Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Notes on the Three Qumran-Type Yadin Fragments Leading to a Discussion of Identification, Attribution, Provenance, and Names

Notes on the Three Qumran-Type Yadin Fragments Leading to a Discussion of Identification,... Abstract The identification of the three Qumran-type Yadin fragments as Qumran Cave 11 fragments is dubious in one case, and erroneous in the other two cases. This raises the more general question how we need to deal with unprovenanced Dead Sea Scroll fragments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Dead Sea Discoveries Brill

Notes on the Three Qumran-Type Yadin Fragments Leading to a Discussion of Identification, Attribution, Provenance, and Names

Dead Sea Discoveries , Volume 19 (2): 198 – Jan 1, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/notes-on-the-three-qumran-type-yadin-fragments-leading-to-a-discussion-jsurr1DZR5

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0929-0761
eISSN
1568-5179
DOI
10.1163/156851712X644659
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The identification of the three Qumran-type Yadin fragments as Qumran Cave 11 fragments is dubious in one case, and erroneous in the other two cases. This raises the more general question how we need to deal with unprovenanced Dead Sea Scroll fragments.

Journal

Dead Sea DiscoveriesBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2012

Keywords: Qumran; fragments; provenance

There are no references for this article.