabbros. Many of these rock fragments cannot possibly represent a primitive liquid. The data discussed below also suggests that plagioclase-rich fragments cannot have been derived from a single parent liquid. Two compositions representing gabbroic anorthosite and rather pure anorthosite are shown in Table I. The existence of rocks enriched in plagioclase by segregation of this mineral from an igneous liquid was dramatically demonstrated by the discovery of a rock consisting of more than 99~ pure plagioclase during the Apollo 15 mission. Finally - for completeness - the composition of the light portion of one very unusual rock - 12013 - which is similar to granite in composition is given in Table I. The summary given in Table I shows that the elements iron, titanium, and alumi- num - and to a lesser extent magnesium - account for most of the variance in the chemical composition between groups of lunar igneous liquids. This variation is il- o o ,k' 2¢ ll; o" ~:, o 1£ .T t . i • ::'t~, , ' " ti" • - -.. , ...: • • ,: t .... ". $ t t J i 0 1 "1 3 ~, ~i 6 7 c~ lJO isl 12 13 14 1'5 ll6 1'7 ll8 i'9 20 % Mgo Fig. 2. FeO and MgO contents of lunar basalts, basaltic achondrites, and terrestrial basalts. Symbols same as Figure 1. The three groups of terrestrial basalts shown here were chosen to illustrate the extremes in total Fe (as FeO), FeO, Al~O3, and TiO2 contents found in terrestrial basalts. A much more extensive compilation - e.g. Manson (1967) - of terrestrial basalts would still show a very marked gap between the total Fe content of lunar and terrestrial basalts. The high MgO Apollo 12 basalts are probably the result of olivine (Fa 68-72) accumulation. THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 125 lustrated in three different plots of the concentrations of these elements shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3. The iron-magnesium and iron-titanium plots show rather clearly that there is a first-order separation of lunar samples into a high iron and low iron group. The calcium-aluminum diagram shows a similar variation in the aluminum content. In fact, the high aluminum and low iron group of samples appear to coincide as do the high iron and low aluminum group. The iron, titanium, and magnesium concentrations observed in some terrestrial basalts are also shown in Figures 1,2, and 3. The comparison of lunar and terrestrial compositions clearly indicates that the mare basalts have higher total iron concentrations than most terrestrial basalts. Fur- thermore, iron is consistently present only as Fe ÷ ÷ except for very minor amounts of metallic iron, while terrestrial basalts always contain significant proportions of ferric iron. The CaO and AlzO 3 concentrations of mare basalts are somewhat similar to 2~ Oo,. O' O" ~,0 o .... d:r I1' V~ t ttt t t t tt t t' • ~tt t t. t tt.- ~t t.. t tt ?".t t z .... ,-:.:..ff~.0 ..~'.'~:, • ,~..i.~ Ix:i: t x " .~'. ~ .: • . × O ' ' 6 7 8 9 1() 11 12 13 °/o TiO 2 Fig. 3. Total Fe (as FeO) and TiO2 contents of lunar basalts, basaltic achondrites, and terrestrial basalts. Symbols same as Figure 1. The extreme TiO2 contents of Apollo 11 basalts are clearly shown here. However, other mare basalts (Luna 16) also tend to have relatively high TiO2 contents relative to terrestrial basalts. 126 PAUL W. GAST those of undersaturated olivine basalts, while the non-mare or low iron basalts are, in many respects, similar to the oceanic ridge basalts. Even though the comparison il- lustrated in Figures 1-3 is far from exhaustive, it is clear that variation in chemical compositions found in lunar basaltic rocks is much greater than that observed for ter- restrial basaltic rocks, The Na20 and K20 content of terrestrial basalts, lunar basalts, and meteoritic materials are compared in Figure 4. These data show that lunar and meteoritic materials have consistently higher NazO/K20 ratios than terrrestrial ba- salts. No adequate explanation of this systematic difference has been put forth to date. v'" .~g u~ 0 + • • o u V ~ +. .+ • ++ e r4 .j..~ ll~ 0 SAMPLE 12013 7 - "..4.',. • ...... ¢ ............ 0 illll • " v .......... e 0 All BRECCIA & SOIL .05 ¸ .i;a ................ • • A12 IGNEOUS • I (Avg} NEPHEtlNE NORMATIVE ACHONDR~TES 0(~1 c.o ....... J i r 4 J Ji i * ~ i i ~ J ii i J i i i i L iJ .OS .1 .5 1 5 10 ~K20 Fig. 4. KzO and Na20 content of terrestrial and lunar basalts. The ratio of K~O/Na20 is system- atically higher in meteoritic and lunar materials than all terrestrial basalts. 2. Minor Elements In order to facilitate subsequent discussion of trace element concentrations, they will arbitrarily be divided into three groups: (1) The large ion lithophile elements - K, Rb, Cs, Ba, U, Th, REE, St, and Li (Li will be discussed with this group even though it is clearly a much smaller ion); (2) The siderophile elements - i.e. elements more easily reduced than iron; and (3) Elements that are volatile under reducing conditions at temperatures in excess of 1000-1200°C. The latter group includes many of the chal- cophile elements (elements forming stable sulfur compounds) in addition to the hal- ogens. It may also include Au and Ge which also belong to Group 2. The comparison of the chemistry of basalts from different points on the lunar sur- face will emphasize the large ion lithophile elements because the abundance of these THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 127 elements varies greatly from one type of lunar basalt to another. The latter groups will be discussed more generally. In all of the discussion of minor elements, the abundance of these elements in carbonaceous chondrites will frequently be employed as a con- venient frame of reference. 2.1. SIDEROPHILE ELEMENTS Elements that are concentrated into the iron-nickel phase in chondritic meteorites have been designated siderophile elements (Goldschmidt, 1954). The most unambiguous examples are Ni, Co, Ge, Au, Re, and the Pt metals. In the Earth these elements are thought to be largely concentrated into the Earth's core (Goldschmidt, 1954; Ring- wood, 1966; Brett, 1971). Thus terrestrial basalts would be expected to be markedly depleted in these elements when compared to chondritic meteorites. The understand- ing of the geochemistry of these elements is, in general, very limited by the paucity of data, particularly for Re, Au, and most of the Pt elements. Even the very detailed studies of the lunar samples produced little or no accurate data for most Pt elements. Figure 5 is a summary of the concentration of these elements in lunar mare basalts and terrestrial basalts. The depletion of these elements is remarkably variable. It is signif- icant that Os and Ir are much more depleted than Ni and Co. Furthermore, the appar- ---1Au Ru Rh Pd Re Os Ir Pt Ni Co /u I I I f I I I I I IN MARE AND ...... APOLLO 11 APOLLO t2 kU / t.) .-e. TERRESTRIAL / Z 10-2 ~o ,¢ I.U 10 -3 O 10-4 -r" 10-5 Fig. 5. Chondrite normalized siderophile abundance patterns. Chondrite data are taken from Crocket (1969). Lunar data are taken from Reed and Jovanovi6 (1971), Anders et al. (1971), Baedecker et al. (1971), Herr et al. (1971), and Laul et al. (1972). BASALTS TERRESTRIAL ELEMENTS SIDEROPHILE 128 PAUL W. GAST ent removal of Ni from the Earth's mantle (Ringwood, 1966; Brett, 1971) is not nearly as extensive as would be inferred from the known distribution of Ni between silicates and metal. Terrestrial and lunar basalts are remarkably similar for the Ni, Co, and the platinum metals in this comparison. However, Ge and possibly Au are much more de- pleted than other siderophile elements. The depletion of the lunar basaltic rocks by as much as six orders of magnitude indicates that the parent liquids for these rocks must have been equilibrated with a metallic iron, which was separated from these liquids before they reached the surface (see also Reid et al., 1970). O'Keefe (1970) has suggested that the similarity in terrestrial and lunar siderophile element abundances is strong evi- dence that the Moon must have separated from the Earth after formation of the Earth's mantle. This hypothesis does not explain the different Fe/Mg ratio of the lunar and terrestrial basalts or the different Na/K ratio. It is, furthermore, significant that some siderophile elements - in particular Au and Ge - are much more depleted in the lunar basalts than they are in terrestrial basalts. Other elements, e.g. Pb, TI, Bi, and the hal- ogens, are also extremely depleted. These differences are not readily explained by the fission hypothesis. However, a few percent of metallic Fe formed by reduction or pre- sent in the primitive Moon are probably sufficient to return siderophile elements in the lunar interior. Ge Au Hg T t Ib Bi Zn Cd CI Br• ® t • e ~-10 "~ • ® o u Lu~ o. Q :Ez '<0 ~. 10 -3 VOLATILE ELEMENTS in TERRESTRIAL and LUNAR BASALTS and Ca-RICH ACHONDRITES Fig. 6. Chondrite normalized abundances of Ge, Au, Hg, TI, Pb, Bi, Zn, Cd, C1, and Br. The concentrations were divided by average of Type I and II carbonaceous chondrites given by Larimer and Anders (1967). Basalt and achondrite data were taken from Ehmann et aL (1970), Wasson and Baedecker (1970), Ehmann (1967), Turekian and Wedepohl (1961), Engel et al. (1965), Lieberman (unpublished results), Lieberman and Ehmann (1967); Reed and Jovanovi~ (1971). Lunar data was taken largely from the work of Ganapathy et al. (1970). Pb ~°4 concentrations were estimated from the work of Tatsumoto (1970). THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 129 2.2. VOLATILE AND NONVOLATILE ELEMENTS Anders (1965) has shown that many heavy metals are regularly depleted in hypersthene and bronzite chondrites when compared to Type I carbonaceous and Type I enstatite ehondrites. Gast (1960, 1968a) has argued that many of these elements are also de- pleted in the Earth when compared to carbonaceous chondrites or normal chondrites. This naturally leads to a query regarding the abundance of these elements in the Moon. Carbonaceous chondrite normalized abundances of the elements Ge, Au, Hg, T1, Pb, Bi, Zn, Cd, U, and Br in achondrites, terrestrial basalts, and lunar basalts are shown in Figure 6. Even though some of the concentrations of many of these elements cover a rather wide range, it is quite clear that lunar basalts, as well as achondrites, are much more depleted in this group of elements than terrestrial basalts. The only non-sidero- phile element that is strongly depleted in terrestrial basalts is Hg. The marked depletion in volatile elements is also demonstrated when the abundance of moderately volatile elements such as the heavy alkali metals is compared to that of geochemically similar refractory elements like barium and uranium. The geochemical io 5 ~x xCh°ndrites Carbonaceous chondrites Earth z Tektites ApIIF+Br Ap 11 LK Moon I I I I I r I h I 10 2 2 5 10 3 2 5 10 4 2 5 10 5 Silicon-normalized potassium concentration, ppm Fig. 7. Potassium/uranium mass ratios in the Earth's crust, chondritic meteorites, calcium rich achondrites, and lunar rocks and soil. The K concentrations have been normalized to a constant SiO2 concentration, i.e. K plotted=K observed x Si observed 18.5. Terrestrial data are representative analyses of composites or averages taken from the literature. Chondrite analyses include 4 enstatite chondrites, 6 olivine bronzite chondrites, and 17 olivine hypersthene chondrites. Analyses are taken from the literature; K and U determinations are usually on different samples and by different analysts. Calcium-rich achondrites plotted for Nuevo Laredo, Stannern, Moore Co., Sioux Co, Pasamonte, Juvinas, and Macabini. Groups of lunar samples shown are Apollo 11 low K rocks, fines and breccia (Br), and high K (HK) rocks; Apollo 12 igneous rocks (X); Apollo 12 fines (F) and breccia (Br); and Apollo 12 rock 12013 (R 13). 130 PAUL w. OAST similarity of potassium and uranium or thorium is well established by a large number of excellent analyses for these elements in a variety of terrestrial rocks. The relative abundance of potassium and/or thorium varies by less than a factor of 2 in rocks as diverse as oceanic ridge basalts containing less than 0.1 ~ potassium and granites hav- ing more than 5~ potassium. The constancy of the K/U ratio in a wide variety of ter- restrial rocks is illustrated in Figure 7. The variation in the relative abundance of these elements in meteorites is in strong contrast with that found in terrestrial rocks. Achondritic meteorites are strongly depleted in potassium relative to uranium when compared to most chondrites. The wide range of K/U ratios observed for meteorites is also illustrated in Figure 7. The K/U ratio and K contents of all lunar rocks analyzed to date are compared with those of both meteorites and terrestrial rocks in Figure 7. The data shown there suggests that the Moon, like the Earth, has a distinctive K/U ratio and that the lunar ratio is even lower than that of the Earth. In addition, careful com- parisons of various lunar rock types reveal that the high-K or KREEP basalts have systematically lower K/U ratios (1500 +_ 300) than the mare basalts (3000 + 700). It is well known that the high temperature behavior of lithium is quite different from that of the heavier alkali metals. Its volatility is, in fact, similar to that of refractory elements like calcium and aluminum. The different behavior of these elements in com- plex natural systems has been clearly demonstrated by simple volatilization experiments on lunar samples (Gibson and Hubbard, 1972). A comparison of terrestrial, meteoritic, and lunar K/Li ratios similar to K/U ratios does, indeed, show a remarkable parallel- ism between these two element ratios. Both the alkali metal comparisons and the low abundance of other volatile elements suggest that that part of the Moon that is involved in the formation of the rocks now seen on the surface must be depleted in volatile ele- ments when compared to more primitive solid systems such as carbonaceous chon- drites which are generally accepted as representative in solar abundances. 2.3. LARGE ION LITHOPHILE ELEMENTS The elements that normally occur as oxides or silicates in chondritic meteorites were first designated as lithophile elements by Goldschmidt (1954). A somewhat more re- strictive class of elements are those lithophile elements that are strongly enriched in the Earth's crust relative to the whole Earth or the Earth's mantle. These are generally electropositive elements forming ions substantially larger than the major cations of the mantle, i.e. Mg, Fe, Ca, and At. The heavy alkaline earths Sr and Ba, the rare earth elements, and uranium will be considered in the discussion that follows. The alkali elements K, Rb, and Cs are both volatile and form large electropositive ions. The con- centrations of the refractory LIL (large ion lithophile) elements will be considered in a standard frame of reference, i.e. they will be compared to average concentration of these elements in chondrites. The chondrite normalized concentrations of this series of elements for igneous rocks from the Apollo 11, 12, 14, and 15 siteg are shown in Figures 8 and 9. Similar element abundance patterns in a group of terrestrial basalts are shown in Figure 10. The data shown there are chosen to represent the widest range of trace THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 131 element characteristics observed for these elements. They illustrate the relation be- tween the degree of silica saturation and the slope in the abundance pattern that has been observed for most basalts found in oceanic regions. The most remarkable characteristic of the lunar igneous rocks is the very marked 1001 Fe-RICH BASALTS NONVOLATILE LARGE ION LITHOPHILE ELEMENTS f APOLLO 12 APOLLO 14 ....... 40 ". " .................... ~ ...... ............ ,,, APOLLO 15 --*--- -r 2o Q. lO "'-. jf I I I I I I I I t I'-'I .... I Ba U La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Lu Sr Fig. 8. Chondrite normalized refractory large lithophile element abundances for Fe-rich basalts from Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15 sites and Luna 16. Chondrite values and Apollo 12 samples are from Hubbard and Gast (1971) ; Apollo 14 data are from Hubbard et al. (1972); sample 15555 data are from Philpotts (personal communication, 1971); other Apollo 15 data are unpublished results. KIIEEP 8ASALTS NONVOLATILE LARGE ION LITHOPHILE ELEMENTS 00 ~/ .......... ad Z 100- D. 4o 10 ,, i I I I I I I I I I I i Ba U La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Lu Sr Fig. 9. Chondrite normalized refractory large ion lithophile elements in KREEP basalt fragments from Apollo 14 and Apollo 12 sites. Data are from Hubbard and Gast (1971) and Hubbard et al. (1972). Some Eu and Sr concentrations for these fragments could not be plotted because of overlapping data points. Apollo 11 samples are from Gast et al. (1970). 132 PAUL W. GAST Oceanic ridge basalt ........ Alkali basalt, Hawaii I000 ..... Nephelinite, Hawaii ~ ~--~ Minette, Hopi, Arizona ................ Leucite basalt, Wyoming \ "~ .~N'XX x 80 \ "..',,, -. \%, --o~. - \ -'-. ,,? , :......... -x~ ""°,.,....~. "...., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ba La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy let Yb Lu Fig. 10. Chondrite normalized terrestrial LIL abundance patterns. Data are from Kay (1970), Kay et aI. (1970), and unpublished data. Uranium data on oceanic basalts were furnished by Tatsumoto (personal communication). separation of europium and strontium from the remaining large ions. The anomalous abundance of europium is almost certainly related to the different oxidation states of terrestrial and lunar basalts. It was noted above that lunar basalts are virtually free of ferric iron. Terrestrial basalts rarely have less than 10~o of their iron as Fe ÷ ÷ ÷. Trace element studies on a relatively reduced group of terrestrial basalts, i.e. the oceanic ridge basalts, show that europium is only partly reduced to Eu + + (Eu + +/Eu + + + ~ 0.2). Careful analysis of europium concentrations in coexisting phases in lunar basalts shows that the Eu ÷ +/Eu +++ ratio in the parent liquid of these basalts was probably in ex- cess of 5 (Philpotts, 1970). Since Eu ÷ + and Sr ÷ ÷ have very similar ionic characteris- tics, it is not surprising that these two elements should behave quite similarly during igneous differentiation processes. The terrestrial and lunar characteristics of the other large ions shown in Figure 10 are also somewhat different. Terrestrial basalts are characterized by wide range of re- lative abundances of light and heavy rare-earths. The light and heavy rare-earths in lunar basalts are only mildly fractionated. Thus the variation in concentration of the heavy rare-earths in lunar basalts is much greater than that observed in terrestrial THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 133 basalts. We should also note that barium is frequently significantly depleted relative to light rare earths such as Ce and Nd in a number of lunar basalts where the light rare- earth elements are otherwise strongly enriched. The distinctive europium and strontium fractionations observed in the lunar basalt indicate that the liquids from which these basalts crystallized must have separated from a phase enriched in large divalent ions. The only common mineral fitting this des- cription is plagioclase. It was noted above that calcium-rich plagioclase fragments do occur in the lunar soil. Several individual plagioclase-rich fragments have been ana- lyzed for the LIL elements. The relative abundances are shown in Figure 11. These L16 q~~APOLLO 12 i. O 105 LAPOLLO 15 ~__~_.~sAPOLLO 11 "12oz3 % "- 31o "0S3 ~ t~ ~ ADDITION OF \ 1 \\~o~ ~,Ao,,oc~A~ \ A ~o~,~, 2 ~DDITION OF "~) k'~ ~° "~"o~ KREEP Fe-Mg MINERALS I I I I I III I I I I J I I 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ppm SAMARIUM Fig. l 1. Sr/Eu ratios versus Sm content of lunar basaltic samples. Data are from references cited in Figures 8 and 9. analyses clearly show that europium and strontium are, indeed, both enriched in plagioclase; however, the abundance of these two elements in different fragments rich in plagioclase appears to vary significantly. Hubbard et al. (1971a) conclude that some anorthosites are derived from Eu and Sr depleted liquids, while others are derived from liquids in which the relative abundance of these elements is nearly chondritic. When the major element and LIL element compositions of various lunar rock types are compared, they reveal a very systematic correlation, i.e. all LIL-rich rocks are re- latively rich in A1 and poor in Fe, and the LIL element poor rocks are Fe-rich, and low in A1; that is, mare basalts. Detailed examination of the LIL abundance patterns reveal a number of significant regularities: (1) The high A1 basaltic rocks have LIL abundance patterns in which the light REE and U are systematically enriched relative to the heavy REE. Only La and occasionally Ce depart from this regular pattern. (2) Many of the Fe-rich basalts have LIL abundance patterns with maxima in the region 134 PAUL W. GAST KREEP GLASS cO ELI I-- CALC. LIQUIDS :z: 10 Ld ._J bO KREEP ANOR. 1.0 L../ ANOR. 0.1 I P [ I I I I I I [ wA t BaLa Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er" Yb Lu St" Fig. 12. Chondrite normalized abundance of LIL elements in two different types of plagioclase-rich fragments. Data are from Hubbard et al. (1971b). Liquids in equilibrium with these two types are calculated using distribution coefficients estimated from plagioclase phenocryst matrix comparisons. of Sm and Gd. (3) The abundances of Eu and Sr correlate rather well. (4) The ratio Sr/Eu varies in a regular way with the abundance of Gd and Sin. This is illustrated in Figure 12, which shows that the Sr/Eu ratio of lunar basalts approaches that of chondritic meteorites as the total LIL element abundance decreases. The LIL element data summarized here clearly shows that terrestrial and lunar basalts differ in at least two significant characteristics: (1) Some terrestrial basalts must be produced by pro- cesses which can fractionate the heavy rare-earth and light rare-earth elements very efficiently, and (2) The behavior of both Sr and Eu in terrestrial basalts is significantly different (particularly in nepheline-normative basalts) from that found in lunar basalts. 3. Summary of Chemical Characteristics Generalizations regarding the chemistry of the lunar surface made at this writing are subject to serious limitations. First, the paucity of data and secondly, they are highly THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 135 susceptible to revision by new data obtained on forthcoming lunar landings. In this context, the proposed generalizations put forth here are somewhat in the nature of propositions rather than observations. Even though the data is limited and subject to revision, it furnishes us with a useful working hypothesis. The comparison of samples from four unambiguous mare regions with two somewhat ambiguous non-mare re- gions clearly suggests that the iron and aluminum concentrations in basaltic rocks on the lunar surface are major chemical characteristics that distinguish the lunar high- lands and lunar maria. Preliminary results from the Apollo 15 experiment that measured the intensity of characteristic aluminum and silicon x-radiation from the lunar surface (Adler et al., 1972) show that the AlzOa-rich materials must be a major component of large areas of the highlands. Results of the measurement of the gamma ray intensity of the lunar surface (Metzger et al., 1972) clearly indicate that the abundance of LIL-rich material may vary greatly from one highland material or summary region to another. The re- lative abundance of Al-rich basaltic rocks also rich in LIL elements and very Al-rich anorthositic rocks that are poor in LIL elements is at present one of the major unre- solved questions about the lunar highlands. Chemical and mineralogical analyses of individual grains from the lunar regolith have revealed several rock types not elaborated in the above summary; for example, ultramafic rocks, trachytic or silicic basalts, and extremely Fe- and Ti-rich glasses. The abundance and source of such rocks on the lunar surface is not known. In addition, optical (McCord et al., 1972) and photographic studies of the lunar sur- face suggest that the very low albedo materials such as those found in the southeastern portion of Mare Serenitatis and in smaller occurrences like the dark halo craters in the Crater Alphonsus or the dark halo crater Copernicus H may represent a distinctive et al. and McCord (personal communication) sug- type of volcanic material. McCord gest that these dark materials contain a high proportion of Fe- and Ti-rich glass. The association of the low albedo materials with distinctive volcanic structures indicates that they may be a type of volcanic deposit that should be distinguished from the much more widespread mare basalts. Perhaps the very Fe- and Ti-rich glasses are derived from these young volcanic structures. 3.1. CHRONOLOGY OF LUNAR The absolute ages of mare basalts from four points on the lunar surface (Papanastassiou and Wasserburg, 1971 a, b, 1972; Wasserburg and Papanastassiou, 1971) and studies of crater morphology (Soderblom and Lebofsky, 1972) indicate that most mare volca- nism probably occurred during the interval 3.0-4.0 billion years ago. The age of crys- tallization in several non-mare basalts collected at the Apollo 14 site have also been determined (Wasserburg and Papanastassiou, 1971). These times cannot, however, be unambiguously ascribed to an extrusive igneous event; that is, they cannot be asso- ciated with extensive lunar volcanism. The widespread occurrence on the lunar surface of small fragments that yield Rb/Sr model ages 4.4-4.5 billion years suggests that many of the materials with crystallization ages of 3.9-4.0 billion years may, in fact, be derived VOLCANISM 136 PAUL W.GAST from igneous rocks formed much earlier in lunar history. Hubbard and Gast (1971) specifically suggest that the chemical and isotopic characteristics require liquids pro- duced by partial melting 4.3-4.4 billion years ago. The absolute age of the dark halo or low albedo deposits can only be inferred from their morphology and relatively un- disturbed character. The occurrence of one such crater on the ejecta of a young rayed crater, i.e. Copernicus, indicates that such materials were deposited substantially later than the youngest mare basalts. When viewed together, the chemical and chronological data suggests that the charac- ter of lunar volcanism apparently changed with time, beginning with Fe-poor and Al-rich materials 4.4-4.5 billion years ago and ending with very Fe-rich materials perhaps as recently as 1 billion years ago. It should also be noted that the total volume of post-3 billion year volcanism is probably negligible or very small when compared to the volume of pre-3 billion year volcanic materials. The changing characteristics of lunar volcanism probably reflect both the increasing depth of the zone of melting and radial variations in the chemistry and mineralogy of the planet. 4. Lunar Interior and Petrogenesis of Lunar Marie Liquids Most of the major chemical characteristics of uncontaminated (by assimilation of continental crusts) terrestrial mafic liquids can be explained by two factors: (1) The extent of partial melting in the Earth's upper mantle and (2) the depth at which the melting or equilibration with the mantle takes place (see for example, Green and Ringwood, 1967; Gast, 1968b, 1970; Green, 1970). The andesites and tholeiitic ba- salts of the island arcs may be an exception to this generalization if they are produced by melting of an underthrust oceanic crust (Taylor et al., 1969). The application of this generally accepted model of the petrogenesis of terrestrial mafic liquids has pro- vided important insights into the chemistry and mineralogy of the Earth's upper mantle. It is quite natural that a similar model of basalt petrogenesis should be in- voked for the lunar mafic liquids. Before doing so, however, the validity of several alternative models must be considered. With virtually no knowledge of the detailed structure and stratigraphy of the lunar surface and very little information on the physical state of the lunar interior, it is difficult to make such an evaluation in a rigo- rous way. However, the inferences and implications of some alternative models of petrogenesis which have been proposed tend to support the partial melting model as the most plausible explanation of the observed chemical and physical characteristics. Specifically, the alternatives to partial melting at different depths in the lunar interior involve chemical fractionation on a Moon-wide scale (see for example, Smith et al., 1970; Wood et aI., 1970) or very extensive differentiation by fractional crystallization near the lunar surface (O'Hara et al., 1970). These alternative models will not be re- viewed in detail here, but some general characteristics and implications need to be noted. Any scheme of differentiation that produces the chemical characteristics of the lunar basalts in a single Moon-wide melting and crystallization event leads to the in- ference that the residual basaltic liquids produced by such an event should be quite THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 137 similar from place to place. The systematic and large difference between the Apollo 11, 12, and 15 basalts is not predicted by such a model and must thus be explained by ad- ditional local differentiation processes. The more than fivefold difference in abundance of many lithophile elements that is found for the Apollo 11 and 12 or 15 sites is an ex- ample of the scope of the local differentiation processes that need to be invoked. The early Moon-wide differentiation hypothesis has the inherent feature that it is asso- ciated with the heating of the Moon by release of gravitational potential energy during lunar accretion or by other cataclysmic heating processes. In this case, the melting of the Moon must take place in a very short interval, with subsequent cooling of the outer 100 km over a period of 10-30 million years. All rocks associated with this early melting and particularly with the formation of the crust must, therefore, date back to a single early event in lunar history and must fall within a very narrow range of absolute ages. O'Hara et al. (1970) have emphasized massive near-surface fractional crystallization and the loss of volatile elements from the surface of lava extrusions, in particular, sodium and water, in explaining the petrogenesis of the Apollo 11 liquids. The loss of volatile ions and molecular species from large volumes of a silicate liquid is almost certainly controlled by the diffusion rate of these species in the liquid rather than the escape rate from the surface of the liquid. In this situation, one would conclude that depletion in volatiles should only be observed in a thin surface layer. Depletion of flows and intrusions that are hundreds of meters thick (or even tens of meters) requires both extreme convection and diffusion rate in these bodies. The complete absence of heterogeneities in sodium and water rich minerals in the lunar igneous rocks and soil is strong evidence against the efficacy of volatilization of these elements from liquids ex- truded on the lunar surface. The extent of fractional crystallization due to removal of plagioclase has been considered by Gast et aI. (1970). They point out that the europium and strontium anomalies can only be accounted for in an extremely aluminum rich liquid. Thus, one chemical characteristic is explained by introducing another that is even more difficult to explain, i.e. postulating the existence of liquids that contain more than 80~ anorthite. In summary, it appears that the most comprehensive and generally satisfactory ex- planation of the chemical characteristics of the mare basalts and high aluminum KREEP liquids is the hypothesis that they were formed by partial melting, segregation of liquid, and upward transport of this liquid in the lunar interior. Proceeding from this working hypothesis, one can now inquire into the chemical and mineralogical composition of the lunar interior and the cause of the differences in terrestrial and lunar basalts. 4.1. PHASE COMPOSITION OF THE LUNAR INTERIOR Ringwood and Essene (1970) have attempted to infer the phase composition of the lunar interior from the bulk composition of the Apollo 11 basalts in a series of lab- oratory experiments in which the phases in equilibrium with liquids of this composition at different pressures and temperatures were determined. They conclude that the 138 PAUL W. GAST Apollo 11 basalts should be saturated with armalcolite, subcalcic augite, and nearly saturated with orthopyroxene. They also conclude that these liquids could not have been saturated with plagioclase. From these observations and the known distribution of density in the Moon, they are led to the suggestion that the lunar liquids are derived from a pyroxene rich assemblage. They propose a specific composition for this pyrox- enite which is given in Table II. It should be noted that their composition implies a substantial fractionation between titanium and calcium or aluminum when it is com- TABLE II Model compositions of the lunar interior 1 2 3 4 SiO2 53.1 49.1 48 49.48 TiO2 1.0 0.45 0.8 0.46 A1208 5.0 6.0 16 5.10 FeO 13.5 18 9 17.39 Cr2Oa 0.5 0.5 - 1.34 MgO 22.5 19.6 14 20.5 CaO 4.0 5.3 12 4.02 Na~O 0.1 0.1 - 0.17 MnO 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 1. Lunar Interior, Ringwood and Essene, 1970. 2. Lower Lunar Mantle, this paper. 3. Mean Composition of the Upper 150 kin, this paper. 4. Frankford, Howardite. pared to the composition of chondritic meteorites. In the pyroxenite of Ringwood and Essene, plagioclase is stable to depths of 210 km at the temperature where basaltic liquid would be formed. At greater depths, plagioclase breaks down to spinel and pyroxene. Ringwood and Essene conclude from this diagram that the Apollo 11 liquids are produced by 1-2~o partial melting of the spinel-bearing assemblage. This hypoth- esis conflicts with the strontium and europium anomalies; that is, the occurrence of plagioclase inferred from these anomalies. The composition of the Apollo 14 samples; in particular, the uniformly high A120 a concentrations and high normative plagioclase content inferred from the bulk chemi- cal composition of individual fragments and the average soil, indicates that non-mare basalts should commonly have plagioclase on the liquidus. Experimental studies (Walker et aL, 1972; Ringwood et al., 1972) with liquids similar in composition to the Apollo 14 rocks have, indeed, shown that plagioclase is a liquidus phase. If liquids sim- ilar in composition to the Apollo 14 basalts are the product of partial melting in the lunar interior, one can safely infer that plagioclase is a phase that exists in the lunar interior in addition to clino- and orthopyroxene. Thus, in the case of the KREEP basalts, the phase compositions derived for the source of these liquids by both experimental phase equilibria studies and from the trace element patterns are in rather good agreement. The phase composition of the THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 139 source of the mare basalts - in particular, the Apollo 11 basalts - remains as one of the unresolved questions in the petrogenesis of lunar materials. The evidence arising from trace element data will be further explored in the following section. 4.2. MINOR ELEMENT CONSTRAINTS ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE LUNAR INTERIOR The trace element characteristics of lunar igneous liquids enumerated above can be as- cribed to: (1) the concentration and relative abundance of these elements in the source of the igneous liquids; i.e. the lunar interior and (2) the production, transport, and crystallization of these liquids. In other words, if the petrogenesis of the basaltic liquids is sufficiently well understood, the element abundance patterns observed for lunar basalts can yield information on the abundance of these elements in the lunar interior. The magnitude of the element abundances and the degree to which some elements are fractionated relative to each other allow us to state some conclusions on the composi- tion of the lunar interior even before specific petrogenetic models are investigated. Due to the relatively large area-to-volume ratio of a small body like the Moon, the chemical composition of the surface can place a significant limit on the composition of the whole body. If, for example, it is assumed that the Apollo 14 materials and the KREEP fragments in the Apollo 12 soil are representative of a significant part of the non-mare lunar surface, one must infer certain constraints on the volume and compo- sition of hypothetical source materials required to produce a lunar crust containing a significant portion of such rocks. In order to illustrate this point, I will assume that the mass of such materials now found near the lunar surface is equivalent to a shell 1 km thick. It should be noted that a 1 km thick low density crust can in no way account for the significant gravity anomalies (mascons) observed on the lunar surface. Reasonable density differences; that is, less than one gram per cc, require crustal thicknesses of low density material in excess of 20 km. Furthermore, the extensive cratering of the lu- nar surface; in particular, the lunar highlands, has resulted in some homogenization of the surface of the Moon so that samples now collected from the lunar surface must rep- resent a vertical sampling that greatly exceeds 1 km, so a sample collected at several sites indicates vertical thicknesses far in excess of 1 km. The postulated 1 km layer is not equivalent to assuming that the entire lunar crust is similar to the Apollo 14 samples in composition; in fact, if the Moon has a crust 20-30 km thick, we assume that less than one-tenth of this crust is similar to the Apollo 14 materials in composition. Never- theless, even this plausible assumption requires a shell of chondritic composition ap- proximately 300 km thick to produce the postulated 1 km crust; that is, complete ex- traction of a group of elements from approximately 40~o of the mass of the Moon would be required to make a relatively small fraction of the present lunar crust if the Moon had a chondritic concentration of elements like uranium, barium, and the light rare-earth elements. This simple calculation clearly illustrates the difficulties that are associated with a chondritic lunar composition. The extension of this heuristic calculation to include a larger crust with lower ur- anium concentrations is quite obvious. A 30 km thick crust with an average uranium content of 0.5 ppm requires complete extraction of uranium from a mass much 140 PAUL W. GAST larger than the 60~ of the Moon that remains after a 1 kilometer thick layer of KREEP is accounted for. In summary, the uranium concentrations observed in surface rocks appear to imply very deep and extremely efficient differentiation very early in lunar history. At present, this possibility probably cannot be rigorously excluded. However, it leads to several serious problems - in particular, a heat source for complete melting of the primitive Moon is required. Also, it implies that the source of the mare basalts is extensively depleted in LIL elements. This implication is in direct conflict with the element abun- dance patterns observed for these basalts. We have already noted that chondritic concentrations of volatile elements in the lunar interior are inconsistent with the observed chemistry of the lunar surface; i.e. much lower concentrations of volatile elements are inferred. It now appears that we must further conclude that the lunar abundance of certain refractory elements is also nonchondritic, but enriched rather than depleted. This conclusion has already been tentatively derived from the LIL element abundance patterns observed in mare basalts (Haskin et al., 1970; Gast and Hubbard, 1970). The high abundance of these elements in the Apollo 11 basalts is inconsistent with any plausible petrogenetic model which derived liquids of this composition from a chondritic source. It is quite clear that simi- lar models applied to the non-mare basalts with even higher concentrations of these elements will lead to even stronger similar conclusions. The basic model used to relate observed or postulated igneous liquid compositions to the composition of the source of these liquids is that of Gast (1968b) and Shaw (1970). This model has been used with some success in explaining LIL element abundances in terrestrial basalts (Kay, 1970). It will be utilized here to further elucidate the LIL element patterns in lunar basalts. As a rather good first approximation, the major elements or components, e.g. SiO2, A1203, CaO, and (MgO + FeO), in a silicate liquid produced by partial melting of the multi-phase assemblage are controlled by the mineral phases in equilibrium with that liquid part are independent of the proportion of these phases. This is not the case for minor elements that exist as dilute solutions in coexisting solid phases and liquid phases. The proportion of different phases, in particular, the proportion of liquid re- lative to solid phases, has a drastic effect on the composition of the liquid in addition to the specific phases that may be present. For the simple case where all phases are as- sumed to be in thermodynamic equilibrium, the composition of the liquid relative to the bulk composition of the system producing this liquid can be readily determined from the phase composition and dilute solution distribution coefficients. The usefulness of this simple model is at present restricted by the quality and paucity of data for dis- tribution coefficients for elements of interest between coexisting mafic phases. How- ever, even the present poorly-known distribution coefficients are sufficient to explain a number of qualitative characteristics of the LIL element abundance patterns and, furthermore, they lead to some semi-quantitative estimates of the phase and trace ele- ment composition of the source of the lunar and terrestrial basaltic liquids. Relevant observations and data on the appropriate distribution coefficients needed to explain the observed element patterns are summarized in Figure 13. The data shown there are THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 141 "!. t.) // WHITLOCKITE 0 I I I I I I Ba La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Sr Fig. 13. Distribution coeffÉcients for some LIL elements. The value plotted is the concentration in the liquid over the concentration in various crystalline phases. Individual symbols are results from synthetic systems reported by Green et al. (1971) - × ; Masuda and Kushiro (1970) - @ ; and Shimizu and Akimoto (1971) - O. The estimates shown by vertical bars are based on studies of phenocrysts in basaltic rocks (Schnetzler and Philpotts, 1970; Shih, personal communication). It is clear that the uncertainty in these constraints is still very significant. Some of this uncertainty clearly results from variations in the distribution coefficients with the bulk composition of the solid phases. Green et al. (1971) have shown, for example, that the A1 content of clinopyroxene significantly effects the dis- tribution of trivalent REE between a liquid and the coexisting clinopyroxene. In particular, the ratios "l~ 1/c!°x --~EE are much higher for diopside than augite. Furthermore, subcalcic clinopyroxenes may have higher ratios than pure diopside. The relatively high values in the calculations made here are, at least in part, justified by this observation; i.e. the phase undergoing melting is not the same as the common pyroxene observed as phenocrysts in basaltic rocks. The distribution coefficients for divalent europium are entirely based on synthetic studies. The values for Sr are based both on experimental data and on phenocryst data. The solid lines are those used in model calculations shown in Figures 14 and 15. largely based on phenocryst-basalt groundmass pairs, with some key additions from recent experimental measurements. With regard to the Moon, the significant values in this figure are the clinopyroxene/basalt liquid values for the trivalent REE and the plagioclase/basalt liquid values for Sr + + and Eu + +. The data shown in Figure 11 sug- gests that in the absence of garnet, clinopyroxene will be the dominant solid phase carrying the REE in an ultramafic assemblage, while plagioclase is the dominant solid phase carrying Eu + + and Sr + +. It is, of course, also possible that accessory phases such as apatite, perovskite, sphene, or zircon may carry a significant proportion of 142 PAUL W, GAST some of the elements under consideration. However, it is important to note that the effect of these phases can only be significant if they persist in the presence of a signi- ficant amount of liquid phase. In an equilibrium model, the effect of a minor phase must disappear as soon as that phase is eliminated from the system. In the case of apatite, we must postulate that the initial system must contain sufficient P2Os to stabilize a phosphate phase. The low concentration of phosphorus in the mare basalts along with the relatively small amounts of partial melting generally inferred to produce these basalts suggests that phosphorus is very rare in the lunar interior; that is, makes up less than 0.01~ of the source of these basalts. There is no evidence at present that equilibrium systems with such low concentrations of P205 will contain a phosphate as a stable phase. As a first approximation, the effect of accessory minerals in the equi- librium model will be neglected. However, incomplete specification of the phase com- position of the lunar interior may be a significant omission in the calculations that follow. Phases such as perovskite and melilite may be particularly significant since they contain sites that could accommodate large divalent and trivalent ions. A series of model calculations for two possible phase compositions are shown in Figures 14 and 15. The distribution coefficients used in these calculations are shown in Figure 13. These values have been chosen to maximize the concentration of most ele- ments in the liquid. The choice of distribution coefficients for clinopyroxene is parti- cularly crucial. The rather arbitrary use of high values is probably justified by the evi- dence that diopside excludes trivalent REE more effectively than augite. The two phase compositions used in these calculations anticipate the later conclusion that the Ca and A1 content of the Moon decreased toward the lunar interior. The high plagioclase as- semblage represents a six- to eightfold enrichment in the concentration of these ele- 300 0.25% MODEL A tHIGH Ca~AL~ I00 9O zo8° ~ 9% 60' 5o j.._. ~5~ . u-, 40, 30 .... 35% 35 ~ -- 20' I I I I I I I I I I Ba U La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Lu Sr Fig. 14. Calculated abundance patterns using model of Shaw (1970). Phase composition is pla- gioclase 35 ~, clinopyroxene 20 ~, orthopyroxene 25 ~, and olivine and spinel 20 ~. Values shown on each line are the percentages of liquid at the time of extraction. THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 143 '~ B a. I f I I [ I I I I I I Ba U La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Dy Er Yb Sr Fig. 15. Calculated abundance patterns using model of Shaw (1970). Phase composition is pla- gioclase 16 %, clinopyroxene 16 %, orthopyroxene 38 %, and olivine and spinel 40 %. Values shown on each line are the percentages of liquid at the time of extraction. ments over that of chondrites. The low plagioclase composition represents a two- to fourfold enrichment. The approximate bulk compositions for both of these assem- blages, along with bulk compositions given by Ringwood and Essene (1970), are shown in Table II. It is quite clear that the simple model used here can explain the basic characteristics of the abundance patterns inferred for lunar basaltic liquids if plagioclase is present in the lunar interior. Indeed, the abundance of plagioclase dominates over all other factors in determining the depth of the strontium and europium anomalies. Both cases illustrated in Figures 14 and 15 show that it is difficult to produce the ex- treme enrichments of LIL elements by simply varying the degree of partial melting of a given phase composition, even when the distribution coefficients have been chosen to favor the concentration of these elements into the liquid. The model calculations show that plausible amounts of partial melting will not produce some of the observed liquids from a source with chondritic concentrations of the LIL elements. The exact answer to this question depends on the ability to extract and concentrate small amounts of liquid evenly dispersed through a solid. There is no well-established or definite limit to this process. It seems likely, however, as the proportion of liquid approaches 1-2% by volume, it will be extracted or physically separated from the residual solid with ever increasing difficulty. In any case, the phase compositions and distribution coefficients used in the model illustrated here suggest that even infinitesimally small amounts of liquid will not be extremely enriched in the trace elements under consideration. For the rather arbitrary limit of 1% partial melting, the concentration of LIL elements in the source of the Apollo 12 liquid probably must be 3-5 times that of chondrites. For similar assumptions, the KREEP liquids require a source with 7-9 times the chondritic concentration of these elements. Ca~AL~ ,MODERATE MODEL 10090 144 PAUL W. GAST One of the characteristics of the trace element patterns seen in Figures 14 and 15 is a relatively wide range of europium concentrations compared to the range of ob- served strontium concentrations. If the europium distribution coefficients for plagio- clase and basaltic liquid is unity or less, this characteristic difference in the behavior of the europium and strontium becomes difficult to explain unless it is assumed that the Eu+++/Eu ++ ratio is greater than 0.05. The calculated values illustrated in Figures 14 and 15 assume that this ratio is 1/10. Alternatively, one could have assumed that the Eu + ÷ distribution coefficient is between 1.1 and 1.3. The variations in Sr/Eu ratios provide a significant constraint on partial melting models that will not be discussed here except to note that this variation can only be ex- plained by assuming that the concentration of refractory LIL elements in the source of different basalts must vary if we begin with the assumption that the relative abundance of these elements is chondritic and assume that both liquids are produced by similar mechanisms. The possibility that LIL element abundance patterns similar to those observed for the KREEP basalts can be produced by fractional crystallization processes has been discussed in several previous papers (Gast et al., 1970; Gast and Hubbard, 1970; Hubbard et al., 1971b). In order to further illustrate the difficulties associated with this hypothesis, let us consider what is involved in forming such a residual liquid from a plausible starting liquid. Assume that the starting or initial liquid is probably similar to the initial liquid from which one might derive an anorthositic cumulate. For ex- ample, it will have the following properties: (1) It is rich in normative plagioclase or A120 a, (2) It is rich in normative olivine with a relatively high content of forsterite, i.e. it has 10-14% MgO and 8-10% FeO, (3) It has a Cr203 content similar to that of mare basalts, i.e. 0.4-0.5%, and (4) It has a chondritic LIL abundance pattern where the abundance of these elements is 15-20 times that of average chondrites. (This is 2-3 times the abundance of howardite or eucritic achondrites.) In order to produce the KREEP LIL element patterns from such a liquid, it is clearly necessary that it must crystallize both plagioclase and olivine and/or pyroxene. The two KREEP characteristics that are not difficult to produce are (1) The twenty- to thirtyfold increase in uranium and cerium concentration which immediately implies that the residual liquid is less than 5% of the initial or starting liquid and (2) The rela- tively high Mg/Fe + Mg ratio of the KREEP basalts. The latter characteristic can only be achieved if there is substantial crystallization of ilmenite or other iron-rich oxides along with olivine and orthopyroxene. The chromium content of KREEP basalts (0.2%) is somewhat lower than that of the presumed starting liquid. It is well known, however (Gast, 1968b; Ringwood and Essene, 1970) that Cr is very rapidly depleted in liquids that crystallize substantial amounts of ortho- or clinopyroxene. A residual liquid of the type proposed should be virtually free of Cr; that is, it should contain less than 100 ppm. This is clearly not observed. Finally, the extreme Eu and Sr depletions observed in the KREEP basalts require that plagioclase must dominate over ferro magnesium minerals during fractional crystallization. This will have two effects: (1) It will result in extensive depletion of the residual liquid and A120 a and (2) it will strongly deplete the residual THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 145 liquid in Sr, i.e. the residual liquid will have a much lower Sr concentration than the initial liquid (see e.g. Gast and Hubbard, 1970). Neither of these characteristics are observed for KREEP basalts. In summary, a variety of qualitative characteristics that are predicted for residual or extensively differentiated igneous liquids are in strong contrast with those actually ob- served for KREEP basalts. It is concluded that these basalts do not represent frac- tional crystallization products and that the most plausible explanation of their ob- served characteristics is the partial melting mechanism similar to the one discussed above. The primitive Ca- and Al-rich outer layer inferred from the KREEP basalts also suggests a rather straightforward origin for the widespread occurrence of very plagioclase-rich rocks. Complete melting of such a layer by external heating or release of accretional energy during the terminal phases of lunar accretion would produce a liquid that would naturally give rise to large quantities of liquidus plagioclase. The chemical compositions and petrologic characteristics of the more abundant ig- neous rocks that occur on the surface of the Moon thus suggest the following con- clusions: (1) Partial melting of a primitive U-, Ca-, and Al-rich feldspathic assemblage made up of about one-third plagioclase took place about 4.4 billion years ago. This primitive source contained 5-10 times the refractory LIL element content ofchondrites, (2) Partial melting (3-30~) of a Fe/Mg-rich source with abundant Fe-rich pyroxene took place between 3.8 and 3.0 billion years ago. This source may also have contained small amounts of plagioclase, i.e. ~ 10~. The abundance of LIL refractory elements in this region was 2-4 times that of chondrites, (3) Plagioclase-rich (anorthositic) highland rocks were formed by complete or nearly complete melting of the upper por- tion of the Al-rich zone that produced the KREEP basalts, and (4) It is suggested that the dark halo materials will have higher Fe/Mg ratios and abundances of volatile ele- ments than the mare basalts. The depth of formation of lunar volcanic liquids must be intimately involved with the early thermal evolution of the Moon and the initial thermal condition of the Moon. Thermal history calculations (McConnell and Gast, 1972) suggest that the upper AI- and Ca-rich zone proposed here must extend to a depth of at least 150 km in order to produce the KREEP basalts. Similarly, the source of the mare basalts may extend from depths of 150-450 kin. When combined with initial temperatures that decrease from 1300K at the surface to 270K at the center of the Moon, the radioactive heat production inferred from the partial melting models given here provides a self-con- sistent thermal evolution that includes very early shallow melting and virtual cessation of melting 2 billion years ago at depths of 600-800 km. The composition of the deep interior - below 400 km - of the Moon can be con- strained in two ways: (1) The U and K content must be consistent with the observed thermal history and present state of the Moon and (2) The proposed interior must give rise to the correct moment of inertia. Neither of these constraints can at present be applied in a quantitative way. Hays (1971) has shown that the U content of the interior is probably much lower than that here inferred for the outer 400 km of the Moon. In addition, Wetherill (1968) and Ringwood and Essene (1970) have shown that the Ca 146 PAUL W. GAST and A1 content of the deep interior must be limited by compositions that will not con- tain garnet-rich assemblages at high pressures. This constraint probably requires that the A1 content of the interior must be much lower than that here inferred for the upper 400 km. It is, therefore, concluded that the primitive Moon had a zoned structure in which the abundance of refractory elements such as Ca, AI, U, and REE increased going from the interior to the surface of the Moon. Such a zoned structure places significant constraints on any theory of lunar origin. These inferences lead to the further significant conclusion that the matter that made up our sister planet was separated from more primitive matter over a wide range of temperatures. This conclusion is, in fact, quite in accord with similar observations derived from the chemistry of meteorites and the chemistry of the Earth. The abundan- ce of a large number of volatile elements, e.g. Bi, T1, Pb, Zn, Br, C1, and others, in chondritic meteorites varies by several orders of magnitude. These abundance varia- tions have been elegantly interpreted in terms of temperatures of accretion (Larimer and Anders, 1967). Variations in the abundance of refractory elements in meteorites have also been ob- served (Ahrens and von Michaelis, 1969). The abundance of Ca and A1 varies by a factor of 2 or more in chondritic meteorites and by a factor of more than 6 in all mete- orites. Other elements, notably strontium and europium, vary by similar factors. The relative abundance of Ca and A1 is much more constant in these objects than that ob- served in terrestrial and lunar igneous rocks. This argues against the possible expla- nation of these variations by igneous differentiation processes. Detailed studies of several Type 3 carbonaceous chondrites; in particular, the meteorites Allende and Leoville (Marvin et al., 1970; Keil and Fuchs, 1971) provide evidence for even more extensive enrichment of this group of refractory elements. The observations for the Earth are less detailed than those for meteorites. The low relative abundance of alkali metals; in particular, K and Rb, appears to be well-established (Gast, 1960; Wasserburg et al., 1964). The evidence that the Earth is depleted in other more volatile elements; for example, T1, C1, and Br, is also rather clear. Enrichment of the Earth in refractory elements has been suggested as a hypothesis (Gast, 1968a, 1972). The combined observations made on meteorites, the Earth, and the Moon suggest that the fractionation of volatile (gaseous) and refractory (solid) materials in the early solar system took place over a wide range of temperatures. When and where this se- paration occurred is an open question. Two classes of explanations can be noted. First, that the separation takes place during the condensation of the gas to small solid bodies; that is, the release of gravitational potential energy and local gravitational fields had no role in the chemical fractionation; or, alternatively, that the chemical fractionation was associated with the rapid formation and heating of planetary-sized objects - the energy source for this heating coming from the release of gravitational potential ener- gy. The loss of very substantial hot, dense, atmospheres from planetary-sized objects is unavoidable in the second type of explanation. The relative importance of these tWO mechanisms in separating volatile from non- volatile material during the formation of the planets will not be explored in detail in THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE MOON 147 this report. It is intuitively clear, however, that five- to tenfold enrichments in refrac- tory elements by vaporization of more volatile material is unlikely or difficult for Moon-sized objects. In other words, refractory element enrichment on the scale pro- posed here implies chemical fractionation during condensation from a gas as the most plausible mechanism that can account for the observations. References Adler, I., Trombka, J., Gerard, J., Lowman, P., Schmadebeck, R., Blodget, H., Eller, E., Yin, L., Lamothe, R., Gorenstein, P., and Bjorkholm, P. : 1972, Science 175, 436-440. Ahrens, L. H. and yon Michaelis, H. : 1969, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 6, 304-308. Albee, A. L. and Chodos, A. A.: 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 135-157. Anders, E. : 1965, Meteoritica 26, 17-25. Anders, E., Ganapathy, R., Keays, R. R., Laul, J. C., and Morgan, J. W.: 1971, Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1021-1036. Apollo Soil Survey: 1971, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 12, 49-54. Baedecker, P. A., Schaudy, R., Elzie, J. L., Kimberlin, J., and Wasson, J. T.: 1971, Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1037-1061. Brett, P. R.: 1971, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 35, 203-221. Crocker, J. H. : 1969, in Handbook of Geochemistry 11-1 (ed. by K. H. Wedepohl et al.), Springer- Verlag, Section 18, pp. 1--4. Ehmann, W. D. : 1967, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 357-376. Ehmann, W. D., Baedecker, P. A., and McKown, D. M. : 1970, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 34, 493- Engel, A. E. J., Engel, C. G., and Havens, R. G.: 1965, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 76, 719-734. Ganapathy, R., Keays, R. R., Laul, J. C., and Anders, E.: 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 111%1142. Gast, P. W.: 1960, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 1287-1297. Gast, P. W. : 1968a, in History of the Earth's Crust, (ed. by Robert Phinney), Princeton University Press, pp. 15-27. Gast, P. W. : 1968b, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 32, 1057-1086. Gast, P. W.: 1970, in Phase Transformations and the Earth's Interior, (ed. by A. E. Ringwood and D. H. Green), North-Holland Publishing Company, p. 246. Gast, P. W.: 1972, in The Nature of the Solid Earth, (ed. by Eugene C. Robertson), McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp. 19-40. Gast, P. W. and Hubbard, N. J. : 1970, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 10, 94-100. Gast, P. W., Hubbard, N. J., and Wiesmann, H. : 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1143-1163. Gibson, E. K. and Hubbard, N. J. : 1972, Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., in press. Goldschmidt, V. M. : 1954, Geochemistry, (ed. by Alex Muir), Oxford, Clarendon Press. Green, D. H. : 1970, Trans. Leicester Lit. Philos. Soc. 64, 26-54. Green, D. H. and Ringwood, A. E. : 1967, Contr. Mineral. Petrol. 15, 103-190. Green, D. H., Ringwood, A. E. Ware, N. G., Hibberson, W. O., Major, A., and Kiss, E.: 1971,Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 601-615. Haskin, L.A., Allen, R. O., Helmke, P. A., Paster, T. P., Anderson, M. R., Korotev, R. L., and Zweifel, K. A.: 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1213-1231. Hays, J. F. : 1971, Phys. Earth Planetary Int. 5, in press. Herr, W., Herpers, U., Michel, R., Abdel Rassoul, A. A., and Woelfte, R. : 1971, Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1337-1341. Hubbard, N. J. and Gast, P. W. : 1971, Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 999-1020. Hubbard, N. J., Gast, P. W., Rhodes, M., and Wiesmann, H.: 1972, Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., in press. Hubbard, N. J., Meyer, C. Jr., Gast, P. W., and Wiesmann, H.: 1971a, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 10, 341-350. • Hubbard, N. J., Gast, P. W., Meyer, C., Nyquist, L. E., Shih, C.'~a6d Wiesmann, H.: 1971b, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 13, 71. 148 PAUL W. GAST Kay, R. W.: 1970, Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University. Kay, R. W., Hubbard, N. J., and Gast, P. W.: 1970, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 1585-1613. Keil, K. and Fuchs, L. H.: 1971, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 12, 184-190. Larimer, J. W. and Anders, E. : 1967, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 1239-1270. Laul, J. C., Keays, R. R., Ganapathy, R., Anders, E., and Morgan, J. W.: 1972, Geoehim. Cosmo- ehim. Acta, in press. Lieberman, K. W. and Ehmann, W. D. : 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 6279-6287. Lunar Sample Preliminary Examination Team: 1972, Science 175, 363-375. Manson, V.: 1967, in Basalts: The Poldervaart Treatise on Rocks of Basaltic Compos#ion 1, (ed. by H. H. Hess and A. Poldervaart), Interscience, pp. 215-271. Marvin, U. B., Wood, J. A., and Dickey, J. S., Jr. : 1970, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 7, 346-350. Marvin, U. B., Wood, J. A., Taylor, G. J., Reid, J. B., Jr., Powell, B. N., Dickey, J. S., Jr., and Bower, J. F. : 1971, Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 679-699. Masuda, A. and Kushiro, I. : 1970, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 42, 26-49. McConnell, R. K. and Gast, P. W.: 1972, this issue, p. 41. McCord, T. B., Charette, M. P., Johnson, T. V., Lebofsky, L. A., Pieters, C., and Adams, J. B. : 1972, J. Geophys. Res., in press. Metzger, A. E., Trombka, J. I., Peterson, L. E., Reedy, R. C., and Arnold, J. R. : 1972, Lunar Science III, Revised abstracts of papers presented at the Third Lunar Sci. Conf. (ed. by C. Watkins), pp. 540-541. Meyer, C., Jr., Brett, R., Hubbard, N. J., Morrison, D. A., McKay, D. S., Aitken, F. K., Takeda, H., and Schonfeld, E. : 1971, Proe. Seeond Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 393-411. O'Hara, M. J., Biggar, G. M., Richardson, S. W., Ford, C. E., and Jamieson, B. G.: 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 695-710. O'Keefe, J. : 1970, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6565-6575. Papanastassiou, D. A. and Wasserburg, G. J.: 1971a, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 11, 37-62. Papanastassiou, D. A. and Wasserburg, G. J. : 1971b, Earth Planetary Sei. Letters 12, 36-49. Papanastassiou, D. A. and Wasserburg, G. J.: 1972, Earth Planetary Sei. Letters 13, 368-374. Philpotts, J. : 1970, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 9, 257-269. Reed, G. W. and Jovanovi6, S. : 1971, Proe. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1261-1276. Reid, A. M., Meyer, C., Jr., Harmon, R. S., and Brett, P. R. : 1970, Earth Planetary Sei. Letters 9, 1-5. Reid, A. M., Ridley, W. I., Harmon, R. S., Warner, J. L., Brett, P. R., Jake~, P., and Brown, R. W. : 1972, Geochim. Cosmochim. Aeta, in press. Ringwood, A. E. : 1966, Geoehim. Cosmochim. Aeta 30, 41-104. Ringwood, A. E. and Essene, E.: 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 769-799. Ringwood, A. E., Green, D. H., and Ware, N. G.: 1972, Lunar Science III, Revised abstracts of papers presented at the Third Lunar Sci. Conf. (ed. by C. Watkins), p. 654. Schnetzler, C. C. and Philpotts, J. A. : 1970, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 34, 331-340. Shaw, D. M. : 1970, Geochim. Cosmochim. Aeta 34, 237-243. Shimizu, N. and Akimoto, S. : 1971, Earth Planetary S¢i. Letters 13, 134-138. Smith, J. V., Anderson, A. T., Newton, R. C., Olsen, E. J., and Wyllie, P. J. : 1970, J. Geol. 78, 381- Soderblom, L. A. and Lebofsky, L. A. : 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 279-296. Tatsumoto, M.: 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1595-1612. Taylor, S. R., Capp, A. C., Graham, A. L., and Blake, P. H. : 1969, Contr. Mineral. Petrol. 23, 1-26. Turekian, K. K. and Wedepohl, K. H. : 1961, Bull. Geol. Soe. Am. 72, 175-192. Vinogradov, A. P.: 1971, Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 1-16. Wakita, H. and Schmitt, R. A. : 1970, Earth Planetary Sci. Letters 9, 169-176. Walker, D., Longhi, J., and Hays, J, F. : 1972, Lunar Science III, Revised abstracts of papers presented at the Third Lunar Sci. Conf. (ed. by. C. Watkins), p. 770-772. Wasserburg, G. J., MacDonald, G. J. F., Houle, F., and Fowler, W. A. : 1964, Science 143, 465-467. Wasserburg, G. J. and Papanastassiou, D. A.: 1971, Earth Planetary Sei. Letters 13, 97. Wasson, J. T. and Baedecker, P. A. : 1970, Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1741-1750. Wetherill, G. W. : 1968, Science 160, 1256-1257. Wood, J. A., Dickey, J. S., Jr., Marvin, U. B., and Powell, B. N. : 1970, Proe. Apollo 11 Lunar Sei. Conf. 1, 965-988.
Discover Space – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 1972
Keywords: Rock Type; Surface Chemistry; Igneous Rock; Deep Part; Element Abundance
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.