Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Differing perceptions in the feedback process

Differing perceptions in the feedback process Feedback is central to the development of effective learning, yet is comparatively underresearched. This article seeks to examine the notion of written feedback on assignments and argue that this feedback process is more complex than is sometimes acknowledged. The author illustrates the problematic nature of assignment feedback by drawing on a large‐scale questionnaire survey conducted across eight universities, and then analysing the issue in more depth though fine‐grained data collected from students in a teacher education institute. The article is framed by the concepts of discourse, power and emotion. It highlights a number of different perceptions of students and tutors towards the assessment, marking and feedback process. The author concludes by arguing that ‘assessment dialogues’ are a way forward to mitigate some of the mistrust or misconceptions that may be unwanted outcomes of the assessment process. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Higher Education Taylor & Francis

Differing perceptions in the feedback process

Studies in Higher Education , Volume 31 (2): 15 – Apr 1, 2006
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/differing-perceptions-in-the-feedback-process-e7jRLn413N

References (35)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Society for Research into Higher Education
ISSN
1470-174X
eISSN
0307-5079
DOI
10.1080/03075070600572132
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Feedback is central to the development of effective learning, yet is comparatively underresearched. This article seeks to examine the notion of written feedback on assignments and argue that this feedback process is more complex than is sometimes acknowledged. The author illustrates the problematic nature of assignment feedback by drawing on a large‐scale questionnaire survey conducted across eight universities, and then analysing the issue in more depth though fine‐grained data collected from students in a teacher education institute. The article is framed by the concepts of discourse, power and emotion. It highlights a number of different perceptions of students and tutors towards the assessment, marking and feedback process. The author concludes by arguing that ‘assessment dialogues’ are a way forward to mitigate some of the mistrust or misconceptions that may be unwanted outcomes of the assessment process.

Journal

Studies in Higher EducationTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.