Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/distinguishing-contextual-performance-from-task-performance-for-g7IcrqEy0c
References (40)
-
W. Borman, L. White, D. Dorsey (1995)
Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratingsJournal of Applied Psychology, 80
-
J. Conway, Allen Huffcutt (1997)
Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings.Human Performance, 10
-
K. Widaman (1985)
Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod DataApplied Psychological Measurement, 9
-
M. Mount, T. Judge, Steven Scullen, Marcia Sytsma, Sarah Hezlett (1998)
TRAIT, RATER AND LEVEL EFFECTS IN 360‐DEGREE PERFORMANCE RATINGSPersonnel Psychology, 51
-
C. Viswesvaran (1993)
Modeling Job Performance: Is There a General Factor? -
W. Borman, S. Motowidlo (1997)
Introduction: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Contextual PerformanceHuman Performance, 10
-
P. Albrecht, E. Glaser, J. Marks (1964)
Validation of a multiple-assessment procedure for managerial personnel.Journal of Applied Psychology, 48
-
J. Conway (1998)
Estimation and Uses of the Proportion of Method Variance for Multitrait-Multimethod DataOrganizational Research Methods, 1
-
M. Mount (1984)
Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance.Personnel Psychology, 37
-
K. Murphy (1992)
Personnel Selection in Organizations -
T. Dickinson, Catherine Hassett, S. Tannenbaum (1986)
Work Performance Ratings: A Meta-Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies. -
R. Holzbach (1978)
Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63
-
S. Motowidlo, W. Borman, Mark Schmit (1997)
A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual PerformanceHuman Performance, 10
-
D. Noer (1995)
Center for Creative LeadershipJournal of Management Development, 14
-
C. Viswesvaran, D. Ones, F. Schmidt (1996)
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratingsJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
-
S. Malka (1990)
Application of the multitrait-multirater approach to performance appraisal in social service organizationsEvaluation and Program Planning, 13
-
W. Borman, S. Motowidlo (1993)
Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance -
D. Kenny, D. Kashy (1992)
Analysis of the multitrait^multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysisPsychological Bulletin, 112
-
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
-
Robert Steel, Nestor Ovalle (1984)
SELF‐APPRAISAL BASED UPON SUPERVISORY FEEDBACKPersonnel Psychology, 37
-
Joseph Rosse, A. Kraut (1983)
Reconsidering the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership.Journal of occupational psychology, 56
-
D. Organ (1997)
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up TimeHuman Performance, 10
-
L. Porter, E. Lawler (1968)
Managerial attitudes and performanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 13
-
W. Borman, S. Motowidlo (1997)
Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection ResearchHuman Performance, 10
-
S. Motowidlo, J. Scotter (1994)
Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
J. Scotter, S. Motowidlo (1996)
Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81
-
K. Murphy, J. Cleveland (1995)
Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives -
J. George, Gareth Jones (1997)
Organizational Spontaneity in ContextHuman Performance, 10
-
J. Conway (1996)
Analysis and Design of Multitrait-Multirater Performance Appraisal StudiesJournal of Management, 22
-
Ronald Morgan (1993)
SELF-AND CO-WORKER PERCEPTIONS OF ETHICS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS TO LEADERSHIP AND SALARYAcademy of Management Journal, 36
-
R. Maccallum, M. Browne, Hazuki Sugawara (1996)
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.Psychological Methods, 1
-
H. Marsh (1989)
Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: Many Problems and a Few SolutionsApplied Psychological Measurement, 13
-
Michael Harris, J. Schaubroeck (1988)
A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings.Personnel Psychology, 41
-
N. Schmitt, B. Saari (1978)
Behavior, Situation, And Rater Variance In Descriptions Of Leader Behaviors.Multivariate behavioral research, 13 4
-
H. Heneman (1974)
Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59
-
W. Borman, D. Brush (1993)
More Progress Toward a Taxonomy of Managerial Performance RequirementsHuman Performance, 6
-
R. Sitgreaves (1979)
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).Psyccritiques, 24
-
Joseph Cote, M. Buckley (1987)
Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies:Journal of Marketing Research, 24
-
C. Viswesvaran, D. Ones (1995)
Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modelingPersonnel Psychology, 48
-
E. Lawler (1967)
The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 51 5
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1999 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0021-9010
- eISSN
- 1939-1854
- DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to extend previous research on the contextual and task performance distinction to managerial jobs. It was hypothesized that, unlike results for nonmanagerial work, the job dedication facet of contextual performance would contribute uniquely to overall managerial performance. The interpersonal facilitation facet of contextual performance was expected to be redundant with leadership task performance and therefore not to make a unique contribution. A multitrait–multirater correlation matrix was developed on the basis of meta-analysis. Structural equation modeling results generally supported the hypotheses, although there was some evidence of a unique contribution by interpersonal facilitation. Results also suggested that peers paid more attention to interpersonal facilitation when making overall performance ratings, whereas supervisors paid more attention to task performance.
Journal
Journal of Applied Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Feb 1, 1999