Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Catalysts for CO2/epoxide ring-opening copolymerization

Catalysts for CO2/epoxide ring-opening copolymerization Catalysts for CO /epoxide ring-opening rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org copolymerization † † G. Trott ,P.K.Saini and C. K. Williams Review Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK Cite this article:TrottG,SainiPK,Williams CK. 2016 Catalysts for CO /epoxide This article summarizes and reviews recent progress ring-opening copolymerization. Phil.Trans.R. in the development of catalysts for the ring-opening Soc. A 374: 20150085. copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0085 The copolymerization is an interesting method to add value to carbon dioxide, including from waste sources, and to reduce pollution associated with commodity Accepted: 9 November 2015 polymer manufacture. The selection of the catalyst is of critical importance to control the composition, One contribution of 15 to a discussion meeting properties and applications of the resultant polymers. issue ‘Catalysis making the world a better This review highlights and exemplifies some key recent findings and hypotheses, in particular using place’. examples drawn from our own research. Subject Areas: inorganic chemistry 1. Introduction Keywords: The ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP) of carbon catalysis, polycarbonate, ring-opening dioxide and epoxides is an interesting method to copolymerization, CO synthesize a range of aliphatic polycarbonates (figure 1) [1–5]. The reaction was discovered more than 40 years Author for correspondence: ago and has since continued to attract attention as a means to reduce pollution associated with polymer C. K. Williams manufacture and to ‘add value’ to carbon dioxide [1]. e-mail: [email protected] It should be made clear that the use of CO in any chemical manufacturing process is unable to make a large impact on overall CO levels in the atmosphere. However, it remains important to pursue CO utilization as a means to reduce emissions, particularly those associated with existing, large-scale industrial processes and as an economic driver to support carbon capture [6,7]. The ROCOP process is strongly dependent on the selection of the catalyst, with various homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts having been reported [5,8–15]. The focus for this review article will be to highlight and exemplify some of the key findings in this area These authors contributed equally to this work. 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... common epoxides catalyst R R¢ R¢ CHO PO Figure 1. The ROCOP of carbon dioxide and epoxides to produce aliphatic polycarbonates. (Online version in colour.) of catalysis, in particular using examples drawn from our own research. The intention is not to provide a comprehensive review of all known catalysts; indeed, such reviews are already available [5,8–15]. The ROCOP reaction is a rare example of a truly catalytic process with the potential to deliver large-scale quantities of product, which genuinely consumes carbon dioxide. The most commonly studied epoxides are cyclohexene oxide (CHO) and propylene oxide (PO). Depending on the epoxide and the selectivity of the catalyst, up to 31% (polycyclohexene carbonate) or 43% (polypropylene carbonate) of the polymer mass derives from CO . The primary application for the polymer products is as low-molecular-weight (M ), (poly)hydroxyl-terminated ‘polyols’, which are widely used in the manufacture of polyurethanes [16]. Polyurethanes themselves are applied as flexible/rigid foams, adhesives, coatings and elastomers, as well as in many other areas. It has been shown that the properties of CO -derived polyols are suitable to replace polyether polyols in some applications [16,17]. Given that polyether polyols are prepared by epoxide homopolymerization, the ROCOP of CO and epoxides can also be viewed as a means to ‘replace’ a substantial portion of petrochemically derived resource (epoxide) with a renewable one (CO ). A recent detailed life-cycle analysis study compared these two types of polyols, showing significant reductions (approx. 20%) in both fossil resource depletion and greenhouse gas emissions for the CO -derived polymers [18]. Furthermore, the replacement of fossil-derived epoxides is economically attractive and is stimulating a number of commercialization studies [16,19](http://www.empowermaterials. com/; http://www.novomer.com/; http://www.covestro.com/en/Sustainability/Productions/ Polyols; http://www.econic-technologies.com/ [accessed 4 September 2015]). It has also recently been demonstrated that ROCOP catalysts are compatible with carbon capture and storage (CCS) processes [20]. Studies have shown that some homogeneous magnesium catalysts can be used in polymerizations where the carbon dioxide is captured at a CCS demonstrator plant attached to a UK power station. The catalysts showed near-equivalent performances using such captured gases compared to using ‘pure’ carbon dioxide. Furthermore, the catalyst showed a high tolerance to various impurities present in captured CO , including water, N , CO, thiols 2 2 and amines [20]. 2. Polymerization pathways and mechanisms A range of different catalysts are known but all catalysts contain metals, with Zn(II), Co(III) and Cr(III) being particularly common [5,8–14]. Prior to an examination of these catalysts, it is worth considering the series of reactions that are proposed to occur at the metal active site during polymerization, the major ones of which are illustrated in figure 2 [3,11]. The polymerization is initiated by coordination of an epoxide molecule and the subsequent ring opening by the nucleophilic attack of a carbonate group or ligand (X), so as to form a metal alkoxide intermediate. During chain propagation, carbon dioxide inserts into the metal alkoxide intermediate to form a metal carbonate species. The metal coordinates another molecule of epoxide, and nucleophilic attack by the carbonate group leads to the ring opening of the epoxide and formation of a new metal alkoxide species. Propagation therefore involves the ‘cycling’ between metal alkoxide and rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... initiation CO MX MM X O O O propagation O O O M R MM O O O R desired catalytic cycle O O O R OO formation of ether linkages metal carbonate metal alkoxide CO M R OO formation of cyclic by-product chain transfer R¢OH M P M R¢ H P O O O Figure 2. Catalytic cycle of CO /epoxide copolymerization. carbonate intermediates. The polymerization is terminated by exposure to conditions/reagents that lead to hydrolysis of the growing polymer chain and formation of a polymer chain end-capped with a hydroxyl group. There are also side reactions within this process, the proportions of which depend on the conditions, substrate and catalyst selected. The formation of ether linkages in the polymer chain can occur due to the occurrence of a metal alkoxide attack on an epoxide molecule instead of CO insertion. Such linkages change the polymer properties, which may be beneficial depending on the application, but nevertheless reduce the CO sequestered in the polymer backbone [16,17]. Five-membered ring cyclic carbonate by-products can also form; indeed, this is the thermodynamic product of the reaction between CO and epoxides and thus favoured under forcing conditions. The cyclic carbonates can form by depolymerization or ‘back-biting’ reactions; the extent of these depend on the catalyst and the ceiling temperature for the given polymer [21,22]. The cyclic carbonates can also form ‘off-metal’ and are particularly common, and sometimes problematic, contaminants when co-catalysts or ionic additives are applied [5,13]. For some types of catalyst, most commonly with metal salen catalysts, it is proposed that the addition of ionic co-catalysts leads to the polymer chains being in equilibrium between metal coordination and ‘free’ anionic polymer chains [5]. Such ‘off-metal’ chains have been shown to undergo cyclization to form cyclic carbonate by-products [23]. Chain transfer reactions also need to be considered. These reactions occur when the polymerizations are conducted under so-called ‘immortal’ conditions in the presence of protic compounds, such as alcohols, amines and water, among others [24–27]. When such protic reagents are present, the metal-alkoxide-terminated polymer chain is proposed to be in rapid exchange with the protic reagent, generating metal alkoxides and ‘free’ hydroxyl-terminated polymer chains. The chain transfer processes are proposed to occur more rapidly than propagation, leading to highly controlled polymerizations where the M of the polymer is determined by both the catalyst and chain transfer agent (protic reagent) concentrations. It is worth noting that in ROCOP the polycarbonate M is commonly experimentally observed to be rather lower than those expected for living polymerizations (where the M would depend only on the catalyst concentration) [25]. This is due to the presence or formation of chain transfer agents, such as diols, rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... Zn NC CN NC Co CN type I Zn NC CN O O 5 1 X=H O, Cl, Br, ROH Zn 2 Zn Zn 2 3 Figure 3. One of the crystal structures for zinc glutarate and a generic illustration of the structure of the repeat unit in zinc- cobaltdoublemetalcyanidecatalysts.Adaptedwithpermissionfrom[38].Copyright(2004)AmericanChemicalSociety.(Online version in colour.) in the epoxide monomers used [28–32]. In fact, the exploitation of catalysts able to operate under immortal polymerization conditions, i.e. where such chain transfer agents are added in larger excess compared to the catalyst, is essential to selectively prepare the polyols that are required in polyurethane manufacture [18,20,24]. The catalysts for ROCOP have some general features: the metals are Lewis acids; the metals’ redox reactivity should be limited; the metal alkoxide and carbonate intermediates are labile; and initiating ligands (X) include alkoxides, carboxylates, halides and other anionic groups [5,8–14]. It is common in this area of catalysis that dinuclear or bimetallic catalysts show good performances and bimetallic pathways are proposed to accelerate epoxide ring opening [10]. Finally, the polymerization catalysts should ideally be colourless, odourless, inexpensive and have low toxicity, as they may contaminate the polymer product. In this context, there have been a number of reports of strategies to remove and recycle homogeneous catalysts [33–35]. 3. Heterogeneous catalysts The two major classes of heterogeneous catalysts are zinc glutarate (or other carboxylates) and double metal cyanides [4,36–52]. Both are well known, and in some cases industrially applied, as epoxide homopolymerization catalysts [52]. For copolymerizations using carbon dioxide, these heterogeneous catalysts require much more forcing conditions than homogeneous species. In particular, high pressures of carbon dioxide are necessary, and perfectly alternating enchainment does not occur, but rather ether-enriched polycarbonates are produced. Zinc glutarate has been extensively studied, and two features stand out that increase activity: (i) the addition of ethylsulfinate groups and (ii) an increase in crystallinity of the catalyst [4,36–44]. The most commonly studied double metal cyanide catalyst is Zn (CoCN ) (figure 3), although 3 6 2 mixed Zn/Fe(III) species are also reported. These catalysts are typically applied as part of mixtures with so-called ‘complexation’ agents, including salts, alcohols and solvents [45–52]. They generally show very high activities but low CO uptakes; indeed, they commonly yield poly(ether carbonates) rather than perfectly alternating copolymers. Studying the mechanisms of such heterogeneous catalysts is very challenging; nevertheless, theoretical and experimental studies have led to the proposal that bimetallic polymerization processes are important. In particular, one study proposes that the active sites in zinc carboxylates should be separated by 4–5 Å [44]. 4. Homogeneous catalysts The common homogeneous catalysts can be classified into two broad types: rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... (a) (b) Ph 3 4 R R N N NN Ph Al X Ph M 2 2 R OO R N N X 1 1 R R Ph X = Cl, OMe, Me, OR M = metal; X = co-ligand (c)(d ) OAc – + +– X NBu Bu N X 3 3 NN N N Co Co O O OO N HN OAc X NBu Bu N X 3 3 – + + – Figure 4. Bicomponent catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerization. (a) General porphyrin structure [32,53,63–65]. (b) General salen structure [55,57,66]. (c) Bifunctional salcy complex tethered to piperidinium moieties [67]. (d) Bifunctional salen complex tethered to quaternary ammonium groups [33]. (a) Bicomponent catalyst systems comprising metal(III) complexes used with co-catalysts. The catalysts are usually complexes of Co(III), Cr(III), Mn(III) or Al(III) coordinated by ligands such as salens or porphyrins. The co-catalysts are typically ionic compounds, the most common of which is bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium (PPN) chloride (PPNCl), or Lewis bases, commonly 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). (b) Dinuclear or bimetallic catalysts comprising metal(II/III) complexes. Most commonly these are complexes where two metals are coordinated by tethered ‘mononucleating’ ligands, such as Zn(II) β-diiminates (BDIs) or tethered Co(II)/Cr(III) salens. There are also examples of deliberately dinucleating ligands, such as macrocyclic ligands coordinated to Zn(II), Mg(II), Co(II/III) or Fe(III). Most homogeneous catalysts operate under moderate/high pressures of CO , and usually require more than 10 bar pressure, but, in contrast to heterogeneous catalysts, they do yield highly alternating copolymers [15,53–57]. In a drive to change the polymerization process conditions, catalysts have now been developed that show high activities and perfectly alternating enchainment under low pressures of carbon dioxide, including at 1 bar pressure [58–60]. (a) Bicomponent catalysts These catalysts are used with an exogenous co-catalyst or, more recently, have the co-catalyst attached to the ancillary ligand scaffold [5,32,61–63]. The ligands are usually planar, tetradentate, dianionic compounds such as salens or porphyrins. The commonly used co-catalysts are ionic salts, such as PPNX and ammonium halides. The structures of typical catalysts in this class are illustrated in figure 4 [5,32,61–63]. rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... XX M M OO RR¢ R R¢ X = ligand, most often halide or carboxylate group Y = co-catalyst (e.g. NR X, PPNX, bulky nucleophile) M = metal and planar ancillary ligand fragment, where the ancillary ligand most often is a salen or porphyrin Figure 5. Possible pathways for epoxide ring opening by the bicomponent catalysts. The first well-defined homogeneous catalysts were metal(III) porphyrin complexes (e.g. figure 4a), which in combination with an ionic salt allowed the controlled ROCOP of CO /epoxide [68]. There have subsequently been several studies to elucidate the influences of various ligand substituents and metal centres, which revealed that Co(III) centres coordinated by porphyrin ligands, substituted with electron-withdrawing groups, showed the best performances [32,53,63,64,69–75]. However, in general, metal porphyrin catalysts have lower activities and productivities compared with metal salen catalysts. Catalysts based on salen ligands (figure 4b) are some of the most active catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerizations [5]. Darensbourg [5,22,62,76–79], Coates [15,31,55,80,81], Lu [82–87], Li [88], Nozaki [28,67,89–91], Lee [29,30,33,92–95], Rieger [66,69,96–98] and others have led the development of various [salenMX] complexes (where M = Cr(III), Co(III), Al(III)), many of which show very high rates and selectivities. Coates pioneered the application of chiral [Co(salen)] complexes as highly active CO /PO ROCOP catalysts. This class of chiral cobalt salen catalysts has been extensively investigated by a number of groups and they now show outstanding levels of regio- and stereochemical control [2,31,55]. Indeed, they have been applied in the preparation of entirely new classes of stereocomplex polycarbonates, starting from racemic mixtures of epoxides [80–82,90]. The nature of the co-catalyst is also important; as mentioned PPNX salts are widely applied. Furthermore, the amount of co-catalyst is generally optimum at 1 equivalent (versus metal complex), as greater quantities reduce activity. This is proposed to be due to competitive binding (versus epoxide) at the metal centre [99,100]. Using more than 1 equivalent of co-catalyst also increases the rate of back-biting side reactions to form cyclic carbonate products [5,57,100,101]. The co-catalyst serves a number of roles in the catalytic cycle. It is proposed that the co- catalyst binds to the metal complex in order to complete an octahedral coordination geometry and, by trans-coordination, enhances the labilization of the initiating or propagating group [5]. Additionally, the co-catalyst may act as an external nucleophile which initiates polymerization. The precise mechanisms by which such catalysts operate are rather complex and not yet fully defined, but it is generally proposed that the rate-limiting step involves epoxide ring opening rather than carbon dioxide insertion [5]. Recent kinetic studies have revealed that the polymerization rates, using metal salen catalysts, are typically dependent on catalyst concentration to a fractional order, usually between 1 and 2[89]. This is indicative of pathways involving two metal complexes and/or dimerization in the rate-limiting step. Figure 5 illustrates the two different proposed pathways for epoxide ring opening. The fractional orders in catalyst concentration could be rationalized if both pathways are feasible and occurring concurrently. Significant work has also been carried out to investigate rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... the coordination of epoxides to such catalysts [102–104]. The gas-phase binding of epoxides in Al(III) and Cr(III) salen and porphyrin complexes was studied by Chisholm and co-workers and found to follow metal Lewis acidity trends [103]. Darensbourg also showed that the ring opening of epoxides by a nucleophile was dependent on the metal–epoxide bond length and the binding enthalpies, not solely on the rate at which epoxide binding occurred [104]. It is worth noting that the coordination of co-catalysts changes the Lewis acidity of the metal centre and so would affect epoxide binding [105]. Recently, Nozaki and co-workers [89] demonstrated a theoretical model to predict the catalytic activity and selectivity in PO ROCOP using planar bicomponent catalysts. By comparing the difference between the dissociation energies for metal epoxide, carbonate and alkoxide intermediates, the preferred pathway at each stage of the catalytic cycle could be quickly estimated [89]. One challenge of exogenous co-catalysts is that, if the stoichiometry (versus catalyst) is not finely balanced, significant side reactions to produce cyclic carbonate can result. Furthermore, because the systems are bicomponent, low catalyst loadings are not generally feasible. Finally, the fractional orders in catalyst imply that dimerization may be necessary, thereby providing an entropic barrier to catalysis at low metal loading. Two strategies have been used to overcome these limitations: (i) the development of catalysts whereby the co-catalyst is attached to the ancillary ligand and (ii) the development of dinuclear salen catalysts. Increased activities, tolerance and selectivities were observed by covalently bonding the co- catalyst moiety to the catalyst ligand, removing the need to add an exogenous co-catalyst source. Nozaki first reported this phenomenon for a Co(III) salen complex, substituted with piperidinium ‘arms’ (figure 4c)[67]. This catalyst showed very high selectivity for carbonate formation (more −1 than 99%), a high turnover frequency (TOF) (250 h ) and operated at room temperature, under 14 bar pressure of CO [67]. Lee subsequently also developed various bifunctional catalysts (figure 4d) substituted with ionic groups, which have shown some of the highest activities −1 (TOF = 26 000 h ) ever reported and which are active under low catalyst loadings (1 : 25 000 catalyst : PO) [29,30,33]. Lu has also shown that a cobalt salen complex with a tethered quaternary −1 ammonium salt is highly efficient (TOF up to 5160 h ) for the terpolymerization of CHO with a range of aliphatic epoxides (such as PO) and CO [106]. (b) Dinuclear or bimetallic catalysts An important development for the field was the report from Coates, in 1998, of highly active zinc BDI catalysts [107]. These catalysts have shown good activity and selectivity for CO /CHO ROCOP, at 50 C and 7 bar pressure of CO . A wide range of [(BDI)ZnX] complexes have since been synthesized where ligand substituents exert a strong effect on activity (figure 6a) [107,111–114]. In a landmark paper investigating the mechanism, it was shown that the most active catalysts existed as ‘loosely associated’ dimers under the polymerization conditions [56]. Rate studies revealed that the order in zinc varied from 1.0 to 1.8, implicating dimeric active sites [56]. This study has inspired many others to develop dinuclear catalysts so as to increase activity and selectivity. Lee pioneered this with a series of bis(anilido-aldimine) Zn(II) complexes which −1 showed high activities (TOF = 2860 h ) in copolymerization, at 1 : 50 000 [Zn] : [epoxide] loadings (figure 6b)[108]. The activity is sensitive to the N-aryl ortho-substituents and the fluorination of the aromatic rings significantly increased the TOF values [108]. Many researchers have investigated methods to ‘tether ’ Zn(II) BDI catalysts [109,115–117]. The geometry, site and flexibility of the tether exert a significant influence over the activity, the best system for CO /CHO −1 ◦ being a dinuclear Zn(II) catalyst (figure 6c), which showed TOF values of 155 000 h , at 100 C and 30 bar [109,116,117]. Nozaki and Rieger have investigated the tethering together of two salen ligands (figure 6d)so as to target dinuclear catalysts [91,97]. When no co-catalyst was used, these catalysts operated via a bimetallic mechanism and showed improved performances (6–11 times better than the rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... (a)(b)(c) R¢¢ R¢¢ R¢¢ R¢ R R¢ NN R Zn NN O O OO N N N(TMS) MeS SMe Zn Zn Zn Zn O O (TMS) N N N 2 N N R O O R Zn F C CF 3 3 NN R¢ R¢ R¢¢ R¢¢ R¢¢ R = Me, R¢ = Pr, R¢¢ =F (d)(e) H H N O N NN N O O N Co Co MM OO X O OO O X N X N HH X = OC(O)C F 6 5 M=Mg, Zn, Co; X = OAc Figure 6. Dinuclear catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerization: (a)zincBDI complex[56]; (b) zinc bis(anilido-aldimine) catalysts [108]; (c) tethered zinc BDI complex (TMS = trimethylsilyl) [109]; (d) tethered cobalt salen complex [91]; (e) dinuclear macrocyclic catalyst [110]. monometallic counterparts). Additionally, these catalysts were able to operate at low catalyst loadings (up to 20 000, epoxide/catalyst), supporting the notion that two metal sites may be involved in the pathway [91,97]. Our research group has focused on dinuclear catalysts coordinated by macrocyclic diphenolate ancillary ligands for CO /CHO ROCOP [20,26,60,110,118–129]. The di-zinc catalyst (figure 6e) was the first catalyst to show promising activity under 1 bar pressure of CO [60]. Subsequently, we have explored a range of ligands, metals and co-ligands, including the first reports of active Fe(III) and Mg(II) catalysts for ROCOP [20,26,60,110,118–128]. Changing the metal centre significantly affects the polymerization rates, with the order of activity being Co(III) > Mg(II) > Fe(III) > Zn(II) using the same symmetrical ancillary ligand [20,26,60,110,118–128]. Kinetic studies of CO /epoxide ROCOP, using the di-zinc acetate complex, showed a first-order dependence on CHO and catalyst concentrations and zero-order dependence on CO (1–40 bar) [124]. Furthermore, the detailed analysis of the temperature dependence of the rate coefficients for both polymerization and cyclic carbonate formation enables a comparison of the relative barriers for polymerization (polycyclohexene carbonate, PCHC) versus cyclic carbonate formation (cyclohexene carbonate, CHC), the results of which are qualitatively illustrated in figure 7 [124]. It is apparent that the di-zinc catalyst shows a high selectivity for polymer formation due to the barrier to polymerization being approximately half the value for cyclic carbonate formation −1 −1 (E (PCHC) of 96.8 kJ mol and E (CHC) of 137.5 kJ mol ). a a The rate law shows a zero-order dependence of carbon dioxide pressure (1–40 bar), which suggests that, under these conditions, the ring opening of the epoxide is rate-determining. The first-order catalyst dependence also supports the proposal of dinuclear propagation pathways. Although the catalyst is dinuclear, it also has two acetate co-ligands and therefore could potentially initiate two polymer chains per catalyst [123]. The polymerization kinetics show rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... E (CHC) E (PCHC) H H N O N M M + CO N X N H H M = Mg, Zn, Co(II/III), Fe(III) X = OAc, carboxylate, alkoxide, halide reaction coordinate Figure 7. The different reaction energy barriers to the formation of PCHC versus cyclic carbonate. As part of the full −1 kinetic analysis of the polymerization, the relative barriers were determined to be E (PCHC) of 96.8 kJ mol and E (CHC) of a a −1 137.5 kJ mol . Adapted with permission from [124]. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society. N(4) N(8) Cl(1) Co(1) N(40) O(1) N(18) O(11) Co(2) N(42) N(14) Cl(2) Figure 8. The structure, as determined using X-ray crystallography, of the di-cobalt catalyst [LCo Cl (methyl imidazole)]. The 2 2 ‘bowl’ shape of the ligand is notable in the structure, as are the two faces. The convex face refers to the outside of the ‘bowl’ (i.e. where Cl and MeIm are coordinated) and the concave face refers to the inside of the ‘bowl’ (i.e. where the bridging Cl ligand is coordinated). Adapted from [122]. first-order dependences on both catalyst and epoxide concentrations, which implies that only one acetate co-ligand initiates polymerization, although more complex pathways cannot be ruled out on the basis of the rate law. This led to further investigations into the possible roles for the co-ligands. A series of di-cobalt halide catalysts were prepared, with various neutral co-ligands being coordinated to them, including pyridine, methyl imidazole and DMAP (figures 8 and 9)[122]. The complexes all showed closely related solid-state structures, with the ancillary ligand adopting energy rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... base activity –1 (B) (h ) H H N O N pyridine Co Co N X B N methyl imidazole 104 HH dimethylamino- pyridine (DMAP) Figure 9. The structures of the di-Co(II) complexes and the corresponding activities in the copolymerization of CO /CHO. Polymerization conditions: CHO : catalyst = 1000 : 1, 80 C, 1 bar CO [122]. a ‘bowl’ conformation, whereby the NH substituents occupy the same ‘face’ of the molecule. In the concave face of the molecule, a halide ligand bridges the two cobalt centres. On the opposite convex face, a halide and Lewis base donor molecule coordinate to the cobalt centres (figure 8). It was discovered that the complexes showed rates strongly dependent on the nature of the donor ligand, with DMAP complexes having low activities and those coordinated by the weaker pyridine donor being equivalently active to catalysts without any co-ligand coordination. The finding that coordination of a single DMAP molecule could significantly slow the catalysis supported the notion that polymerization dominates from the convex face of the molecule and that two metals are involved. A detailed spectroscopic and density functional theory (DFT) study also shed light on the polymerization pathways and key intermediates [123]. Using in situ attenuated total reflectance– infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy to characterize the reaction between di-zinc acetate complex and CHO showed that there were different environments for the acetate co-ligand. One of the acetate groups shows resonances consistent with attack at the CHO group, while the other has a resonance consistent with it maintaining a ‘bridging’ coordination mode between the two zinc centres. The DFT study, carried out in solution, using appropriate functionals to model the polar environment, and using the complete catalyst structure, also substantiated the proposal that, although both metals are involved in propagation, only one of the two co-ligands initiates and propagates polymerization. The remaining co-ligand remains coordinated to the metal centres and mediates the polymerization process. Indeed, it was revealed by DFT that the polymer chain ‘switches’ coordination site between the two metal centres with each monomer insertion (epoxide or carbon dioxide). The chain shuttling is counter-balanced by an equal but opposite change in coordination site for the acetate co-ligand. It was shown that, by changing the co-ligand, it was possible to alter the rate of polymerization and DFT could be used to predict activity [123]. The chain shuttling mechanism implies that there are distinct roles for the two metal centres, as sketched in figure 10. Thus, one of the metal centres (illustrated in blue) coordinates the epoxides, while the other centre (illustrated in red) inserts carbon dioxide. The requirements for these processes are distinct, with epoxide coordination being accelerated by Lewis acidic/electrophilic metal centres, while the carbonate formation and attack step is favoured by metals showing labile rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 1 0 1 initial rate = U = k[CHO] [CO ] [catalyst] 0 0 2 0 (a) (b) 5.1 OO M M a b CO RDS (fast) OO PO Zn Zn O –12.8 O O –17.8 O O OO OO M M M M a b a b Zn Zn OO O + CHO O O O O Zn Zn O O O O OP O O O O O reaction coordinate ‡ –1 DG = 25.7 ± 0.5 kcal mol ‡ –1 DG = 23.5 kcal mol ‡ –1 ‡ –1 353 DH = 22.5 ± 0.5 kcal mol ; DS =–9 ± 0.1 cal mol Figure 10. Comparison of the experimentally determined free energy barrier (a) to polymerization with the value determined by DFT (b)[123]. (Online version in colour.) TON –1 TOF / h X = OAc H H H H H H X O X O N O N N N N N Zn Mg Mg Zn Mg Zn NN O X NN O X NN O X H H H H H H 1 2 3 50:50 1:2 catalyst Figure 11. The structures of di-zinc (1), di-magnesium (2) and the heterodinuclear mixed catalyst system (3) which were compared for the ROCOP of CO /CHO [120]. (Online version in colour.) carbonate groups. Such a mechanism would be expected to be improved by having distinct metals serving the two roles and thus provided an impetus to study heterodinuclear catalysts. In 2014, our group reported the first example of such a system [120]. The catalyst is a mixture of compounds, including both homodinuclear complexes and the heterodinuclear complex. Figure 11 compares the activity and productivity of this catalyst mixture, the homodinuclear complexes alone and in a 50 : 50 combination. It is clear that the mixture containing the heterodinculear catalyst shows an activity that is greater than either of the homodinuclear complexes or combinations of them. This finding provides the first evidence, albeit of a mixture of components, that heterodinuclear complexes are worth investigation in this field of catalysis [120]. 5. Conclusion The ROCOP of carbon dioxide and epoxides provides a useful means to reduce pollution, to consume carbon dioxide and to produce aliphatic polycarbonates. Low-M , hydroxyl-end- capped, polycarbonate polyols are emerging as useful materials for the production of higher polymers, notably polyurethanes. There remain significant opportunities and challenges to understand and optimize the material properties of the polymers depending on the catalyst and raw materials available. turnover no. (TON) calculated free energy –1 (DDG )/kcal mol –1 TOF / h rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... Catalysis plays a key role in the success and scope of this reaction. The selection of the catalyst is central to being able to control features such as the rate, productivity, selectivity, regio-/stereo-chemistry, polymer molecular weight, polymer end-groups and polymer composition and to produce block copolymers. So far, several successful heterogeneous and homogeneous catalyst types have been studied. A common theme is that the pathways are often proposed to occur via dinuclear or bimetallic routes, whereby one metal activates the epoxide, while the other metal provides the nucleophile (carbonate) to attack and ring-open the epoxide. Thus, recently, a number of improvements to catalyst rate and selectivity have been achieved by targeting structures that optimize the coordination chemistry of dinuclear catalysts. The discovery and further development of dinuclear and bimetallic homo- and heterogeneous catalysts is an important area for future research. Authors’ contributions. All authors have contributed to the review article. Competing interests. C.K.W. is a director and CSO of Econic Technologies. Funding. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) are acknowledged for funding (EP/K035274/1; EP/K014070/1; EP/K014668; EP/L017393/1). References 1. Inoue S, Koinuma H, Tsuruta T. 1969 Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. J. Poly. Sci. B Polym. Lett. 7, 287–292. (doi:10.1002/pol.1969.110070408) 2. Childers MI, Longo JM, Van Zee NJ, LaPointe AM, Coates GW. 2014 Stereoselective epoxide polymerization and copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 114, 8129–8152. (doi:10.1021/cr400 725x) 3. Paul S, Zhu YQ, Romain C, Saini PK, Brooks R, Williams CK. 2015 Ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP): synthesis and properties of polyesters and polycarbonates. Chem. Commun. 51, 6459–6479. (doi:10.1039/C4CC10113H) 4. Luinstra GA. 2008 Poly(propylene carbonate), old copolymers of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide with new interests: catalysis and material properties. Polym. Rev. 48, 192–219. (doi:10.1080/15583720701834240) 5. Darensbourg DJ. 2007 Making plastics from carbon dioxide: salen metal complexes as catalysts for the production of polycarbonates from epoxides and CO . Chem. Rev. 107, 2388–2410. (doi:10.1021/cr068363q) 6. Markewitz P, Kuckshinrichs W, Leitner W, Linssen J, Zapp P, Bongartz R, Schreiber A, Müller TE. 2012 Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO . Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7281–7305. (doi:10.1039/c2ee03403d) 7. MacDowell N et al. 2010 An overview of CO capture technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1645–1669. (doi:10.1039/c004106h) 8. Darensbourg DJ, Yeung AD. 2014 A concise review of computational studies of the carbon dioxide–epoxide copolymerization reactions. Polym. Chem. 5, 3949–3962. (doi:10.1039/c4py 00299g) 9. Darensbourg DJ, Wilson SJ. 2012 What’s new with CO ? Recent advances in its copolymeri- zation with oxiranes. Green Chem. 14, 2665–2671. (doi:10.1039/c2gc35928f) 10. Romain C, Thevenon A, Saini PK, Williams CK. 2015 Dinuclear metal complex-mediated formation of CO -based polycarbonates. In Carbon dioxide and organometallics (ed. X-B Lu), Topics in Organometallic Chemistry, no. 53, pp. 101–141. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. (doi:10.1007/3418_2015_95) 11. Kember MR, Buchard A, Williams CK. 2011 Catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerisation. Chem. Commun. 47, 141–163. (doi:10.1039/C0CC02207A) 12. Nozaki K. 2004 Asymmetric catalytic synthesis of polyketones and polycarbonates. J. Macromol. Sci. Pure Appl. Chem. 76, 541–546. (doi:10.1351/pac200476030541) 13. Lu X-B, Ren W-M, Wu G-P. 2012 CO copolymers from epoxides: catalyst activity, product selectivity, and stereochemistry control. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1721–1735. (doi:10.1021/ ar300035z) 14. Klaus S, Lehenmeier MW, Anderson CE, Rieger B. 2011 Recent advances in CO /epoxide copolymerization—new strategies and cooperative mechanisms. Coord. Chem. Rev. 255, 1460–1479. (doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.002) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 15. Coates GW, Moore DR. 2004 Discrete metal-based catalysts for the copolymerization of CO and epoxides: discovery, reactivity, optimization, and mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6618–6639. (doi:10.1002/anie.200460442) 16. Langanke J, Wolf A, Hofmann J, Bohm K, Subhani MA, Muller TE, Leitner W, Gürtler C. 2014 Carbon dioxide (CO ) as sustainable feedstock for polyurethane production. Green Chem. 16, 1865–1870. (doi:10.1039/C3GC41788C) 17. Lee SH, Cyriac A, Jeon JY, Lee BY. 2012 Preparation of thermoplastic polyurethanes using in situ generated poly(propylene carbonate)-diols. Polym. Chem. 3, 1215–1220. (doi:10.1039/ c2py00010e) 18. von der Assen N, Bardow A. 2014 Life cycle assessment of polyols for polyurethane production using CO as feedstock: insights from an industrial case study. Green Chem. 16, 3272–3280. (doi:10.1039/c4gc00513a) 19. Korashvili R, Noernberg B, Bornholdt N, Borchardt E, Luinstra GA. 2013 Poly(propylene carbonate) from carbon dioxide: challenges for large-scale application. Chem. Ing. Tech. 85, 437–446. (doi:10.1002/cite.201200215) 20. Chapman AC, Keyworth C, Kember MR, Lennox AJJ, Williams CK. 2015 Adding value to power station captured CO : tolerant Zn and Mg homogeneous catalysts for polycarbonate polyol production. ACS Catal. 5, 1581–1588. (doi:10.1021/cs501798s) 21. Darensbourg DJ, Wei S-H. 2012 Depolymerization of polycarbonates derived from carbon dioxide and epoxides to provide cyclic carbonates. A kinetic study. Macromolecules 45, 5916–5922. (doi:10.1021/ma301110c) 22. Darensbourg DJ, Moncada AI, Wei S-H. 2011 Aliphatic polycarbonates produced from the coupling of carbon dioxide and oxetanes and their depolymerization via cyclic carbonate formation. Macromolecules 44, 2568–2576. (doi:10.1021/ma2002323) 23. Wu G-P, Wei S-H, Ren W-M, Lu X-B, Li B, Zu Y-P, Darensbourg DJ. 2011 Alternating copolymerization of CO and styrene oxide with Co(III)-based catalyst systems: differences between styrene oxide and propylene oxide. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 5084–5092. (doi:10.1039/c1ee02566j) 24. Cyriac A, Lee SH, Varghese JK, Park ES, Park JH, Lee BY. 2010 Immortal CO /propylene oxide copolymerization: precise control of molecular weight and architecture of various block copolymers. Macromolecules 43, 7398–7401. (doi:10.1021/ma101259k) 25. Inoue S. 2000 Immortal polymerization: the outset, development, and application. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 38, 2861–2871. (doi:10.1002/1099-0518(20000815)38:16<2861::AID-POLA 20>3.0.CO;2-1) 26. Kember MR, Copley J, Buchard A, Williams CK. 2012 Triblock copolymers from lactide and telechelic poly(cyclohexene carbonate). Polym. Chem. 3, 1196–1201. (doi:10.1039/ c2py00543c) 27. Yi N, Unruangsri J, Shaw J, Williams CK. 2015 Carbon dioxide capture and utilization: using dinuclear catalysts to prepare polycarbonates. Faraday Discuss. 183, 67–82. (doi:10.1039/c5fd00073d) 28. Nakano K, Nakamura M, Nozaki K. 2009 Alternating copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide with carbon dioxide catalyzed by (salalen)CrCl complexes. Macromolecules 42, 6972–6980. (doi:10.1021/ma9012626) 29. Na SJ, Sujith S, Cyriac A, Kim BE, Yoo J, Kang YK, Han SJ, Lee C, Lee BY. 2009 Elucidation of the structure of a highly active catalytic system for CO /epoxide copolymerization: a salen–cobaltate complex of an unusual binding mode. Inorg. Chem. 48, 10 455–10 465. (doi:10.1021/ic901584u) 30. Noh EK, Na SJ, Sujith S, Kim SW, Lee BY. 2007 Two components in a molecule: highly efficient and thermally robust catalytic system for CO /epoxide copolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 8082–8083. (doi:10.1021/ja071290n) 31. Cohen CT, Chu T, Coates GW. 2005 Cobalt catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide: combining high activity and selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10 869–10 878. (doi:10.1021/ja051744l) 32. Chatterjee C, Chisholm MH. 2011 The influence of the metal (Al, Cr, and Co) and the substituents of the porphyrin in controlling the reactions involved in the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by porphyrin metal(III) complexes. 1. Aluminum chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 50, 4481–4492. (doi:10.1021/ic200142f) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 33. Sujith S, Min JK, Seong JE, Na SJ, Lee BY. 2008 A highly active and recyclable catalytic system for CO propylene oxide copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 7306–7309. (doi:10.1002/anie.200801852) 34. Nakano K, Fujie R, Shintani R, Nozaki K. 2013 Efficient catalyst removal and recycling in copolymerization of epoxides with carbon dioxide via simple liquid–liquid phase separation. Chem. Commun. 49, 9332–9334. (doi:10.1039/c3cc45622f) 35. Yu K, Jones CW. 2003 Silica-immobilized zinc β-diiminate catalysts for the copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Organometallics 22, 2571–2580. (doi:10.1021/om030209w) 36. Ree M, Hwang Y, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim G. 2006 New findings in the catalytic activity of zinc glutarate and its application in the chemical fixation of CO into polycarbonates and their derivatives. Catal. Today 115, 134–145. (doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2006.02.068) 37. Hwang Y, Kim H, Ree M. 2005 Zinc glutarate catalyzed synthesis and biodegradability of poly(carbonate-co-ester)s from CO , propylene oxide, and ε-caprolactone. Macromol. Symp. 224, 227–237. (doi:10.1002/masy.200550620) 38. Kim JS, Kim H, Ree M. 2004 Hydrothermal synthesis of single-crystalline zinc glutarate and its structural determination. Chem. Mater. 16, 2981–2983. (doi:10.1021/cm035358j) 39. Kim JS et al. 2003 X-ray absorption and NMR spectroscopic investigations of zinc glutarates prepared from various zinc sources and their catalytic activities in the copolymeri- zation of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Catal. 218, 209–219. (doi:10.1016/ S0021-9517(03)00082-4) 40. Kim JS et al. 2003 NEXAFS spectroscopy study of the surface properties of zinc glutarate and its reactivity with carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Catal. 218, 386–395. (doi:10.1016/ S0021-9517(03)00122-2) 41. Ree M, Bae JY, Jung JH, Shin TJ. 1999 A new copolymerization process leading to poly(propylene carbonate) with a highly enhanced yield from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 37, 1863–1876. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990615)37: 12<1863::AID-POLA16>3.0.CO;2-K) 42. Eberhardt R, Allmendinger M, Zintl M, Troll C, Luinstra GA, Rieger B. 2004 New zinc dicarboxylate catalysts for the CO /propylene oxide copolymerization reaction: activity enhancement through Zn(II)-ethylsulfinate initiating groups. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 42–47. (doi:10.1002/macp.200350081) 43. Wu X, Zhao H, Nörnberg B, Theato P, Luinstra GA. 2014 Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyl-functionalized poly(propylene carbonate). Macromolecules 47, 492–497. (doi:10.1021/ma401899h) 44. Klaus S, Lehenmeier MW, Herdtweck E, Deglmann P, Ott AK, Rieger B. 2011 Mechanistic insights into heterogeneous zinc dicarboxylates and theoretical considerations for CO – epoxide copolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13 151–13 161. (doi:10.1021/ja204481w) 45. Varghese JK, Park DS, Jeon JY, Lee BY. 2013 Double metal cyanide catalyst prepared Co(CN) for high carbonate fraction and molecular weight control in carbon using H 3 6 dioxide/propylene oxide copolymerization. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 51, 4811–4818. (doi:10.1002/pola.26905) 46. Sebastian J, Srinivas D. 2013 Influence of method of preparation of solid, double-metal cyanide complexes on their catalytic activity for synthesis of hyperbranched polymers. Appl. Catal. A 464, 51–60. (doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.024) 47. Zhang X-H, Wei R-J, Sun X-K, Zhang J-F, Du B-Y, Fan Z-Q, Qi G-R. 2011 Selective copolymerization of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide catalyzed by a nanolamellar double metal cyanide complex catalyst at low polymerization temperatures. Polym. J. 52, 5494–5502. (doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2011.09.040) 48. Sun XK, Zhang XH, Liu F, Chen S, Du BY, Wang Q, Fan Z-Q, Qi G-R. 2008 Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene oxide catalyzed by silicon dioxide/ III Zn–Co double metal cyanide complex hybrid catalysts with a nanolamellar structure. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 46, 3128–3139. (doi:10.1002/pola.22666) 49. Robertson NJ, Qin ZQ, Dallinger GC, Lobkovsky EB, Lee S, Coates GW. 2006 Two-dimensional double metal cyanide complexes: highly active catalysts for the homopolymerization of propylene oxide and copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide. Dalton Trans. 2006, 5390–5395. (doi:10.1039/b607963f) 50. Kim I, Yi MJ, Lee KJ, Park D-W, Kim BU, Ha C-S. 2006 Aliphatic polycarbonate synthesis by copolymerization of carbon dioxide with epoxides over double metal cyanide catalysts rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... prepared by using ZnX (X = F, Cl, Br, I). Catal. Today 111, 292–296. (doi:10.1016/j.cattod. 2005.10.039) 51. Chen S, Qi G-R, Hua Z-J, Yan H-Q. 2004 Double metal cyanide complex based on Zn [Co(CN) ] as highly active catalyst for copolymerization of carbon dioxide and 3 6 2 cyclohexene oxide. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 42, 5284–5291. (doi:10.1002/pola.20334) 52. Kruper Jr WJ, Swart DJ. 1983 Dow Chemical Company. Carbon dioxide oxirane copolymers prepared using double metal cyanide complexes. Patent US 4,500,704, 15 August 1983. 53. Sugimoto H, Ohshima H, Inoue S. 2003 Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide by manganese porphyrin: the first example of polycarbonate synthesis from 1-atm carbon dioxide. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 41, 3549–3555. (doi:10.1002/pola.10835) 54. Darensbourg DJ, Wildeson JR, Yarbrough JC, Reibenspies JH. 2000 Bis 2,6-difluorophenoxide dimeric complexes of zinc and cadmium and their phosphine adducts: lessons learned relative to carbon dioxide/cyclohexene oxide alternating copolymerization processes catalyzed by zinc phenoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 12 487–12 496. (doi:10.1021/ja002855h) 55. Qin Z, Thomas CM, Lee S, Coates GW. 2003 Cobalt-based complexes for the copolymeri- zation of propylene oxide and CO : active and selective catalysts for polycarbonate synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 5484–5487. (doi:10.1002/anie.200352605) 56. Moore DR, Cheng M, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2003 Mechanism of the alternating copolymerization of epoxides and CO using β-diiminate zinc catalysts: evidence for a bimetallic epoxide enchainment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11 911–11 924. (doi:10.1021/ ja030085e) 57. Darensbourg DJ, Yarbrough JC. 2002 Mechanistic aspects of the copolymerization reaction of carbon dioxide and epoxides, using a chiral salen chromium chloride catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 6335–6342. (doi:10.1021/ja012714v) 58. Xiao Y, Wang Z, Ding K. 2005 Copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide with CO by using intramolecular dinuclear zinc catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 3668–3678. (doi:10.1002/chem. 200401159) 59. Xiao Y, Wang Z, Ding K. 2006 Intramolecularly dinuclear magnesium complex catalyzed copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide with CO under ambient CO pressure: kinetics and 2 2 mechanism. Macromolecules 39, 128–137. (doi:10.1021/ma051859+) 60. Kember MR, Knight PD, Reung PTR, Williams CK. 2009 Highly active dizinc catalyst for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene oxide at one atmosphere pressure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 931–933. (doi:10.1002/anie.200803896) 61. Lu X-B, Darensbourg DJ. 2012 Cobalt catalysts for the coupling of CO and epoxides to provide polycarbonates and cyclic carbonates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1462–1484. (doi:10.1039/ C1CS15142H) 62. Darensbourg DJ. 2012 Salen metal complexes as catalysts for the synthesis of polycarbonates from cyclic ethers and carbon dioxide. In Synthetic biodegradable polymers (eds B Rieger, A Kunkel, GW Coates, R Reichardt, E Dinjus, TA Zevaco), Advances in Polymer Science, vol. 245, pp. 1–27. Berlin, Germany: Springer. (doi:10.1007/12_2011_135) 63. Chatterjee C, Chisholm MH. 2012 Influence of the metal (Al, Cr, and Co) and the substituents of the porphyrin in controlling the reactions involved in the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by porphyrin metal(III) complexes. 2. Chromium chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 51, 12 041–12 052. (doi:10.1021/ic302137w) 64. Chatterjee C, Chisholm MH, El-Khaldy A, McIntosh RD, Miller JT, Wu T. 2013 Influence of the metal (Al, Cr, and Co) and substituents of the porphyrin in controlling reactions involved in copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by porphyrin metal(III) complexes. 3. Cobalt chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 52, 4547–4553. (doi:10.1021/ic400068y) 65. Aida T, Inoue S. 1983 Activation of carbon dioxide with aluminum porphyrin and reaction with epoxide. Studies on (tetraphenylporphinato)aluminum alkoxide having a long oxyalkylene chain as the alkoxide group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 1304–1309. (doi:10.1021/ ja00343a038) 66. Klaus S, Vagin SI, Lehenmeier MW, Deglmann P, Brym AK, Rieger B. 2011 Kinetic and mechanistic investigation of mononuclear and flexibly linked dinuclear complexes for copolymerization of CO and epoxides. Macromolecules 44, 9508–9516. (doi:10.1021/ ma201387f) 67. Nakano K, Kamada T, Nozaki K. 2006 Selective formation of polycarbonate over cyclic carbonate: copolymerization of epoxides with carbon dioxide catalyzed by a cobalt(III) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... complex with a piperidinium end-capping arm. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 7274–7277. (doi:10. 1002/anie.200603132) 68. Takeda N, Inoue S. 1978 Polymerization of 1,2-epoxypropane: a copolymerization with carbon dioxide catalyzed by metalloporphyrins. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 179, 1377–1381. (doi:10.1002/macp.1978.021790529) 69. Xia W, Salmeia KA, Vagin SI, Rieger B. 2015 Concerning the deactivation of cobalt(III)-based porphyrin and salen catalysts in epoxide/ CO copolymerization. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 4384–4390. (doi:10.1002/chem.201406258) 70. Xia W, Vagin SI, Rieger B. 2014 Regarding initial ring opening of propylene oxide in its copolymerization with CO catalyzed by a cobalt(III) porphyrin complex. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 15 499–15 504. (doi:10.1002/chem.201404147) 71. Harrold ND, Li Y, Chisholm MH. 2013 Studies of ring-opening reactions of styrene oxide by chromium tetraphenylporphyrin initiators. Mechanistic and stereochemical considerations. Macromolecules 46, 692–698. (doi:10.1021/ma302492p) 72. Anderson CE, Vagin SI, Hammann M, Zimmermann L, Rieger B. 2013 Copolymerisation of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by dinuclear cobalt porphyrins. ChemCatChem 5, 3269–3280. (doi:10.1002/cctc.201300307) 73. Anderson CE, Vagin SI, Xia W, Jin H, Rieger B. 2012 Cobaltoporphyrin-catalyzed CO /epoxide copolymerization: selectivity control by molecular design. Macromolecules 45, 6840–6849. (doi:10.1021/ma301205g) 74. Sugimoto H, Kuroda K. 2008 The cobalt porphyrin–Lewis base system: a highly selective catalyst for alternating copolymerization of CO and epoxide under mild conditions. Macromolecules 41, 312–317. (doi:10.1021/ma702354s) 75. Mang S, Cooper AI, Colclough ME, Chauhan N, Holmes AB. 2000 Copolymerization of CO and 1,2-cyclohexene oxide using a CO -soluble chromium porphyrin catalyst. 2 2 Macromolecules 33, 303–308. (doi:10.1021/ma991162m) 76. Darensbourg DJ, Yeung AD. 2015 Kinetics of the (salen)Cr(III)- and (salen)Co(III)-catalyzed copolymerization of epoxides with CO , and of the accompanying degradation reactions. Polym. Chem. 6, 1103–1117. (doi:10.1039/C4PY01322K) 77. Darensbourg DJ, Wilson SJ. 2013 Synthesis of CO -derived poly(indene carbonate) from indene oxide utilizing bifunctional cobalt(III) catalysts. Macromolecules 46, 5929–5934. (doi:10.1021/ma4013779) 78. Darensbourg DJ, Chung W-C. 2013 Relative basicities of cyclic ethers and esters. Chemistry of importance to ring-opening co- and terpolymerization reactions. Polyhedron 58, 139–143. (doi:10.1016/j.poly.2012.08.076) 79. Darensbourg DJ, Moncada AI, Choi W, Reibenspies JH. 2008 Mechanistic studies of the copolymerization reaction of oxetane and carbon dioxide to provide aliphatic polycarbonates catalyzed by (salen)CrX complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6523–6533. (doi:10.1021/ ja800302c) 80. Auriemma F, De Rosa C, Di Caprio MR, Di Girolamo R, Ellis WC, Coates GW. 2015 Stereocomplexed poly(limonene carbonate): a unique example of the cocrystallization of amorphous enantiomeric polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1215–1218. (doi:10.1002/ anie.201410211) 81. Auriemma F, De Rosa C, Di Caprio MR, Di Girolamo R, Coates GW. 2015 Crystallization of alternating limonene oxide/carbon dioxide copolymers: determination of the crystal structure of stereocomplex poly(limonene carbonate). Macromolecules 48, 2534–2550. (doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00157) 82. Liu Y, Ren WM, Wang M, Liu C, Lu XB. 2015 Crystalline stereocomplexed polycarbonates: hydrogen-bond-driven interlocked orderly assembly of the opposite enantiomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2241–2244. (doi:10.1002/anie.201410692) 83. Liu Y, Ren WM, He KK, Lu XB. 2014 Crystalline-gradient polycarbonates prepared from enantioselective terpolymerization of meso-epoxides with CO . Nat. Commun. 5, 5687. (doi:10.1038/ncomms6687) 84. Wu G-P, Zu Y-P, Xu P-X, Ren W-M, Lu X-B. 2013 Microstructure analysis of a CO copolymer from styrene oxide at the diad level. Asian J. Chem. 8, 1854–1862. (doi:10.1002/asia.201300115) 85. Wu G-P, Xu P-X, Zu Y-P, Ren W-M, Lu X-B. 2013 Cobalt(III)-complex-mediated terpolymerization of CO , styrene oxide, and epoxides with an electron-donating group. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 51, 874–879. (doi:10.1002/pola.26444) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 86. Wu G-P, Xu P-X, Lu X-B, Zu Y-P, Wei S-H, Ren W-M, Darensbourg DJ. 2013 Crystalline CO copolymer from epichlorohydrin via Co(III)-complex-mediated stereospecific polymerization. Macromolecules 46, 2128–2133. (doi:10.1021/ma400252h) 87. Liu Y, Ren W-M, Liu J, Lu X-B. 2013 Asymmetric copolymerization of CO with meso- epoxides mediated by dinuclear cobalt(III) complexes: unprecedented enantioselectivity and activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11 594–11 598. (doi:10.1002/anie.201305154) 88. Niu Y, Li H. 2013 Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene III oxide catalyzed by salen Co (acetate) complexes. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 291, 2181–2189. (doi:10.1007/s00396-013-2957-2) 89. Ohkawara T, Suzuki K, Nakano K, Mori S, Nozaki K. 2014 Facile estimation of catalytic activity and selectivities in copolymerization of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide mediated by metal complexes with planar tetradentate ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10 728–10 735. (doi:10.1021/ja5046814) 90. Nakano K, Hashimoto S, Nakamura M, Kamada T, Nozaki K. 2011 Stereocomplex of poly(propylene carbonate): synthesis of stereogradient poly(propylene carbonate) by regio- and enantioselective copolymerization of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4868–4871. (doi:10.1002/anie.201007958) 91. Nakano K, Hashimoto S, Nozaki K. 2010 Bimetallic mechanism operating in the copolymerization of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide catalyzed by cobalt–salen complexes. Chem. Sci. 1, 369–373. (doi:10.1039/c0sc00220h) 92. Jeon JY, Lee JJ, Varghese JK, Na SJ, Sujith S, Go MJ, Lee J, Ok M-A, Lee BY. 2013 CO /ethylene oxide copolymerization and ligand variation for a highly active salen– cobalt(III) complex tethering 4 quaternary ammonium salts. Dalton Trans. 42, 9245–9254. (doi:10.1039/C2DT31854G) 93. Yoo J, Na SJ, Park HC, Cyriac A, Lee BY. 2010 Anion variation on a cobalt(III) complex of salen-type ligand tethered by four quaternary ammonium salts for CO /epoxide copolymerization. Dalton Trans. 39, 2622–2630. (doi:10.1039/b920992a) 94. Seong JE, Na SJ, Cyriac A, Kim B-W, Lee BY. 2010 Terpolymerizations of CO , propylene oxide, and various epoxides using a cobalt(III) complex of salen-type ligand tethered by four quaternary ammonium salts. Macromolecules 43, 903–908. (doi:10.1021/ ma902162n) 95. Kim BE, Varghese JK, Han YG, Lee BY. 2010 Cobalt(III) complexes of various salen-type ligand bearing four quaternary ammonium salts and their reactivity for CO /epoxide copolymerization. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 31, 829–834. (doi:10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.04.829) 96. Luinstra GA, Haas GR, Molnar F, Bernhart V, Eberhardt R, Rieger B. 2005 On the formation of aliphatic polycarbonates from epoxides with chromium(III) and aluminum(III) metal–salen complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 6298–6314. (doi:10.1002/chem.200500356) 97. Vagin SI, Reichardt R, Klaus S, Rieger B. 2010 Conformationally flexible dimeric salphen complexes for bifunctional catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14 367–14 369. (doi:10. 1021/ja106484t) 98. Eberhardt R, Allmendinger M, Rieger B. 2003 DMAP/Cr(III) catalyst ratio: the decisive factor for poly(propylene carbonate) formation in the coupling of CO and propylene oxide. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 24, 194–196. (doi:10.1002/marc.200390022) 99. Paddock RL, Nguyen ST. 2001 Chemical CO fixation: Cr(III) salen complexes as highly efficient catalysts for the coupling of CO and epoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 11 498–11 499. (doi:10.1021/ja0164677) 100. Darensbourg DJ, Bottarelli P, Andreatta JR. 2007 Inquiry into the formation of cyclic carbonates during the (salen)CrX catalyzed CO /cyclohexene oxide copolymerization process in the presence of ionic initiators. Macromolecules 40, 7727–7729. (doi:10.1021/ ma071206o) III 101. Darensbourg DJ, Mackiewicz RM, Rodgers JL, Phelps AL. 2004 (Salen)Cr X catalysts for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides: role of the initiator and cocatalyst. Inorg. Chem. 43, 1831–1833. (doi:10.1021/ic0352856) 102. Jacobsen EN. 2000 Asymmetric catalysis of epoxide ring-opening reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 421–431. (doi:10.1021/ar960061v) 103. Chen P, Chisholm MH, Gallucci JC, Zhang X, Zhou Z. 2005 Binding of propylene oxide to porphyrin- and salen-M(III) cations, where M = Al, Ga, Cr, and Co. Inorg. Chem. 44, 2588–2595. (doi:10.1021/ic048597x) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 104. Darensbourg DJ, Billodeaux DR, Perez LM. 2004 Cd NMR determination of the binding parameters of alicyclic epoxides to [hydrotris(3-phenylpyrazol-1-yl)borate]Cd(II) acetate. Organometallics 23, 5286–5290. (doi:10.1021/om049761r) 105. Aida T, Inoue S. 1996 Metalloporphyrins as initiators for living and immortal polymerizations. Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 39–48. (doi:10.1021/ar950029l) 106. Ren W-M, Zhang X, Liu Y, Li J-F, Wang H, Lu X-B. 2010 Highly active, bifunctional Co(III)-salen catalyst for alternating copolymerization of CO with cyclohexene oxide and terpolymerization with aliphatic epoxides. Macromolecules 43, 1396–1402. (doi:10.1021/ ma902321g) 107. Cheng M, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 1998 Catalytic reactions involving C feedstocks: new high-activity Zn(II)-based catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11 018–11 019. (doi:10.1021/ja982601k) 108. Lee BY, Kwon HY, Lee SY, Na SJ, Han S-I, Yun H, Lee H, Park Y-W. 2005 Bimetallic anilido- aldimine zinc complexes for epoxide/CO copolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3031– 3037. (doi:10.1021/ja0435135) 109. Kissling S, Lehenmeier MW, Altenbuchner PT, Kronast A, Reiter M, Deglmann P, Seemann UB, Rieger B. 2015 Dinuclear zinc catalysts with unprecedented activities for the copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide and CO . Chem. Commun. 51, 4579–4582. (doi:10.1039/C5CC00784D) 110. Kember MR, White AJP, Williams CK. 2010 Highly active di- and trimetallic cobalt catalysts for the copolymerization of CHO and CO at atmospheric pressure. Macromolecules 43, 2291– 2298. (doi:10.1021/ma902582m) 111. Ellis WC, Jung Y, Mulzer M, Di Girolamo R, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2014 Copolymerization of CO and meso epoxides using enantioselective β-diiminate catalysts: a route to highly isotactic polycarbonates. Chem. Sci. 5, 4004–4011. (doi:10.1039/ C4SC01686F) 112. Byrne CM, Allen SD, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2004 Alternating copolymerization of limonene oxide and carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11 404–11 405. (doi:10.1021/ ja0472580) 113. Allen SD, Moore DR, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2002 High-activity, single-site catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of CO and propylene oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14 284– 14 285. (doi:10.1021/ja028071g) 114. Jeske RC, Rowley JM, Coates GW. 2008 Pre-rate-determining selectivity in the terpolymerization of epoxides, cyclic anhydrides, and CO : a one-step route to diblock copolymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6041–6044. (doi:10.1002/anie.200801415) 115. Piesik DFJ, Range S, Harder S. 2008 Bimetallic calcium and zinc complexes with bridged β- diketiminate ligands: investigations on epoxide/ CO copolymerization. Organometallics 27, 6178–6187. (doi:10.1021/om800597f) 116. Kissling S, Altenbuchner PT, Lehenmeier MW, Herdtweck E, Deglmann P, Seemann UB, Rieger B. 2015 Mechanistic aspects of a highly active dinuclear zinc catalyst for the co-polymerization of epoxides and CO . Chem. Eur. J. 21, 8148–8157. (doi:10.1002/ chem.201406055) 117. Lehenmeier MW, Kissling S, Altenbuchner PT, Bruckmeier C, Deglmann P, Brym A-K, Rieger B. 2013 Flexibly tethered dinuclear zinc complexes: a solution to the entropy problem in CO /epoxide copolymerization catalysis? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 9821–9826. (doi:10.1002/anie.201302157) 118. Winkler M, Romain C, Meier MAR, Williams CK. 2015 Renewable polycarbonates and polyesters from 1,4-cyclohexadiene. Green Chem. 17, 300–306. (doi:10.1039/ C4GC01353K) 119. Saini PK, Romain C, Zhu Y, Williams CK. 2014 Di-magnesium and zinc catalysts for the copolymerization of phthalic anhydride and cyclohexene oxide. Polym. Chem. 5, 6068–6075. (doi:10.1039/C4PY00748D) 120. Saini PK, Romain C, Williams CK. 2014 Dinuclear metal catalysts: improved performance of heterodinuclear mixed catalysts for CO –epoxide copolymerization. Chem. Commun. 50, 4164–4167. (doi:10.1039/c3cc49158g) 121. Kember MR, Williams CK. 2012 Efficient magnesium catalysts for the copolymerization of epoxides and CO ; using water to synthesize polycarbonate polyols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15 676–15 679. (doi:10.1021/ja307096m) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 122. Kember MR, Jutz F, Buchard A, White AJP, Williams CK. 2012 Di-cobalt(II) catalysts for the copolymerisation of CO and cyclohexene oxide: support for a dinuclear mechanism? Chem. Sci. 3, 1245–1255. (doi:10.1039/c2sc00802e) 123. Buchard A, Jutz F, Kember MR, White AJP, Rzepa HS, Williams CK. 2012 Experimental and computational investigation of the mechanism of carbon dioxide/cyclohexene oxide copolymerization using a dizinc catalyst. Macromolecules 45, 6781–6795. (doi:10.1021/ ma300803b) 124. Jutz F, Buchard A, Kember MR, Fredrickson SB, Williams CK. 2011 Mechanistic investigation and reaction kinetics of the low-pressure copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide and carbon dioxide catalyzed by a dizinc complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17 395–17 405. (doi:10.1021/ ja206352x) 125. Buchard A, Kember MR, Sandeman KG, Williams CK. 2011 A bimetallic iron(III) catalyst for CO /epoxide coupling. Chem. Commun. 47, 212–214. (doi:10.1039/C0CC02205E) 126. Kember MR, White AJP, Williams CK. 2009 Di- and tri-zinc catalysts for the low-pressure copolymerization of CO and cyclohexene oxide. Inorg. Chem. 48, 9535–9542. (doi:10.1021/ ic901109e) 127. Zhu Y, Romain C, Poirier V, Williams CK. 2015 Influences of a dizinc catalyst and bifunctional chain transfer agents on the polymer architecture in the ring- opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone. Macromolecules 48, 2407–2416. (doi:10.1021/acs. macromol.5b00225) 128. Romain C, Williams CK. 2014 Chemoselective polymerization control: from mixed-monomer feedstock to copolymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1607–1610. (doi:10.1002/anie.201309575) 129. Zhu Y, Romain C, Williams CK. 2015 Selective polymerization catalysis: controlling the metal chain end group to prepare block copolyesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 12 179–12 182. (doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04541) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences Pubmed Central

Catalysts for CO2/epoxide ring-opening copolymerization

Trott, G.; Saini, P. K.; Williams, C. K.
Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences , Volume 374 (2061) – Feb 28, 2016
Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed-central/catalysts-for-co2-epoxide-ring-opening-copolymerization-gsLU0do77V

References (160)

Publisher
Pubmed Central
Copyright
© 2016 The Authors.
ISSN
1364-503X
eISSN
1471-2962
DOI
10.1098/rsta.2015.0085
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Catalysts for CO /epoxide ring-opening rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org copolymerization † † G. Trott ,P.K.Saini and C. K. Williams Review Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK Cite this article:TrottG,SainiPK,Williams CK. 2016 Catalysts for CO /epoxide This article summarizes and reviews recent progress ring-opening copolymerization. Phil.Trans.R. in the development of catalysts for the ring-opening Soc. A 374: 20150085. copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0085 The copolymerization is an interesting method to add value to carbon dioxide, including from waste sources, and to reduce pollution associated with commodity Accepted: 9 November 2015 polymer manufacture. The selection of the catalyst is of critical importance to control the composition, One contribution of 15 to a discussion meeting properties and applications of the resultant polymers. issue ‘Catalysis making the world a better This review highlights and exemplifies some key recent findings and hypotheses, in particular using place’. examples drawn from our own research. Subject Areas: inorganic chemistry 1. Introduction Keywords: The ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP) of carbon catalysis, polycarbonate, ring-opening dioxide and epoxides is an interesting method to copolymerization, CO synthesize a range of aliphatic polycarbonates (figure 1) [1–5]. The reaction was discovered more than 40 years Author for correspondence: ago and has since continued to attract attention as a means to reduce pollution associated with polymer C. K. Williams manufacture and to ‘add value’ to carbon dioxide [1]. e-mail: [email protected] It should be made clear that the use of CO in any chemical manufacturing process is unable to make a large impact on overall CO levels in the atmosphere. However, it remains important to pursue CO utilization as a means to reduce emissions, particularly those associated with existing, large-scale industrial processes and as an economic driver to support carbon capture [6,7]. The ROCOP process is strongly dependent on the selection of the catalyst, with various homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts having been reported [5,8–15]. The focus for this review article will be to highlight and exemplify some of the key findings in this area These authors contributed equally to this work. 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... common epoxides catalyst R R¢ R¢ CHO PO Figure 1. The ROCOP of carbon dioxide and epoxides to produce aliphatic polycarbonates. (Online version in colour.) of catalysis, in particular using examples drawn from our own research. The intention is not to provide a comprehensive review of all known catalysts; indeed, such reviews are already available [5,8–15]. The ROCOP reaction is a rare example of a truly catalytic process with the potential to deliver large-scale quantities of product, which genuinely consumes carbon dioxide. The most commonly studied epoxides are cyclohexene oxide (CHO) and propylene oxide (PO). Depending on the epoxide and the selectivity of the catalyst, up to 31% (polycyclohexene carbonate) or 43% (polypropylene carbonate) of the polymer mass derives from CO . The primary application for the polymer products is as low-molecular-weight (M ), (poly)hydroxyl-terminated ‘polyols’, which are widely used in the manufacture of polyurethanes [16]. Polyurethanes themselves are applied as flexible/rigid foams, adhesives, coatings and elastomers, as well as in many other areas. It has been shown that the properties of CO -derived polyols are suitable to replace polyether polyols in some applications [16,17]. Given that polyether polyols are prepared by epoxide homopolymerization, the ROCOP of CO and epoxides can also be viewed as a means to ‘replace’ a substantial portion of petrochemically derived resource (epoxide) with a renewable one (CO ). A recent detailed life-cycle analysis study compared these two types of polyols, showing significant reductions (approx. 20%) in both fossil resource depletion and greenhouse gas emissions for the CO -derived polymers [18]. Furthermore, the replacement of fossil-derived epoxides is economically attractive and is stimulating a number of commercialization studies [16,19](http://www.empowermaterials. com/; http://www.novomer.com/; http://www.covestro.com/en/Sustainability/Productions/ Polyols; http://www.econic-technologies.com/ [accessed 4 September 2015]). It has also recently been demonstrated that ROCOP catalysts are compatible with carbon capture and storage (CCS) processes [20]. Studies have shown that some homogeneous magnesium catalysts can be used in polymerizations where the carbon dioxide is captured at a CCS demonstrator plant attached to a UK power station. The catalysts showed near-equivalent performances using such captured gases compared to using ‘pure’ carbon dioxide. Furthermore, the catalyst showed a high tolerance to various impurities present in captured CO , including water, N , CO, thiols 2 2 and amines [20]. 2. Polymerization pathways and mechanisms A range of different catalysts are known but all catalysts contain metals, with Zn(II), Co(III) and Cr(III) being particularly common [5,8–14]. Prior to an examination of these catalysts, it is worth considering the series of reactions that are proposed to occur at the metal active site during polymerization, the major ones of which are illustrated in figure 2 [3,11]. The polymerization is initiated by coordination of an epoxide molecule and the subsequent ring opening by the nucleophilic attack of a carbonate group or ligand (X), so as to form a metal alkoxide intermediate. During chain propagation, carbon dioxide inserts into the metal alkoxide intermediate to form a metal carbonate species. The metal coordinates another molecule of epoxide, and nucleophilic attack by the carbonate group leads to the ring opening of the epoxide and formation of a new metal alkoxide species. Propagation therefore involves the ‘cycling’ between metal alkoxide and rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... initiation CO MX MM X O O O propagation O O O M R MM O O O R desired catalytic cycle O O O R OO formation of ether linkages metal carbonate metal alkoxide CO M R OO formation of cyclic by-product chain transfer R¢OH M P M R¢ H P O O O Figure 2. Catalytic cycle of CO /epoxide copolymerization. carbonate intermediates. The polymerization is terminated by exposure to conditions/reagents that lead to hydrolysis of the growing polymer chain and formation of a polymer chain end-capped with a hydroxyl group. There are also side reactions within this process, the proportions of which depend on the conditions, substrate and catalyst selected. The formation of ether linkages in the polymer chain can occur due to the occurrence of a metal alkoxide attack on an epoxide molecule instead of CO insertion. Such linkages change the polymer properties, which may be beneficial depending on the application, but nevertheless reduce the CO sequestered in the polymer backbone [16,17]. Five-membered ring cyclic carbonate by-products can also form; indeed, this is the thermodynamic product of the reaction between CO and epoxides and thus favoured under forcing conditions. The cyclic carbonates can form by depolymerization or ‘back-biting’ reactions; the extent of these depend on the catalyst and the ceiling temperature for the given polymer [21,22]. The cyclic carbonates can also form ‘off-metal’ and are particularly common, and sometimes problematic, contaminants when co-catalysts or ionic additives are applied [5,13]. For some types of catalyst, most commonly with metal salen catalysts, it is proposed that the addition of ionic co-catalysts leads to the polymer chains being in equilibrium between metal coordination and ‘free’ anionic polymer chains [5]. Such ‘off-metal’ chains have been shown to undergo cyclization to form cyclic carbonate by-products [23]. Chain transfer reactions also need to be considered. These reactions occur when the polymerizations are conducted under so-called ‘immortal’ conditions in the presence of protic compounds, such as alcohols, amines and water, among others [24–27]. When such protic reagents are present, the metal-alkoxide-terminated polymer chain is proposed to be in rapid exchange with the protic reagent, generating metal alkoxides and ‘free’ hydroxyl-terminated polymer chains. The chain transfer processes are proposed to occur more rapidly than propagation, leading to highly controlled polymerizations where the M of the polymer is determined by both the catalyst and chain transfer agent (protic reagent) concentrations. It is worth noting that in ROCOP the polycarbonate M is commonly experimentally observed to be rather lower than those expected for living polymerizations (where the M would depend only on the catalyst concentration) [25]. This is due to the presence or formation of chain transfer agents, such as diols, rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... Zn NC CN NC Co CN type I Zn NC CN O O 5 1 X=H O, Cl, Br, ROH Zn 2 Zn Zn 2 3 Figure 3. One of the crystal structures for zinc glutarate and a generic illustration of the structure of the repeat unit in zinc- cobaltdoublemetalcyanidecatalysts.Adaptedwithpermissionfrom[38].Copyright(2004)AmericanChemicalSociety.(Online version in colour.) in the epoxide monomers used [28–32]. In fact, the exploitation of catalysts able to operate under immortal polymerization conditions, i.e. where such chain transfer agents are added in larger excess compared to the catalyst, is essential to selectively prepare the polyols that are required in polyurethane manufacture [18,20,24]. The catalysts for ROCOP have some general features: the metals are Lewis acids; the metals’ redox reactivity should be limited; the metal alkoxide and carbonate intermediates are labile; and initiating ligands (X) include alkoxides, carboxylates, halides and other anionic groups [5,8–14]. It is common in this area of catalysis that dinuclear or bimetallic catalysts show good performances and bimetallic pathways are proposed to accelerate epoxide ring opening [10]. Finally, the polymerization catalysts should ideally be colourless, odourless, inexpensive and have low toxicity, as they may contaminate the polymer product. In this context, there have been a number of reports of strategies to remove and recycle homogeneous catalysts [33–35]. 3. Heterogeneous catalysts The two major classes of heterogeneous catalysts are zinc glutarate (or other carboxylates) and double metal cyanides [4,36–52]. Both are well known, and in some cases industrially applied, as epoxide homopolymerization catalysts [52]. For copolymerizations using carbon dioxide, these heterogeneous catalysts require much more forcing conditions than homogeneous species. In particular, high pressures of carbon dioxide are necessary, and perfectly alternating enchainment does not occur, but rather ether-enriched polycarbonates are produced. Zinc glutarate has been extensively studied, and two features stand out that increase activity: (i) the addition of ethylsulfinate groups and (ii) an increase in crystallinity of the catalyst [4,36–44]. The most commonly studied double metal cyanide catalyst is Zn (CoCN ) (figure 3), although 3 6 2 mixed Zn/Fe(III) species are also reported. These catalysts are typically applied as part of mixtures with so-called ‘complexation’ agents, including salts, alcohols and solvents [45–52]. They generally show very high activities but low CO uptakes; indeed, they commonly yield poly(ether carbonates) rather than perfectly alternating copolymers. Studying the mechanisms of such heterogeneous catalysts is very challenging; nevertheless, theoretical and experimental studies have led to the proposal that bimetallic polymerization processes are important. In particular, one study proposes that the active sites in zinc carboxylates should be separated by 4–5 Å [44]. 4. Homogeneous catalysts The common homogeneous catalysts can be classified into two broad types: rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... (a) (b) Ph 3 4 R R N N NN Ph Al X Ph M 2 2 R OO R N N X 1 1 R R Ph X = Cl, OMe, Me, OR M = metal; X = co-ligand (c)(d ) OAc – + +– X NBu Bu N X 3 3 NN N N Co Co O O OO N HN OAc X NBu Bu N X 3 3 – + + – Figure 4. Bicomponent catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerization. (a) General porphyrin structure [32,53,63–65]. (b) General salen structure [55,57,66]. (c) Bifunctional salcy complex tethered to piperidinium moieties [67]. (d) Bifunctional salen complex tethered to quaternary ammonium groups [33]. (a) Bicomponent catalyst systems comprising metal(III) complexes used with co-catalysts. The catalysts are usually complexes of Co(III), Cr(III), Mn(III) or Al(III) coordinated by ligands such as salens or porphyrins. The co-catalysts are typically ionic compounds, the most common of which is bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium (PPN) chloride (PPNCl), or Lewis bases, commonly 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). (b) Dinuclear or bimetallic catalysts comprising metal(II/III) complexes. Most commonly these are complexes where two metals are coordinated by tethered ‘mononucleating’ ligands, such as Zn(II) β-diiminates (BDIs) or tethered Co(II)/Cr(III) salens. There are also examples of deliberately dinucleating ligands, such as macrocyclic ligands coordinated to Zn(II), Mg(II), Co(II/III) or Fe(III). Most homogeneous catalysts operate under moderate/high pressures of CO , and usually require more than 10 bar pressure, but, in contrast to heterogeneous catalysts, they do yield highly alternating copolymers [15,53–57]. In a drive to change the polymerization process conditions, catalysts have now been developed that show high activities and perfectly alternating enchainment under low pressures of carbon dioxide, including at 1 bar pressure [58–60]. (a) Bicomponent catalysts These catalysts are used with an exogenous co-catalyst or, more recently, have the co-catalyst attached to the ancillary ligand scaffold [5,32,61–63]. The ligands are usually planar, tetradentate, dianionic compounds such as salens or porphyrins. The commonly used co-catalysts are ionic salts, such as PPNX and ammonium halides. The structures of typical catalysts in this class are illustrated in figure 4 [5,32,61–63]. rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... XX M M OO RR¢ R R¢ X = ligand, most often halide or carboxylate group Y = co-catalyst (e.g. NR X, PPNX, bulky nucleophile) M = metal and planar ancillary ligand fragment, where the ancillary ligand most often is a salen or porphyrin Figure 5. Possible pathways for epoxide ring opening by the bicomponent catalysts. The first well-defined homogeneous catalysts were metal(III) porphyrin complexes (e.g. figure 4a), which in combination with an ionic salt allowed the controlled ROCOP of CO /epoxide [68]. There have subsequently been several studies to elucidate the influences of various ligand substituents and metal centres, which revealed that Co(III) centres coordinated by porphyrin ligands, substituted with electron-withdrawing groups, showed the best performances [32,53,63,64,69–75]. However, in general, metal porphyrin catalysts have lower activities and productivities compared with metal salen catalysts. Catalysts based on salen ligands (figure 4b) are some of the most active catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerizations [5]. Darensbourg [5,22,62,76–79], Coates [15,31,55,80,81], Lu [82–87], Li [88], Nozaki [28,67,89–91], Lee [29,30,33,92–95], Rieger [66,69,96–98] and others have led the development of various [salenMX] complexes (where M = Cr(III), Co(III), Al(III)), many of which show very high rates and selectivities. Coates pioneered the application of chiral [Co(salen)] complexes as highly active CO /PO ROCOP catalysts. This class of chiral cobalt salen catalysts has been extensively investigated by a number of groups and they now show outstanding levels of regio- and stereochemical control [2,31,55]. Indeed, they have been applied in the preparation of entirely new classes of stereocomplex polycarbonates, starting from racemic mixtures of epoxides [80–82,90]. The nature of the co-catalyst is also important; as mentioned PPNX salts are widely applied. Furthermore, the amount of co-catalyst is generally optimum at 1 equivalent (versus metal complex), as greater quantities reduce activity. This is proposed to be due to competitive binding (versus epoxide) at the metal centre [99,100]. Using more than 1 equivalent of co-catalyst also increases the rate of back-biting side reactions to form cyclic carbonate products [5,57,100,101]. The co-catalyst serves a number of roles in the catalytic cycle. It is proposed that the co- catalyst binds to the metal complex in order to complete an octahedral coordination geometry and, by trans-coordination, enhances the labilization of the initiating or propagating group [5]. Additionally, the co-catalyst may act as an external nucleophile which initiates polymerization. The precise mechanisms by which such catalysts operate are rather complex and not yet fully defined, but it is generally proposed that the rate-limiting step involves epoxide ring opening rather than carbon dioxide insertion [5]. Recent kinetic studies have revealed that the polymerization rates, using metal salen catalysts, are typically dependent on catalyst concentration to a fractional order, usually between 1 and 2[89]. This is indicative of pathways involving two metal complexes and/or dimerization in the rate-limiting step. Figure 5 illustrates the two different proposed pathways for epoxide ring opening. The fractional orders in catalyst concentration could be rationalized if both pathways are feasible and occurring concurrently. Significant work has also been carried out to investigate rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... the coordination of epoxides to such catalysts [102–104]. The gas-phase binding of epoxides in Al(III) and Cr(III) salen and porphyrin complexes was studied by Chisholm and co-workers and found to follow metal Lewis acidity trends [103]. Darensbourg also showed that the ring opening of epoxides by a nucleophile was dependent on the metal–epoxide bond length and the binding enthalpies, not solely on the rate at which epoxide binding occurred [104]. It is worth noting that the coordination of co-catalysts changes the Lewis acidity of the metal centre and so would affect epoxide binding [105]. Recently, Nozaki and co-workers [89] demonstrated a theoretical model to predict the catalytic activity and selectivity in PO ROCOP using planar bicomponent catalysts. By comparing the difference between the dissociation energies for metal epoxide, carbonate and alkoxide intermediates, the preferred pathway at each stage of the catalytic cycle could be quickly estimated [89]. One challenge of exogenous co-catalysts is that, if the stoichiometry (versus catalyst) is not finely balanced, significant side reactions to produce cyclic carbonate can result. Furthermore, because the systems are bicomponent, low catalyst loadings are not generally feasible. Finally, the fractional orders in catalyst imply that dimerization may be necessary, thereby providing an entropic barrier to catalysis at low metal loading. Two strategies have been used to overcome these limitations: (i) the development of catalysts whereby the co-catalyst is attached to the ancillary ligand and (ii) the development of dinuclear salen catalysts. Increased activities, tolerance and selectivities were observed by covalently bonding the co- catalyst moiety to the catalyst ligand, removing the need to add an exogenous co-catalyst source. Nozaki first reported this phenomenon for a Co(III) salen complex, substituted with piperidinium ‘arms’ (figure 4c)[67]. This catalyst showed very high selectivity for carbonate formation (more −1 than 99%), a high turnover frequency (TOF) (250 h ) and operated at room temperature, under 14 bar pressure of CO [67]. Lee subsequently also developed various bifunctional catalysts (figure 4d) substituted with ionic groups, which have shown some of the highest activities −1 (TOF = 26 000 h ) ever reported and which are active under low catalyst loadings (1 : 25 000 catalyst : PO) [29,30,33]. Lu has also shown that a cobalt salen complex with a tethered quaternary −1 ammonium salt is highly efficient (TOF up to 5160 h ) for the terpolymerization of CHO with a range of aliphatic epoxides (such as PO) and CO [106]. (b) Dinuclear or bimetallic catalysts An important development for the field was the report from Coates, in 1998, of highly active zinc BDI catalysts [107]. These catalysts have shown good activity and selectivity for CO /CHO ROCOP, at 50 C and 7 bar pressure of CO . A wide range of [(BDI)ZnX] complexes have since been synthesized where ligand substituents exert a strong effect on activity (figure 6a) [107,111–114]. In a landmark paper investigating the mechanism, it was shown that the most active catalysts existed as ‘loosely associated’ dimers under the polymerization conditions [56]. Rate studies revealed that the order in zinc varied from 1.0 to 1.8, implicating dimeric active sites [56]. This study has inspired many others to develop dinuclear catalysts so as to increase activity and selectivity. Lee pioneered this with a series of bis(anilido-aldimine) Zn(II) complexes which −1 showed high activities (TOF = 2860 h ) in copolymerization, at 1 : 50 000 [Zn] : [epoxide] loadings (figure 6b)[108]. The activity is sensitive to the N-aryl ortho-substituents and the fluorination of the aromatic rings significantly increased the TOF values [108]. Many researchers have investigated methods to ‘tether ’ Zn(II) BDI catalysts [109,115–117]. The geometry, site and flexibility of the tether exert a significant influence over the activity, the best system for CO /CHO −1 ◦ being a dinuclear Zn(II) catalyst (figure 6c), which showed TOF values of 155 000 h , at 100 C and 30 bar [109,116,117]. Nozaki and Rieger have investigated the tethering together of two salen ligands (figure 6d)so as to target dinuclear catalysts [91,97]. When no co-catalyst was used, these catalysts operated via a bimetallic mechanism and showed improved performances (6–11 times better than the rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... (a)(b)(c) R¢¢ R¢¢ R¢¢ R¢ R R¢ NN R Zn NN O O OO N N N(TMS) MeS SMe Zn Zn Zn Zn O O (TMS) N N N 2 N N R O O R Zn F C CF 3 3 NN R¢ R¢ R¢¢ R¢¢ R¢¢ R = Me, R¢ = Pr, R¢¢ =F (d)(e) H H N O N NN N O O N Co Co MM OO X O OO O X N X N HH X = OC(O)C F 6 5 M=Mg, Zn, Co; X = OAc Figure 6. Dinuclear catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerization: (a)zincBDI complex[56]; (b) zinc bis(anilido-aldimine) catalysts [108]; (c) tethered zinc BDI complex (TMS = trimethylsilyl) [109]; (d) tethered cobalt salen complex [91]; (e) dinuclear macrocyclic catalyst [110]. monometallic counterparts). Additionally, these catalysts were able to operate at low catalyst loadings (up to 20 000, epoxide/catalyst), supporting the notion that two metal sites may be involved in the pathway [91,97]. Our research group has focused on dinuclear catalysts coordinated by macrocyclic diphenolate ancillary ligands for CO /CHO ROCOP [20,26,60,110,118–129]. The di-zinc catalyst (figure 6e) was the first catalyst to show promising activity under 1 bar pressure of CO [60]. Subsequently, we have explored a range of ligands, metals and co-ligands, including the first reports of active Fe(III) and Mg(II) catalysts for ROCOP [20,26,60,110,118–128]. Changing the metal centre significantly affects the polymerization rates, with the order of activity being Co(III) > Mg(II) > Fe(III) > Zn(II) using the same symmetrical ancillary ligand [20,26,60,110,118–128]. Kinetic studies of CO /epoxide ROCOP, using the di-zinc acetate complex, showed a first-order dependence on CHO and catalyst concentrations and zero-order dependence on CO (1–40 bar) [124]. Furthermore, the detailed analysis of the temperature dependence of the rate coefficients for both polymerization and cyclic carbonate formation enables a comparison of the relative barriers for polymerization (polycyclohexene carbonate, PCHC) versus cyclic carbonate formation (cyclohexene carbonate, CHC), the results of which are qualitatively illustrated in figure 7 [124]. It is apparent that the di-zinc catalyst shows a high selectivity for polymer formation due to the barrier to polymerization being approximately half the value for cyclic carbonate formation −1 −1 (E (PCHC) of 96.8 kJ mol and E (CHC) of 137.5 kJ mol ). a a The rate law shows a zero-order dependence of carbon dioxide pressure (1–40 bar), which suggests that, under these conditions, the ring opening of the epoxide is rate-determining. The first-order catalyst dependence also supports the proposal of dinuclear propagation pathways. Although the catalyst is dinuclear, it also has two acetate co-ligands and therefore could potentially initiate two polymer chains per catalyst [123]. The polymerization kinetics show rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... E (CHC) E (PCHC) H H N O N M M + CO N X N H H M = Mg, Zn, Co(II/III), Fe(III) X = OAc, carboxylate, alkoxide, halide reaction coordinate Figure 7. The different reaction energy barriers to the formation of PCHC versus cyclic carbonate. As part of the full −1 kinetic analysis of the polymerization, the relative barriers were determined to be E (PCHC) of 96.8 kJ mol and E (CHC) of a a −1 137.5 kJ mol . Adapted with permission from [124]. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society. N(4) N(8) Cl(1) Co(1) N(40) O(1) N(18) O(11) Co(2) N(42) N(14) Cl(2) Figure 8. The structure, as determined using X-ray crystallography, of the di-cobalt catalyst [LCo Cl (methyl imidazole)]. The 2 2 ‘bowl’ shape of the ligand is notable in the structure, as are the two faces. The convex face refers to the outside of the ‘bowl’ (i.e. where Cl and MeIm are coordinated) and the concave face refers to the inside of the ‘bowl’ (i.e. where the bridging Cl ligand is coordinated). Adapted from [122]. first-order dependences on both catalyst and epoxide concentrations, which implies that only one acetate co-ligand initiates polymerization, although more complex pathways cannot be ruled out on the basis of the rate law. This led to further investigations into the possible roles for the co-ligands. A series of di-cobalt halide catalysts were prepared, with various neutral co-ligands being coordinated to them, including pyridine, methyl imidazole and DMAP (figures 8 and 9)[122]. The complexes all showed closely related solid-state structures, with the ancillary ligand adopting energy rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... base activity –1 (B) (h ) H H N O N pyridine Co Co N X B N methyl imidazole 104 HH dimethylamino- pyridine (DMAP) Figure 9. The structures of the di-Co(II) complexes and the corresponding activities in the copolymerization of CO /CHO. Polymerization conditions: CHO : catalyst = 1000 : 1, 80 C, 1 bar CO [122]. a ‘bowl’ conformation, whereby the NH substituents occupy the same ‘face’ of the molecule. In the concave face of the molecule, a halide ligand bridges the two cobalt centres. On the opposite convex face, a halide and Lewis base donor molecule coordinate to the cobalt centres (figure 8). It was discovered that the complexes showed rates strongly dependent on the nature of the donor ligand, with DMAP complexes having low activities and those coordinated by the weaker pyridine donor being equivalently active to catalysts without any co-ligand coordination. The finding that coordination of a single DMAP molecule could significantly slow the catalysis supported the notion that polymerization dominates from the convex face of the molecule and that two metals are involved. A detailed spectroscopic and density functional theory (DFT) study also shed light on the polymerization pathways and key intermediates [123]. Using in situ attenuated total reflectance– infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy to characterize the reaction between di-zinc acetate complex and CHO showed that there were different environments for the acetate co-ligand. One of the acetate groups shows resonances consistent with attack at the CHO group, while the other has a resonance consistent with it maintaining a ‘bridging’ coordination mode between the two zinc centres. The DFT study, carried out in solution, using appropriate functionals to model the polar environment, and using the complete catalyst structure, also substantiated the proposal that, although both metals are involved in propagation, only one of the two co-ligands initiates and propagates polymerization. The remaining co-ligand remains coordinated to the metal centres and mediates the polymerization process. Indeed, it was revealed by DFT that the polymer chain ‘switches’ coordination site between the two metal centres with each monomer insertion (epoxide or carbon dioxide). The chain shuttling is counter-balanced by an equal but opposite change in coordination site for the acetate co-ligand. It was shown that, by changing the co-ligand, it was possible to alter the rate of polymerization and DFT could be used to predict activity [123]. The chain shuttling mechanism implies that there are distinct roles for the two metal centres, as sketched in figure 10. Thus, one of the metal centres (illustrated in blue) coordinates the epoxides, while the other centre (illustrated in red) inserts carbon dioxide. The requirements for these processes are distinct, with epoxide coordination being accelerated by Lewis acidic/electrophilic metal centres, while the carbonate formation and attack step is favoured by metals showing labile rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 1 0 1 initial rate = U = k[CHO] [CO ] [catalyst] 0 0 2 0 (a) (b) 5.1 OO M M a b CO RDS (fast) OO PO Zn Zn O –12.8 O O –17.8 O O OO OO M M M M a b a b Zn Zn OO O + CHO O O O O Zn Zn O O O O OP O O O O O reaction coordinate ‡ –1 DG = 25.7 ± 0.5 kcal mol ‡ –1 DG = 23.5 kcal mol ‡ –1 ‡ –1 353 DH = 22.5 ± 0.5 kcal mol ; DS =–9 ± 0.1 cal mol Figure 10. Comparison of the experimentally determined free energy barrier (a) to polymerization with the value determined by DFT (b)[123]. (Online version in colour.) TON –1 TOF / h X = OAc H H H H H H X O X O N O N N N N N Zn Mg Mg Zn Mg Zn NN O X NN O X NN O X H H H H H H 1 2 3 50:50 1:2 catalyst Figure 11. The structures of di-zinc (1), di-magnesium (2) and the heterodinuclear mixed catalyst system (3) which were compared for the ROCOP of CO /CHO [120]. (Online version in colour.) carbonate groups. Such a mechanism would be expected to be improved by having distinct metals serving the two roles and thus provided an impetus to study heterodinuclear catalysts. In 2014, our group reported the first example of such a system [120]. The catalyst is a mixture of compounds, including both homodinuclear complexes and the heterodinuclear complex. Figure 11 compares the activity and productivity of this catalyst mixture, the homodinuclear complexes alone and in a 50 : 50 combination. It is clear that the mixture containing the heterodinculear catalyst shows an activity that is greater than either of the homodinuclear complexes or combinations of them. This finding provides the first evidence, albeit of a mixture of components, that heterodinuclear complexes are worth investigation in this field of catalysis [120]. 5. Conclusion The ROCOP of carbon dioxide and epoxides provides a useful means to reduce pollution, to consume carbon dioxide and to produce aliphatic polycarbonates. Low-M , hydroxyl-end- capped, polycarbonate polyols are emerging as useful materials for the production of higher polymers, notably polyurethanes. There remain significant opportunities and challenges to understand and optimize the material properties of the polymers depending on the catalyst and raw materials available. turnover no. (TON) calculated free energy –1 (DDG )/kcal mol –1 TOF / h rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... Catalysis plays a key role in the success and scope of this reaction. The selection of the catalyst is central to being able to control features such as the rate, productivity, selectivity, regio-/stereo-chemistry, polymer molecular weight, polymer end-groups and polymer composition and to produce block copolymers. So far, several successful heterogeneous and homogeneous catalyst types have been studied. A common theme is that the pathways are often proposed to occur via dinuclear or bimetallic routes, whereby one metal activates the epoxide, while the other metal provides the nucleophile (carbonate) to attack and ring-open the epoxide. Thus, recently, a number of improvements to catalyst rate and selectivity have been achieved by targeting structures that optimize the coordination chemistry of dinuclear catalysts. The discovery and further development of dinuclear and bimetallic homo- and heterogeneous catalysts is an important area for future research. Authors’ contributions. All authors have contributed to the review article. Competing interests. C.K.W. is a director and CSO of Econic Technologies. Funding. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) are acknowledged for funding (EP/K035274/1; EP/K014070/1; EP/K014668; EP/L017393/1). References 1. Inoue S, Koinuma H, Tsuruta T. 1969 Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. J. Poly. Sci. B Polym. Lett. 7, 287–292. (doi:10.1002/pol.1969.110070408) 2. Childers MI, Longo JM, Van Zee NJ, LaPointe AM, Coates GW. 2014 Stereoselective epoxide polymerization and copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 114, 8129–8152. (doi:10.1021/cr400 725x) 3. Paul S, Zhu YQ, Romain C, Saini PK, Brooks R, Williams CK. 2015 Ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP): synthesis and properties of polyesters and polycarbonates. Chem. Commun. 51, 6459–6479. (doi:10.1039/C4CC10113H) 4. Luinstra GA. 2008 Poly(propylene carbonate), old copolymers of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide with new interests: catalysis and material properties. Polym. Rev. 48, 192–219. (doi:10.1080/15583720701834240) 5. Darensbourg DJ. 2007 Making plastics from carbon dioxide: salen metal complexes as catalysts for the production of polycarbonates from epoxides and CO . Chem. Rev. 107, 2388–2410. (doi:10.1021/cr068363q) 6. Markewitz P, Kuckshinrichs W, Leitner W, Linssen J, Zapp P, Bongartz R, Schreiber A, Müller TE. 2012 Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO . Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7281–7305. (doi:10.1039/c2ee03403d) 7. MacDowell N et al. 2010 An overview of CO capture technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1645–1669. (doi:10.1039/c004106h) 8. Darensbourg DJ, Yeung AD. 2014 A concise review of computational studies of the carbon dioxide–epoxide copolymerization reactions. Polym. Chem. 5, 3949–3962. (doi:10.1039/c4py 00299g) 9. Darensbourg DJ, Wilson SJ. 2012 What’s new with CO ? Recent advances in its copolymeri- zation with oxiranes. Green Chem. 14, 2665–2671. (doi:10.1039/c2gc35928f) 10. Romain C, Thevenon A, Saini PK, Williams CK. 2015 Dinuclear metal complex-mediated formation of CO -based polycarbonates. In Carbon dioxide and organometallics (ed. X-B Lu), Topics in Organometallic Chemistry, no. 53, pp. 101–141. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. (doi:10.1007/3418_2015_95) 11. Kember MR, Buchard A, Williams CK. 2011 Catalysts for CO /epoxide copolymerisation. Chem. Commun. 47, 141–163. (doi:10.1039/C0CC02207A) 12. Nozaki K. 2004 Asymmetric catalytic synthesis of polyketones and polycarbonates. J. Macromol. Sci. Pure Appl. Chem. 76, 541–546. (doi:10.1351/pac200476030541) 13. Lu X-B, Ren W-M, Wu G-P. 2012 CO copolymers from epoxides: catalyst activity, product selectivity, and stereochemistry control. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1721–1735. (doi:10.1021/ ar300035z) 14. Klaus S, Lehenmeier MW, Anderson CE, Rieger B. 2011 Recent advances in CO /epoxide copolymerization—new strategies and cooperative mechanisms. Coord. Chem. Rev. 255, 1460–1479. (doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.002) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 15. Coates GW, Moore DR. 2004 Discrete metal-based catalysts for the copolymerization of CO and epoxides: discovery, reactivity, optimization, and mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6618–6639. (doi:10.1002/anie.200460442) 16. Langanke J, Wolf A, Hofmann J, Bohm K, Subhani MA, Muller TE, Leitner W, Gürtler C. 2014 Carbon dioxide (CO ) as sustainable feedstock for polyurethane production. Green Chem. 16, 1865–1870. (doi:10.1039/C3GC41788C) 17. Lee SH, Cyriac A, Jeon JY, Lee BY. 2012 Preparation of thermoplastic polyurethanes using in situ generated poly(propylene carbonate)-diols. Polym. Chem. 3, 1215–1220. (doi:10.1039/ c2py00010e) 18. von der Assen N, Bardow A. 2014 Life cycle assessment of polyols for polyurethane production using CO as feedstock: insights from an industrial case study. Green Chem. 16, 3272–3280. (doi:10.1039/c4gc00513a) 19. Korashvili R, Noernberg B, Bornholdt N, Borchardt E, Luinstra GA. 2013 Poly(propylene carbonate) from carbon dioxide: challenges for large-scale application. Chem. Ing. Tech. 85, 437–446. (doi:10.1002/cite.201200215) 20. Chapman AC, Keyworth C, Kember MR, Lennox AJJ, Williams CK. 2015 Adding value to power station captured CO : tolerant Zn and Mg homogeneous catalysts for polycarbonate polyol production. ACS Catal. 5, 1581–1588. (doi:10.1021/cs501798s) 21. Darensbourg DJ, Wei S-H. 2012 Depolymerization of polycarbonates derived from carbon dioxide and epoxides to provide cyclic carbonates. A kinetic study. Macromolecules 45, 5916–5922. (doi:10.1021/ma301110c) 22. Darensbourg DJ, Moncada AI, Wei S-H. 2011 Aliphatic polycarbonates produced from the coupling of carbon dioxide and oxetanes and their depolymerization via cyclic carbonate formation. Macromolecules 44, 2568–2576. (doi:10.1021/ma2002323) 23. Wu G-P, Wei S-H, Ren W-M, Lu X-B, Li B, Zu Y-P, Darensbourg DJ. 2011 Alternating copolymerization of CO and styrene oxide with Co(III)-based catalyst systems: differences between styrene oxide and propylene oxide. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 5084–5092. (doi:10.1039/c1ee02566j) 24. Cyriac A, Lee SH, Varghese JK, Park ES, Park JH, Lee BY. 2010 Immortal CO /propylene oxide copolymerization: precise control of molecular weight and architecture of various block copolymers. Macromolecules 43, 7398–7401. (doi:10.1021/ma101259k) 25. Inoue S. 2000 Immortal polymerization: the outset, development, and application. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 38, 2861–2871. (doi:10.1002/1099-0518(20000815)38:16<2861::AID-POLA 20>3.0.CO;2-1) 26. Kember MR, Copley J, Buchard A, Williams CK. 2012 Triblock copolymers from lactide and telechelic poly(cyclohexene carbonate). Polym. Chem. 3, 1196–1201. (doi:10.1039/ c2py00543c) 27. Yi N, Unruangsri J, Shaw J, Williams CK. 2015 Carbon dioxide capture and utilization: using dinuclear catalysts to prepare polycarbonates. Faraday Discuss. 183, 67–82. (doi:10.1039/c5fd00073d) 28. Nakano K, Nakamura M, Nozaki K. 2009 Alternating copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide with carbon dioxide catalyzed by (salalen)CrCl complexes. Macromolecules 42, 6972–6980. (doi:10.1021/ma9012626) 29. Na SJ, Sujith S, Cyriac A, Kim BE, Yoo J, Kang YK, Han SJ, Lee C, Lee BY. 2009 Elucidation of the structure of a highly active catalytic system for CO /epoxide copolymerization: a salen–cobaltate complex of an unusual binding mode. Inorg. Chem. 48, 10 455–10 465. (doi:10.1021/ic901584u) 30. Noh EK, Na SJ, Sujith S, Kim SW, Lee BY. 2007 Two components in a molecule: highly efficient and thermally robust catalytic system for CO /epoxide copolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 8082–8083. (doi:10.1021/ja071290n) 31. Cohen CT, Chu T, Coates GW. 2005 Cobalt catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide: combining high activity and selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10 869–10 878. (doi:10.1021/ja051744l) 32. Chatterjee C, Chisholm MH. 2011 The influence of the metal (Al, Cr, and Co) and the substituents of the porphyrin in controlling the reactions involved in the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by porphyrin metal(III) complexes. 1. Aluminum chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 50, 4481–4492. (doi:10.1021/ic200142f) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 33. Sujith S, Min JK, Seong JE, Na SJ, Lee BY. 2008 A highly active and recyclable catalytic system for CO propylene oxide copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 7306–7309. (doi:10.1002/anie.200801852) 34. Nakano K, Fujie R, Shintani R, Nozaki K. 2013 Efficient catalyst removal and recycling in copolymerization of epoxides with carbon dioxide via simple liquid–liquid phase separation. Chem. Commun. 49, 9332–9334. (doi:10.1039/c3cc45622f) 35. Yu K, Jones CW. 2003 Silica-immobilized zinc β-diiminate catalysts for the copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Organometallics 22, 2571–2580. (doi:10.1021/om030209w) 36. Ree M, Hwang Y, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim G. 2006 New findings in the catalytic activity of zinc glutarate and its application in the chemical fixation of CO into polycarbonates and their derivatives. Catal. Today 115, 134–145. (doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2006.02.068) 37. Hwang Y, Kim H, Ree M. 2005 Zinc glutarate catalyzed synthesis and biodegradability of poly(carbonate-co-ester)s from CO , propylene oxide, and ε-caprolactone. Macromol. Symp. 224, 227–237. (doi:10.1002/masy.200550620) 38. Kim JS, Kim H, Ree M. 2004 Hydrothermal synthesis of single-crystalline zinc glutarate and its structural determination. Chem. Mater. 16, 2981–2983. (doi:10.1021/cm035358j) 39. Kim JS et al. 2003 X-ray absorption and NMR spectroscopic investigations of zinc glutarates prepared from various zinc sources and their catalytic activities in the copolymeri- zation of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Catal. 218, 209–219. (doi:10.1016/ S0021-9517(03)00082-4) 40. Kim JS et al. 2003 NEXAFS spectroscopy study of the surface properties of zinc glutarate and its reactivity with carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Catal. 218, 386–395. (doi:10.1016/ S0021-9517(03)00122-2) 41. Ree M, Bae JY, Jung JH, Shin TJ. 1999 A new copolymerization process leading to poly(propylene carbonate) with a highly enhanced yield from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 37, 1863–1876. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990615)37: 12<1863::AID-POLA16>3.0.CO;2-K) 42. Eberhardt R, Allmendinger M, Zintl M, Troll C, Luinstra GA, Rieger B. 2004 New zinc dicarboxylate catalysts for the CO /propylene oxide copolymerization reaction: activity enhancement through Zn(II)-ethylsulfinate initiating groups. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 42–47. (doi:10.1002/macp.200350081) 43. Wu X, Zhao H, Nörnberg B, Theato P, Luinstra GA. 2014 Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyl-functionalized poly(propylene carbonate). Macromolecules 47, 492–497. (doi:10.1021/ma401899h) 44. Klaus S, Lehenmeier MW, Herdtweck E, Deglmann P, Ott AK, Rieger B. 2011 Mechanistic insights into heterogeneous zinc dicarboxylates and theoretical considerations for CO – epoxide copolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13 151–13 161. (doi:10.1021/ja204481w) 45. Varghese JK, Park DS, Jeon JY, Lee BY. 2013 Double metal cyanide catalyst prepared Co(CN) for high carbonate fraction and molecular weight control in carbon using H 3 6 dioxide/propylene oxide copolymerization. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 51, 4811–4818. (doi:10.1002/pola.26905) 46. Sebastian J, Srinivas D. 2013 Influence of method of preparation of solid, double-metal cyanide complexes on their catalytic activity for synthesis of hyperbranched polymers. Appl. Catal. A 464, 51–60. (doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.024) 47. Zhang X-H, Wei R-J, Sun X-K, Zhang J-F, Du B-Y, Fan Z-Q, Qi G-R. 2011 Selective copolymerization of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide catalyzed by a nanolamellar double metal cyanide complex catalyst at low polymerization temperatures. Polym. J. 52, 5494–5502. (doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2011.09.040) 48. Sun XK, Zhang XH, Liu F, Chen S, Du BY, Wang Q, Fan Z-Q, Qi G-R. 2008 Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene oxide catalyzed by silicon dioxide/ III Zn–Co double metal cyanide complex hybrid catalysts with a nanolamellar structure. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 46, 3128–3139. (doi:10.1002/pola.22666) 49. Robertson NJ, Qin ZQ, Dallinger GC, Lobkovsky EB, Lee S, Coates GW. 2006 Two-dimensional double metal cyanide complexes: highly active catalysts for the homopolymerization of propylene oxide and copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide. Dalton Trans. 2006, 5390–5395. (doi:10.1039/b607963f) 50. Kim I, Yi MJ, Lee KJ, Park D-W, Kim BU, Ha C-S. 2006 Aliphatic polycarbonate synthesis by copolymerization of carbon dioxide with epoxides over double metal cyanide catalysts rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... prepared by using ZnX (X = F, Cl, Br, I). Catal. Today 111, 292–296. (doi:10.1016/j.cattod. 2005.10.039) 51. Chen S, Qi G-R, Hua Z-J, Yan H-Q. 2004 Double metal cyanide complex based on Zn [Co(CN) ] as highly active catalyst for copolymerization of carbon dioxide and 3 6 2 cyclohexene oxide. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 42, 5284–5291. (doi:10.1002/pola.20334) 52. Kruper Jr WJ, Swart DJ. 1983 Dow Chemical Company. Carbon dioxide oxirane copolymers prepared using double metal cyanide complexes. Patent US 4,500,704, 15 August 1983. 53. Sugimoto H, Ohshima H, Inoue S. 2003 Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide by manganese porphyrin: the first example of polycarbonate synthesis from 1-atm carbon dioxide. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 41, 3549–3555. (doi:10.1002/pola.10835) 54. Darensbourg DJ, Wildeson JR, Yarbrough JC, Reibenspies JH. 2000 Bis 2,6-difluorophenoxide dimeric complexes of zinc and cadmium and their phosphine adducts: lessons learned relative to carbon dioxide/cyclohexene oxide alternating copolymerization processes catalyzed by zinc phenoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 12 487–12 496. (doi:10.1021/ja002855h) 55. Qin Z, Thomas CM, Lee S, Coates GW. 2003 Cobalt-based complexes for the copolymeri- zation of propylene oxide and CO : active and selective catalysts for polycarbonate synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 5484–5487. (doi:10.1002/anie.200352605) 56. Moore DR, Cheng M, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2003 Mechanism of the alternating copolymerization of epoxides and CO using β-diiminate zinc catalysts: evidence for a bimetallic epoxide enchainment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11 911–11 924. (doi:10.1021/ ja030085e) 57. Darensbourg DJ, Yarbrough JC. 2002 Mechanistic aspects of the copolymerization reaction of carbon dioxide and epoxides, using a chiral salen chromium chloride catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 6335–6342. (doi:10.1021/ja012714v) 58. Xiao Y, Wang Z, Ding K. 2005 Copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide with CO by using intramolecular dinuclear zinc catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 3668–3678. (doi:10.1002/chem. 200401159) 59. Xiao Y, Wang Z, Ding K. 2006 Intramolecularly dinuclear magnesium complex catalyzed copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide with CO under ambient CO pressure: kinetics and 2 2 mechanism. Macromolecules 39, 128–137. (doi:10.1021/ma051859+) 60. Kember MR, Knight PD, Reung PTR, Williams CK. 2009 Highly active dizinc catalyst for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene oxide at one atmosphere pressure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 931–933. (doi:10.1002/anie.200803896) 61. Lu X-B, Darensbourg DJ. 2012 Cobalt catalysts for the coupling of CO and epoxides to provide polycarbonates and cyclic carbonates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1462–1484. (doi:10.1039/ C1CS15142H) 62. Darensbourg DJ. 2012 Salen metal complexes as catalysts for the synthesis of polycarbonates from cyclic ethers and carbon dioxide. In Synthetic biodegradable polymers (eds B Rieger, A Kunkel, GW Coates, R Reichardt, E Dinjus, TA Zevaco), Advances in Polymer Science, vol. 245, pp. 1–27. Berlin, Germany: Springer. (doi:10.1007/12_2011_135) 63. Chatterjee C, Chisholm MH. 2012 Influence of the metal (Al, Cr, and Co) and the substituents of the porphyrin in controlling the reactions involved in the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by porphyrin metal(III) complexes. 2. Chromium chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 51, 12 041–12 052. (doi:10.1021/ic302137w) 64. Chatterjee C, Chisholm MH, El-Khaldy A, McIntosh RD, Miller JT, Wu T. 2013 Influence of the metal (Al, Cr, and Co) and substituents of the porphyrin in controlling reactions involved in copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by porphyrin metal(III) complexes. 3. Cobalt chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 52, 4547–4553. (doi:10.1021/ic400068y) 65. Aida T, Inoue S. 1983 Activation of carbon dioxide with aluminum porphyrin and reaction with epoxide. Studies on (tetraphenylporphinato)aluminum alkoxide having a long oxyalkylene chain as the alkoxide group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 1304–1309. (doi:10.1021/ ja00343a038) 66. Klaus S, Vagin SI, Lehenmeier MW, Deglmann P, Brym AK, Rieger B. 2011 Kinetic and mechanistic investigation of mononuclear and flexibly linked dinuclear complexes for copolymerization of CO and epoxides. Macromolecules 44, 9508–9516. (doi:10.1021/ ma201387f) 67. Nakano K, Kamada T, Nozaki K. 2006 Selective formation of polycarbonate over cyclic carbonate: copolymerization of epoxides with carbon dioxide catalyzed by a cobalt(III) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... complex with a piperidinium end-capping arm. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 7274–7277. (doi:10. 1002/anie.200603132) 68. Takeda N, Inoue S. 1978 Polymerization of 1,2-epoxypropane: a copolymerization with carbon dioxide catalyzed by metalloporphyrins. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 179, 1377–1381. (doi:10.1002/macp.1978.021790529) 69. Xia W, Salmeia KA, Vagin SI, Rieger B. 2015 Concerning the deactivation of cobalt(III)-based porphyrin and salen catalysts in epoxide/ CO copolymerization. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 4384–4390. (doi:10.1002/chem.201406258) 70. Xia W, Vagin SI, Rieger B. 2014 Regarding initial ring opening of propylene oxide in its copolymerization with CO catalyzed by a cobalt(III) porphyrin complex. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 15 499–15 504. (doi:10.1002/chem.201404147) 71. Harrold ND, Li Y, Chisholm MH. 2013 Studies of ring-opening reactions of styrene oxide by chromium tetraphenylporphyrin initiators. Mechanistic and stereochemical considerations. Macromolecules 46, 692–698. (doi:10.1021/ma302492p) 72. Anderson CE, Vagin SI, Hammann M, Zimmermann L, Rieger B. 2013 Copolymerisation of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide by dinuclear cobalt porphyrins. ChemCatChem 5, 3269–3280. (doi:10.1002/cctc.201300307) 73. Anderson CE, Vagin SI, Xia W, Jin H, Rieger B. 2012 Cobaltoporphyrin-catalyzed CO /epoxide copolymerization: selectivity control by molecular design. Macromolecules 45, 6840–6849. (doi:10.1021/ma301205g) 74. Sugimoto H, Kuroda K. 2008 The cobalt porphyrin–Lewis base system: a highly selective catalyst for alternating copolymerization of CO and epoxide under mild conditions. Macromolecules 41, 312–317. (doi:10.1021/ma702354s) 75. Mang S, Cooper AI, Colclough ME, Chauhan N, Holmes AB. 2000 Copolymerization of CO and 1,2-cyclohexene oxide using a CO -soluble chromium porphyrin catalyst. 2 2 Macromolecules 33, 303–308. (doi:10.1021/ma991162m) 76. Darensbourg DJ, Yeung AD. 2015 Kinetics of the (salen)Cr(III)- and (salen)Co(III)-catalyzed copolymerization of epoxides with CO , and of the accompanying degradation reactions. Polym. Chem. 6, 1103–1117. (doi:10.1039/C4PY01322K) 77. Darensbourg DJ, Wilson SJ. 2013 Synthesis of CO -derived poly(indene carbonate) from indene oxide utilizing bifunctional cobalt(III) catalysts. Macromolecules 46, 5929–5934. (doi:10.1021/ma4013779) 78. Darensbourg DJ, Chung W-C. 2013 Relative basicities of cyclic ethers and esters. Chemistry of importance to ring-opening co- and terpolymerization reactions. Polyhedron 58, 139–143. (doi:10.1016/j.poly.2012.08.076) 79. Darensbourg DJ, Moncada AI, Choi W, Reibenspies JH. 2008 Mechanistic studies of the copolymerization reaction of oxetane and carbon dioxide to provide aliphatic polycarbonates catalyzed by (salen)CrX complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6523–6533. (doi:10.1021/ ja800302c) 80. Auriemma F, De Rosa C, Di Caprio MR, Di Girolamo R, Ellis WC, Coates GW. 2015 Stereocomplexed poly(limonene carbonate): a unique example of the cocrystallization of amorphous enantiomeric polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1215–1218. (doi:10.1002/ anie.201410211) 81. Auriemma F, De Rosa C, Di Caprio MR, Di Girolamo R, Coates GW. 2015 Crystallization of alternating limonene oxide/carbon dioxide copolymers: determination of the crystal structure of stereocomplex poly(limonene carbonate). Macromolecules 48, 2534–2550. (doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00157) 82. Liu Y, Ren WM, Wang M, Liu C, Lu XB. 2015 Crystalline stereocomplexed polycarbonates: hydrogen-bond-driven interlocked orderly assembly of the opposite enantiomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2241–2244. (doi:10.1002/anie.201410692) 83. Liu Y, Ren WM, He KK, Lu XB. 2014 Crystalline-gradient polycarbonates prepared from enantioselective terpolymerization of meso-epoxides with CO . Nat. Commun. 5, 5687. (doi:10.1038/ncomms6687) 84. Wu G-P, Zu Y-P, Xu P-X, Ren W-M, Lu X-B. 2013 Microstructure analysis of a CO copolymer from styrene oxide at the diad level. Asian J. Chem. 8, 1854–1862. (doi:10.1002/asia.201300115) 85. Wu G-P, Xu P-X, Zu Y-P, Ren W-M, Lu X-B. 2013 Cobalt(III)-complex-mediated terpolymerization of CO , styrene oxide, and epoxides with an electron-donating group. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 51, 874–879. (doi:10.1002/pola.26444) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 86. Wu G-P, Xu P-X, Lu X-B, Zu Y-P, Wei S-H, Ren W-M, Darensbourg DJ. 2013 Crystalline CO copolymer from epichlorohydrin via Co(III)-complex-mediated stereospecific polymerization. Macromolecules 46, 2128–2133. (doi:10.1021/ma400252h) 87. Liu Y, Ren W-M, Liu J, Lu X-B. 2013 Asymmetric copolymerization of CO with meso- epoxides mediated by dinuclear cobalt(III) complexes: unprecedented enantioselectivity and activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11 594–11 598. (doi:10.1002/anie.201305154) 88. Niu Y, Li H. 2013 Alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and cyclohexene III oxide catalyzed by salen Co (acetate) complexes. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 291, 2181–2189. (doi:10.1007/s00396-013-2957-2) 89. Ohkawara T, Suzuki K, Nakano K, Mori S, Nozaki K. 2014 Facile estimation of catalytic activity and selectivities in copolymerization of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide mediated by metal complexes with planar tetradentate ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10 728–10 735. (doi:10.1021/ja5046814) 90. Nakano K, Hashimoto S, Nakamura M, Kamada T, Nozaki K. 2011 Stereocomplex of poly(propylene carbonate): synthesis of stereogradient poly(propylene carbonate) by regio- and enantioselective copolymerization of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4868–4871. (doi:10.1002/anie.201007958) 91. Nakano K, Hashimoto S, Nozaki K. 2010 Bimetallic mechanism operating in the copolymerization of propylene oxide with carbon dioxide catalyzed by cobalt–salen complexes. Chem. Sci. 1, 369–373. (doi:10.1039/c0sc00220h) 92. Jeon JY, Lee JJ, Varghese JK, Na SJ, Sujith S, Go MJ, Lee J, Ok M-A, Lee BY. 2013 CO /ethylene oxide copolymerization and ligand variation for a highly active salen– cobalt(III) complex tethering 4 quaternary ammonium salts. Dalton Trans. 42, 9245–9254. (doi:10.1039/C2DT31854G) 93. Yoo J, Na SJ, Park HC, Cyriac A, Lee BY. 2010 Anion variation on a cobalt(III) complex of salen-type ligand tethered by four quaternary ammonium salts for CO /epoxide copolymerization. Dalton Trans. 39, 2622–2630. (doi:10.1039/b920992a) 94. Seong JE, Na SJ, Cyriac A, Kim B-W, Lee BY. 2010 Terpolymerizations of CO , propylene oxide, and various epoxides using a cobalt(III) complex of salen-type ligand tethered by four quaternary ammonium salts. Macromolecules 43, 903–908. (doi:10.1021/ ma902162n) 95. Kim BE, Varghese JK, Han YG, Lee BY. 2010 Cobalt(III) complexes of various salen-type ligand bearing four quaternary ammonium salts and their reactivity for CO /epoxide copolymerization. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 31, 829–834. (doi:10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.04.829) 96. Luinstra GA, Haas GR, Molnar F, Bernhart V, Eberhardt R, Rieger B. 2005 On the formation of aliphatic polycarbonates from epoxides with chromium(III) and aluminum(III) metal–salen complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 6298–6314. (doi:10.1002/chem.200500356) 97. Vagin SI, Reichardt R, Klaus S, Rieger B. 2010 Conformationally flexible dimeric salphen complexes for bifunctional catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14 367–14 369. (doi:10. 1021/ja106484t) 98. Eberhardt R, Allmendinger M, Rieger B. 2003 DMAP/Cr(III) catalyst ratio: the decisive factor for poly(propylene carbonate) formation in the coupling of CO and propylene oxide. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 24, 194–196. (doi:10.1002/marc.200390022) 99. Paddock RL, Nguyen ST. 2001 Chemical CO fixation: Cr(III) salen complexes as highly efficient catalysts for the coupling of CO and epoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 11 498–11 499. (doi:10.1021/ja0164677) 100. Darensbourg DJ, Bottarelli P, Andreatta JR. 2007 Inquiry into the formation of cyclic carbonates during the (salen)CrX catalyzed CO /cyclohexene oxide copolymerization process in the presence of ionic initiators. Macromolecules 40, 7727–7729. (doi:10.1021/ ma071206o) III 101. Darensbourg DJ, Mackiewicz RM, Rodgers JL, Phelps AL. 2004 (Salen)Cr X catalysts for the copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides: role of the initiator and cocatalyst. Inorg. Chem. 43, 1831–1833. (doi:10.1021/ic0352856) 102. Jacobsen EN. 2000 Asymmetric catalysis of epoxide ring-opening reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 421–431. (doi:10.1021/ar960061v) 103. Chen P, Chisholm MH, Gallucci JC, Zhang X, Zhou Z. 2005 Binding of propylene oxide to porphyrin- and salen-M(III) cations, where M = Al, Ga, Cr, and Co. Inorg. Chem. 44, 2588–2595. (doi:10.1021/ic048597x) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 104. Darensbourg DJ, Billodeaux DR, Perez LM. 2004 Cd NMR determination of the binding parameters of alicyclic epoxides to [hydrotris(3-phenylpyrazol-1-yl)borate]Cd(II) acetate. Organometallics 23, 5286–5290. (doi:10.1021/om049761r) 105. Aida T, Inoue S. 1996 Metalloporphyrins as initiators for living and immortal polymerizations. Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 39–48. (doi:10.1021/ar950029l) 106. Ren W-M, Zhang X, Liu Y, Li J-F, Wang H, Lu X-B. 2010 Highly active, bifunctional Co(III)-salen catalyst for alternating copolymerization of CO with cyclohexene oxide and terpolymerization with aliphatic epoxides. Macromolecules 43, 1396–1402. (doi:10.1021/ ma902321g) 107. Cheng M, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 1998 Catalytic reactions involving C feedstocks: new high-activity Zn(II)-based catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11 018–11 019. (doi:10.1021/ja982601k) 108. Lee BY, Kwon HY, Lee SY, Na SJ, Han S-I, Yun H, Lee H, Park Y-W. 2005 Bimetallic anilido- aldimine zinc complexes for epoxide/CO copolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3031– 3037. (doi:10.1021/ja0435135) 109. Kissling S, Lehenmeier MW, Altenbuchner PT, Kronast A, Reiter M, Deglmann P, Seemann UB, Rieger B. 2015 Dinuclear zinc catalysts with unprecedented activities for the copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide and CO . Chem. Commun. 51, 4579–4582. (doi:10.1039/C5CC00784D) 110. Kember MR, White AJP, Williams CK. 2010 Highly active di- and trimetallic cobalt catalysts for the copolymerization of CHO and CO at atmospheric pressure. Macromolecules 43, 2291– 2298. (doi:10.1021/ma902582m) 111. Ellis WC, Jung Y, Mulzer M, Di Girolamo R, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2014 Copolymerization of CO and meso epoxides using enantioselective β-diiminate catalysts: a route to highly isotactic polycarbonates. Chem. Sci. 5, 4004–4011. (doi:10.1039/ C4SC01686F) 112. Byrne CM, Allen SD, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2004 Alternating copolymerization of limonene oxide and carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11 404–11 405. (doi:10.1021/ ja0472580) 113. Allen SD, Moore DR, Lobkovsky EB, Coates GW. 2002 High-activity, single-site catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of CO and propylene oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14 284– 14 285. (doi:10.1021/ja028071g) 114. Jeske RC, Rowley JM, Coates GW. 2008 Pre-rate-determining selectivity in the terpolymerization of epoxides, cyclic anhydrides, and CO : a one-step route to diblock copolymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6041–6044. (doi:10.1002/anie.200801415) 115. Piesik DFJ, Range S, Harder S. 2008 Bimetallic calcium and zinc complexes with bridged β- diketiminate ligands: investigations on epoxide/ CO copolymerization. Organometallics 27, 6178–6187. (doi:10.1021/om800597f) 116. Kissling S, Altenbuchner PT, Lehenmeier MW, Herdtweck E, Deglmann P, Seemann UB, Rieger B. 2015 Mechanistic aspects of a highly active dinuclear zinc catalyst for the co-polymerization of epoxides and CO . Chem. Eur. J. 21, 8148–8157. (doi:10.1002/ chem.201406055) 117. Lehenmeier MW, Kissling S, Altenbuchner PT, Bruckmeier C, Deglmann P, Brym A-K, Rieger B. 2013 Flexibly tethered dinuclear zinc complexes: a solution to the entropy problem in CO /epoxide copolymerization catalysis? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 9821–9826. (doi:10.1002/anie.201302157) 118. Winkler M, Romain C, Meier MAR, Williams CK. 2015 Renewable polycarbonates and polyesters from 1,4-cyclohexadiene. Green Chem. 17, 300–306. (doi:10.1039/ C4GC01353K) 119. Saini PK, Romain C, Zhu Y, Williams CK. 2014 Di-magnesium and zinc catalysts for the copolymerization of phthalic anhydride and cyclohexene oxide. Polym. Chem. 5, 6068–6075. (doi:10.1039/C4PY00748D) 120. Saini PK, Romain C, Williams CK. 2014 Dinuclear metal catalysts: improved performance of heterodinuclear mixed catalysts for CO –epoxide copolymerization. Chem. Commun. 50, 4164–4167. (doi:10.1039/c3cc49158g) 121. Kember MR, Williams CK. 2012 Efficient magnesium catalysts for the copolymerization of epoxides and CO ; using water to synthesize polycarbonate polyols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15 676–15 679. (doi:10.1021/ja307096m) rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R. Soc.A 374: 20150085 ......................................................... 122. Kember MR, Jutz F, Buchard A, White AJP, Williams CK. 2012 Di-cobalt(II) catalysts for the copolymerisation of CO and cyclohexene oxide: support for a dinuclear mechanism? Chem. Sci. 3, 1245–1255. (doi:10.1039/c2sc00802e) 123. Buchard A, Jutz F, Kember MR, White AJP, Rzepa HS, Williams CK. 2012 Experimental and computational investigation of the mechanism of carbon dioxide/cyclohexene oxide copolymerization using a dizinc catalyst. Macromolecules 45, 6781–6795. (doi:10.1021/ ma300803b) 124. Jutz F, Buchard A, Kember MR, Fredrickson SB, Williams CK. 2011 Mechanistic investigation and reaction kinetics of the low-pressure copolymerization of cyclohexene oxide and carbon dioxide catalyzed by a dizinc complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 17 395–17 405. (doi:10.1021/ ja206352x) 125. Buchard A, Kember MR, Sandeman KG, Williams CK. 2011 A bimetallic iron(III) catalyst for CO /epoxide coupling. Chem. Commun. 47, 212–214. (doi:10.1039/C0CC02205E) 126. Kember MR, White AJP, Williams CK. 2009 Di- and tri-zinc catalysts for the low-pressure copolymerization of CO and cyclohexene oxide. Inorg. Chem. 48, 9535–9542. (doi:10.1021/ ic901109e) 127. Zhu Y, Romain C, Poirier V, Williams CK. 2015 Influences of a dizinc catalyst and bifunctional chain transfer agents on the polymer architecture in the ring- opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone. Macromolecules 48, 2407–2416. (doi:10.1021/acs. macromol.5b00225) 128. Romain C, Williams CK. 2014 Chemoselective polymerization control: from mixed-monomer feedstock to copolymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1607–1610. (doi:10.1002/anie.201309575) 129. Zhu Y, Romain C, Williams CK. 2015 Selective polymerization catalysis: controlling the metal chain end group to prepare block copolyesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 12 179–12 182. (doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04541)

Journal

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences – Pubmed Central

Published: Feb 28, 2016

There are no references for this article.