Notes on the Three Qumran-Type Yadin Fragments Leading to a Discussion of Identification, Attribution, Provenance, and Names
Notes on the Three Qumran-Type Yadin Fragments Leading to a Discussion of Identification,...
Tigchelaar, Eibert
2012-01-01 00:00:00
Abstract The identification of the three Qumran-type Yadin fragments as Qumran Cave 11 fragments is dubious in one case, and erroneous in the other two cases. This raises the more general question how we need to deal with unprovenanced Dead Sea Scroll fragments.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngDead Sea DiscoveriesBrillhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/brill/notes-on-the-three-qumran-type-yadin-fragments-leading-to-a-discussion-jsurr1DZR5
Notes on the Three Qumran-Type Yadin Fragments Leading to a Discussion of Identification, Attribution, Provenance, and Names
Abstract The identification of the three Qumran-type Yadin fragments as Qumran Cave 11 fragments is dubious in one case, and erroneous in the other two cases. This raises the more general question how we need to deal with unprovenanced Dead Sea Scroll fragments.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.