Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Non-professional perceptions of 'good death': A study of the views of hospice care patients and relatives of deceased hospice care patients

Non-professional perceptions of 'good death': A study of the views of hospice care... This is a qualitative exploration of non-professional perceptions of 'good' death. Hospice patients and the relatives of deceased patients provided story examples of 'good'/'not good' deaths which had happened to people known to them. Contributions were analysed in order to identify perceptions of what were the core features of 'good' death and how 'good' death was formulated in real life contexts. Patients provided a more limited range of features in their contributions than did relatives, suggesting divergent expectations. Of particular interest was how those 'good' death 'ingredients' were mixed in the crucible of the dying experience. Three frames of reference were identified within which participants understood death and dying—an acknowledgement of tension and paradox, contextualiztion within the life lived and an attitude of flexible realism. What emerged was a dynamic process whereby participants portrayed attempts to get as near as possible to what is desired within the often changing limitations of life. 'Good' death terminology fails to convey adequately the pragmatism and complexity of this process. 'Good enough' death may convey more appropriately that preferred goals do exist but that preferences often have to be negotiated in a context of limitation and contingency. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Mortality Taylor & Francis

Non-professional perceptions of 'good death': A study of the views of hospice care patients and relatives of deceased hospice care patients

Mortality , Volume 7 (2): 19 – Jul 1, 2002
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/non-professional-perceptions-of-apos-good-death-apos-a-study-of-the-jtwTdACcL4

References (24)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1469-9885
eISSN
1357-6275
DOI
10.1080/13576270220136294
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This is a qualitative exploration of non-professional perceptions of 'good' death. Hospice patients and the relatives of deceased patients provided story examples of 'good'/'not good' deaths which had happened to people known to them. Contributions were analysed in order to identify perceptions of what were the core features of 'good' death and how 'good' death was formulated in real life contexts. Patients provided a more limited range of features in their contributions than did relatives, suggesting divergent expectations. Of particular interest was how those 'good' death 'ingredients' were mixed in the crucible of the dying experience. Three frames of reference were identified within which participants understood death and dying—an acknowledgement of tension and paradox, contextualiztion within the life lived and an attitude of flexible realism. What emerged was a dynamic process whereby participants portrayed attempts to get as near as possible to what is desired within the often changing limitations of life. 'Good' death terminology fails to convey adequately the pragmatism and complexity of this process. 'Good enough' death may convey more appropriately that preferred goals do exist but that preferences often have to be negotiated in a context of limitation and contingency.

Journal

MortalityTaylor & Francis

Published: Jul 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.