Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
U. Nauber, M. Pankratz, A. Kienlin, E. Seifert, Ume Klemm, H. Jäckle (1988)
Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor-like protein encoded by the gap gene knirpsNature, 336
R. Lehmann (1988)
Phenotypic comparison between maternal and zygotic genes controlling the segmental pattern of the Drosophila embryoDevelopment, 104
K. Sander, R. Lehmann (1988)
Drosophila nurse cells produce a posterior signal required for embryonic segmentation and polarityNature, 335
W. Driever, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1988)
A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryosCell, 54
M. Lohs-Schardin, C. Cremer, Christiane Nu¨sslein-Volhard (1979)
A fate map for the larval epidermis of Drosophila melanogaster: localized cuticle defects following irradiation of the blastoderm with an ultraviolet laser microbeam.Developmental biology, 73 2
D. Tautz (1988)
Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centresNature, 332
C. Nüsslein-Volhard, E. Wieschaus (1980)
Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in DrosophilaNature, 287
C. Nüsslein-Volhard, H. Frohnhöfer, R. Lehmann (1987)
Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila.Science, 238 4834
D. Tautz, R. Lehmann, H. Schnürch, R. Schuh, E. Seifert, A. Kienlin, K. Jones, H. Jäckle (1987)
Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genesNature, 327
R. Lehmann, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1987)
hunchback, a gene required for segmentation of an anterior and posterior region of the Drosophila embryo.Developmental biology, 119 2
W. Driever, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1989)
The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryoNature, 337
W. Driever, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1988)
The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent mannerCell, 54
H. Frohnhöfer, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1986)
Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoidNature, 324
P. Ingham (1988)
The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in DrosophilaNature, 335
T. Berleth, M. Burri, Gudrun Thoma, D. Bopp, Sibyll Richstein, Gabriella, Frigerio, Markus, Noll, Christiane, Nusslein-Volhard (1988)
The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo.The EMBO Journal, 7
M. Akam (1987)
The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo.Development, 101 1
R. Lehmann, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1987)
Involvement of the pumilio gene in the transport of an abdominal signal in the Drosophila embryoNature, 329
M. Hülskamp, C. Schröder, C. Pfeifle, H. Jäckle, D. Tautz (1989)
Posterior segmentation of the Drosophila embryo in the absence of a maternal posterior organizer geneNature, 338
R. Lehmann, C. Nüsslein-Volhard (1986)
Abdominal segmentation, pole cell formation, and embryonic polarity require the localized activity of oskar, a maternal gene in drosophilaCell, 47
G. Frigerio, M. Burri, D. Bopp, S. Baumgartner, M. Noll (1986)
Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene networkCell, 47
THE development of the body plan in the Drosophila embryo depends on the activity of maternal determinants localized at the anterior and posterior of the egg. These activities define both the polarity of the anterior-posterior (AP) axis and the spatial domains of expression of the zygotic gap genes1,2, which in turn control the subsequent steps in segmentation2,3. The nature and mode of action of one anterior determinant, the bicoid(bcd) gene product, has recently been defined4–8, but the posterior determinants are less well characterized. At least seven maternally acting genes are required for posterior development1,9–11. Mutations in these maternal posterior-group genes result in embryos lacking all abdominal segments. Cytoplasmic transplantation studies indicate that the maternally encoded product of the nanos(nos) gene may act as an abdominal determinant, whereas the other maternal posterior-group genes appear to be required for the appropriate localization and stabilization of this signal1,9–12. Here we show that the lack of the nos gene product can be compensated for by eliminating the maternal activity of the gap gene hunchback (hb). Embryos lacking both of these maternally derived gene products are viable and can survive as fertile adults. These results suggest that the nos gene product functions by repressing the activity of the maternal hb products in the posterior of the egg.
Nature – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 20, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.