Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Blau (1964)
Exchange and Power in Social Life
H. Kelman (1961)
PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGEPublic Opinion Quarterly, 25
D. Druckman (1973)
Human factors in internation negotiations: Social‐psychological aspects of international conflict, 2
L. A. Froman, M. D. Cohen (1970)
Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes, 15
C. R. Rogers (1961)
On becoming a person
C. Sherif, R. Bales (1971)
Personality and Interpersonal Behavior.American Sociological Review, 36
B. Russell (1931)
Power
M. Nicholson (1967)
The Resolution of Conflict, 130
J. Thibaut, H. Kelley (1960)
The social psychology of groups
F. Heider (1958)
The psychology of interpersonal relations
B. Schlenker, B. Helm, J. Tedeschi (1973)
The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust.Journal of personality and social psychology, 25 3
W. J. McGuire (1969)
Handbook of social psychology, 3
G. Simmel (1950)
The sociology of G. Simmel
G. Hardin (1974)
Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor, 8
T. Bonoma, T. Milburn (1977)
Social Conflict: Another LookJournal of Social Issues, 33
M. Deutsch (1969)
Conflicts: Productive and Destructive*Journal of Social Issues, 25
Lewis Froman, Michael Cohen (1970)
Research reports. Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processesSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 15
A. Rapoport, T. Schelling (1961)
The Strategy of Conflict.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56
Nigel Armistead (1974)
Reconstructing social psychology.
L. Wispé (1972)
Positive Forms of Social Behavior: An OverviewJournal of Social Issues, 28
P. Ekeh, G. Homans (1975)
Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.Contemporary Sociology, 5
W. H. Riker (1974)
Perspectives on social power
J. T. Tedeschi, T. V. Bonoma (1972)
The social influence processes
T. Nardin (1968)
Communication and the effect of threats in strategic interaction. Peace Research Society (International), 9
W. Gamson (1975)
The strategy of social protest
J. Harsanyi (2007)
Measurement of social power, opportunity costs, and the theory of two-person bargaining games.Behavioral science, 7
M. Freedman, L. Coser (1959)
The Functions of Social ConflictBritish Journal of Sociology, 10
E. Fromm. (1974)
The Anatomy of Human DestructivenessTransforming Terror
K. E. Boulding (1964)
International conflict and behavioral science
P. Brickman (1974)
Social conflict
T. Parsons (1967)
Sociological theory and modern society
S. Hoffmann (1969)
International Conflict for Beginners.American Journal of International Law, 65
H. Sullivan (1953)
The interpersonal theory of psychiatry
D. Rougemont (1940)
Love in the Western World
J. T. Tedeschi, B. R. Schlenker, T. V. Bonoma (1973)
Conflict, power and games: The experimental study of interpersonal relations
J. Thibaut, C. Faucheux (1965)
The development of contractual norms in a bargaining situation under two types of stressJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1
E. Brunswik (1952)
International encyclopedia of unified science, 1
J. Z. Rubin, B. R. Brown (1975)
Social psychology of bargaining and negotiations
C. Rogers (1956)
Becoming a personPastoral Psychology, 7
R. Bendix (1962)
Max Weber: An intellectual portrait
The central variables of power, conflict, cooperation and trust have traditionally been employed in a context‐irrelevant fashion as general theoretical explanations for many social phenomena at the levels of organisms or persons, groups, organizations, societies and even supranational systems. This paper questions the assumed high cross‐system applicability of these concepts by outlining three different prototypical power systems which seem to find frequent expression in everyday life: the unilateral power system, in which a strong source imposes influence on a weak target; the mixed power system, in which partially equivalent interactants bargain to agreement or deadlock; and the bilateral power system, in which interactants are in unit relation and formulate joint policy programs. Power, conflict, cooperation and trust are all found to require substantially different definition and treatment when considered in one as opposed to another of these prototypical systems.
Systems Research & Behavioral Science – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 1976
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.