Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Naiman (1988)
Animal Influences on Ecosystem DynamicsLarge animals are more than passive components of ecological systemsBioScience, 38
H. Lessios (1988)
MASS MORTALITY OF DIADEMA ANTILLARUM IN THE CARIBBEAN: What Have We Learned?Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 19
D. Botkin (1990)
Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-first Century
M. Hixon, B. Menge (1991)
Species diversity : prey refuges modify the interactive effects of predation and competitionTheoretical Population Biology, 39
S. Carpenter, J. Kitchell (1988)
Consumer Control of Lake ProductivityLarge-scale experimental manipulations reveal complex interactions among lake organismsBioScience, 38
B. Menge, J. Lubchenco (1981)
Community Organization in Temperate and Tropical Rocky Intertidal Habitats: Prey Refuges in Relation to Consumer Pressure GradientsEcological Monographs, 51
R. Paine (1980)
Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructureJournal of Animal Ecology, 49
J. Karr, I. Schlosser, M. Dionne (1992)
9 – Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Regulation of Vertebrate Populations: Lessons from Birds and Fish
R. Elner, R. Vadas (1990)
Inference in Ecology: The Sea Urchin Phenomenon in the Northwestern AtlanticThe American Naturalist, 136
L. Oksanen (1983)
Trophic Exploitation and Arctic Phytomass PatternsThe American Naturalist, 122
P. Dayton (1985)
Ecology of Kelp CommunitiesAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 16
J. McAuliffe (1984)
Resource depression by a stream herbivore: effects on distributions and abundances of other grazersOikos, 42
H. Carney (1990)
A general hypothesis for the strength of food web interactions in relation to trophic state, 24
G. Polis (1991)
Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web TheoryThe American Naturalist, 138
M. Bertness (1984)
Habitat and Community Modification by An Introduced Herbivorous SnailEcology, 65
A. Whicker, J. Detling (1988)
Ecological Consequences of Prairie Dog DisturbancesBioScience, 38
G. Lamberti, V. Resh (1983)
Stream Periphyton and Insect Herbivores: An Experimental Study of Grazing by a Caddisfly PopulationEcology, 64
M. Hunter, P. Price (1992)
Playing Chutes and Ladders: Heterogeneity and the Relative Roles of Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Forces in Natural CommunitiesEcology
C. Huffaker, C. Kennett (1959)
A Ten-Year Study of Vegetational Changes Associated with Biological Control of Klamath Weed.Journal of Range Management, 12
R. Loyn, R. Runnalls, Gail Forward, Jeanie Tyers (1983)
Territorial Bell Miners and Other Birds Affecting Populations of Insect PreyScience, 221
S. Carpenter, J. Kitchell, J. Hodgson, P. Cochran, J. Elser, M. Elser, D. Lodge, D. Kretchmer, Xi He, C. Ende (1987)
Regulation of Lake Primary Productivity by Food Web Structure.Ecology, 68 6
M. Hay, P. Steinberg (1992)
Chapter 10 – The Chemical Ecology of Plant–Herbivore Interactions in Marine versus Terrestrial Communities
G. Woodwell (1991)
Supporting life on Earth.Science, 254 5030
L. Merton, D. Bourn, R. Hnatiuk (1976)
Giant tortoise and vegetation interactions on aldabra atoll—Part 1: InlandBiological Conservation, 9
W. Platt (1975)
The Colonization and Formation of Equilibrium Plant Species Associations on Badger Disturbances in a Tall-Grass PrairieEcological Monographs, 45
R. Kerbes, P. Kotanen, R. Jefferies (1990)
Destruction of wetland habitats by lesser snow geese: a keystone species on the west coast of Hudson Bay.Journal of Applied Ecology, 27
S. Kohler (1992)
Competition and the Structure of a Benthic Stream CommunityEcological Monographs, 62
J. Feminella, M. Power, V. Resh (1989)
Periphyton responses to invertebrate grazing and riparian canopy in three northern California coastal streamsFreshwater Biology, 22
and Lubchenco, S. Gaines (1981)
A Unified Approach to Marine Plant-Herbivore Interactions. I. Populations and CommunitiesAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 12
W. Hill, A. Knight (1987)
Experimental Analysis of the Grazing Interaction Between a Mayfly and Stream Algae.Ecology, 68 6
B. Menge, T. Farrell (1989)
Community Structure and Interaction Webs in Shallow Marine Hard-Bottom Communities: Tests of an Environmental Stress ModelAdvances in Ecological Research, 19
N. Huntly, R. Inouye (1988)
Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanismsBioScience, 38
S. McNaughton (1985)
Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The SerengetiEcological Monographs, 55
James Brown, E. Heske (1990)
Control of a Desert-Grassland Transition by a Keystone Rodent GuildScience, 250
R. Naiman, C. Johnston, J. Kelley (1988)
Alteration of North American streams by beaverBioScience, 38
J. Estes, N. Smith, J. Palmisano (1978)
Sea Otter Predation and Community Organization in the Western Aleutian Islands, AlaskaEcology, 59
B. Menge, A. Olson (1990)
Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure.Trends in ecology & evolution, 5 2
M. Power (1984)
Depth Distributions of Armored Catfish: Predator‐Induced Resource Avoidance?Ecology, 65
R. Warner, P. Chesson (1985)
Coexistence Mediated by Recruitment Fluctuations: A Field Guide to the Storage EffectThe American Naturalist, 125
M. Power, W. Matthews, A. Stewart (1985)
Grazing Minnows, Piscivorous Bass, and Stream Algae: Dynamics of a Strong InteractionEcology, 66
M. Hunter (1992)
10 – Interactions within Herbivore Communities Mediated by the Host Plant: The Keystone Herbivore Concept
J. Pastor, R. Naiman, B. Dewey, Pamela McInnes (1988)
Moose, Microbes, and the Boreal ForestThrough selective browsing, moose change plant communities and ecosystem propertiesBioScience, 38
S. Carpenter, J. Kitchell (1987)
The Temporal Scale of Variance in Limnetic Primary ProductionThe American Naturalist, 129
June 1992 TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES Ecology, 73(3), 1992, pp. 747-754 © 1992 by the Ecological Society of America ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS DONALD R. STRONG Bodega Marine Laboratory, Box 247, Bodega Bay, California 94923 USA base and are aquatic. Analogously, Carney (1990) has INTRODUCTION argued that lenitic cascades are restricted to meso Trophic cascades mean runaway consumption, trophic lakes. The corollary of my assertion is not nec downward dominance through the food chain. Es essarily that top-down forces are unimportant. Rather, pecially vulnerable are the autotrophs. Standing crop consumption is so differentiated in speciose systems and coverage of the plant community are reduced that its overall effects are buffered. Much buffering must wholesale when one or a few species of potent herbi come from defensive adaptations of the autotrophs in vores are not suppressed. In archetypical trophic cas higher diversity systems, of corals and higher plants, cades, overwhelming effects propagate down through adaptations not well developed by the algae and other three trophic levels. Primary carnivores or diseases, by lower plants that are involved in trophic cascades. I suppressing herbivores, switch the substrate from open propose that differentiation and other sorts
Ecology – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.