Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Workman, J. Niswander (1970)
Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago.American journal of human genetics, 22 1
J. Storz, H. Bhat, T. Kunz (2000)
Social structure of a polygynous tent-making bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Megachiroptera)Journal of Zoology, 251
M. Uyenoyama (1984)
INBREEDING AND THE EVOLUTION OF ALTRUISM UNDER KIN SELECTION: EFFECTS ON RELATEDNESS AND GROUP STRUCTUREEvolution, 38
M. C. Whitlock (1992)
Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populationsAnn. Eugen., 139
T. Pope (1992)
THE INFLUENCE OF DISPERSAL PATTERNS AND MATING SYSTEM ON GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION WITHIN AND BETWEEN POPULATIONS OF THE RED HOWLER MONKEY (ALOUATTA SENICULUS)Evolution, 46
H. Aldridge (1988)
Recent Advances in the Study of Bats, M. Brock Fenton, Paul Racey, Jeremy M.V. Rayner (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987), xiiAnimal Behaviour, 36
D. Hartl, A. Clark (1981)
Principles of population genetics
J. Balasingh, J. Koilraj, T. H. Kunz (1995)
Tent construction by the short‐nosed fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) in southern IndiaEthology, 100
Derrick Sugg, R. Chesser, F. Dobson, J. Hoogland (1996)
Population genetics meets behavioral ecology.Trends in ecology & evolution, 11 8
A. E. Pusey, C. Packer (1987)
Primate societiesGenetics
H. R. Bhat, T. H. Kunz (1995)
Altered flower/fruit clusters of the kitul palm used as roosts by the short‐nosed fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae)Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 235
M. J. Wade (1996)
AdaptationBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
Z. Halpin, Leonard Radinsky, W. Provine (1989)
Mammalian Dispersal Patterns: The Effects of Social Structure on Population GeneticsBioScience
G. F. McCracken (1987)
Recent advances in the study of batsEvolution
J. Storz (1999)
Genetic Consequences of Mammalian Social StructureJournal of Mammalogy, 80
J. Patton, Juliana Feder (1981)
MICROSPATIAL GENETIC HETEROGENEITY IN POCKET GOPHERS: NON‐RANDOM BREEDING AND DRIFTEvolution, 35
M. Whitlock, D. Mccauley (1990)
SOME POPULATION GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF COLONY FORMATION AND EXTINCTION: GENETIC CORRELATIONS WITHIN FOUNDING GROUPSEvolution, 44
A. E. Pusey, M. Wolf (1996)
Inbreeding avoidance in animalsJ. Mammal., 11
J. F. Storz, T. H. Kunz (1999)
Cynopterus sphinxGenetics, 613
B. Weir, C. Cockerham (1984)
ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTUREEvolution, 38
M. J. Wade, C. J. Goodnight (1998)
The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experimentsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 52
F. Dobson (1982)
Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammalsAnimal Behaviour, 30
J. Goudet (1995)
FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-StatisticsJournal of Heredity, 86
(1987)
Philopatry and dispersal
J. Rogers (1990)
Mammalian dispersal patterns: The effects of social structure on population geneticsJournal of Human Evolution, 19
P. Greenwood (1980)
Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammalsAnimal Behaviour, 28
R. Greenberg (1969)
BiometryThe Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 42
G. S. Wilkinson (1985a)
The social organization of the common vampire bat. I. Pattern and cause of association, 17
A. Pusey, Marisa Wolf (1996)
Inbreeding avoidance in animals.Trends in ecology & evolution, 11 5
J. Goudet (1995)
FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F‐statisticsAnim. Behav., 86
(1987)
Kin selection in complex groups: mating structure, migration structure, and the evolution of social behaviors
M. Wade, C. Goodnight (1998)
PERSPECTIVE: THE THEORIES OF FISHER AND WRIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF METAPOPULATIONS: WHEN NATURE DOES MANY SMALL EXPERIMENTSEvolution, 52
G. Wilkinson, G. McCracken (1985)
ON ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERSEvolution, 39
Joanne Daly, James Patton (1990)
DISPERSAL, GENE FLOW, AND ALLELIC DIVERSITY BETWEEN LOCAL POPULATIONS OF THOMOMYS BOTTAE POCKET GOPHERS IN THE COASTAL RANGES OF CALIFORNIAEvolution, 44
T. Prout (1981)
A note on the island model with sex dependent migrationJ. Hered., 59
M. Raymond, F. Rousset (1995)
GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism
G. F. McCracken, J. W. Bradbury (1981)
Social organization and kinship in the polygynous bat Phyllostomus hastatusEvolution, 8
M. Raymond, F. Rousset (1995)
AN EXACT TEST FOR POPULATION DIFFERENTIATIONEvolution, 49
M. Bérubé, H. JØrgensen, Ross McEwing, P. Palsbøll (2000)
Identification of microsatellite loci in the water‐rat Nectomys squamipes (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae)Molecular Ecology, 9
Ronald Chesser (1991)
Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations.Genetics, 129 2
G. Bush, S. Case, A. Wilson, J. Patton (1977)
Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 74 9
A. Pusey (1987)
Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals.Trends in ecology & evolution, 2 10
R. E. Michod (1993)
The natural history of inbreeding and outbreedingTheor. Appl. Genet.
Jay Storz, H. Bhat, T. Kunz (2001)
GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF POLYGYNY AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN AN INDIAN FRUIT BAT, CYNOPTERUS SPHINX. II. VARIANCE IN MALE MATING SUCCESS AND EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE, 55
Ronald Chesser (1991)
Gene diversity and female philopatry.Genetics, 127 2
S. Wright (1965)
THE INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION STRUCTURE BY F‐STATISTICS WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO SYSTEMS OF MATINGEvolution, 19
Sun-Wei Guo, E. Thompson (1992)
Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles.Biometrics, 48 2
P. Smouse, V. Vitzthum, J. Neel (1981)
The impact of random and lineal fission of the genetic divergence of small human groups: a case study among the Yanomama.Genetics, 98 1
S. Wright (1943)
Isolation by Distance.Genetics, 28 2
S. Wright (1922)
Coefficients of Inbreeding and RelationshipThe American Naturalist, 56
(1976)
Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats . I . Field studies
J. Altmann (1979)
Age cohorts as paternal sibshipsBehav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 6
C. F. Williams (1986)
Social organization of the bat, Carollia perspicillata (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae), 71
Ronald Chesser, O. Rhodes, Derrick Sugg, Andrew Schnabel (1993)
Effective sizes for subdivided populations.Genetics, 135 4
(1977)
Long 1986 Pope 1992 crete age-cohorts can provide a powerful mode of inference about the interplay between drift and gene flow
M. Whitlock, N. Barton (1997)
The effective size of a subdivided population.Genetics, 146 1
Jay Storz, J. Balasingh, P. Nathan, K. Emmanuel, T. Kunz (2000)
Dispersion and site fidelity in a tent-roosting population of the short-nosed fruit bat (Cynopterus sphinx) in southern IndiaJournal of Tropical Ecology, 16
J. Neel, R. Ward (1972)
The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. VI. Analysis by F-statistics (including a comparison with the Makiritare and Xavante).Genetics, 72 4
L. Nunney (1999)
THE EFFECTIVE SIZE OF A HIERARCHICALLY STRUCTURED POPULATIONEvolution, 53
N. Barton, M. Whitlock (1997)
The Evolution of Metapopulations
T. Clutton‐Brock (1989)
Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammalsNature, 337
J. Long (1986)
The allelic correlation structure of Gainj- and Kalam-speaking people. I. The estimation and interpretation of Wright's F-statistics.Genetics, 112 3
J. Goudet, Michel Raymond, M. Raymond, T. de-Meeus, F. Rousset (1996)
Testing differentiation in diploid populations.Genetics, 144 4
F. S. Dobson (1982)
Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammalsMol. Ecol., 30
M. Whitlock (1992)
Nonequilibrium Population Structure in Forked Fungus Beetles: Extinction, Colonization, and the Genetic Variance Among PopulationsThe American Naturalist, 139
Jinliang Wang, A. Caballero (1999)
Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populationsHeredity, 82
F. Dobson, R. Chesser, J. Hoogland, Derrick Sugg, D. Foltz (1998)
Breeding groups and gene dynamics in a socially structured population of prairie dogsJournal of Mammalogy, 79
C. Ray, M. Hoopes, I. Hanski, M. Gilpin (1997)
Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution
R. Spielman, J. Neel, F. Li (1977)
Inbreeding estimation from population data: models, procedures and implications.Genetics, 85 2
P. L. Workman, J. D. Niswander (1970)
Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes, 22
Jinliang Wang (1997)
Effective size and F-statistics of subdivided populations. II. Dioecious species.Genetics, 146 4
G. S. Wilkinson (1985b)
The social organization of the common vampire bat. II. Mating system, genetic structure, and relatedness, 17
(1996)
Adaptation in subdivided populations: kin selection and interdemic selection
H. Bhat, T. Kunz (1995)
Altered flower/fruit clusters of the kitul palm used as roosts by the short‐nosed fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae)Journal of Zoology, 235
A. Wilson, G. Bush, S. Case, Mary King (1975)
Social structuring of mammalian populations and rate of chromosomal evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72 12
Jay Storz, J. Balasingh, H. Bhat, P. Nathan, D. Doss, Atish Prakash, THOMAS Kunz (2001)
Clinal variation in body size and sexual dimorphism in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae)Biological Journal of The Linnean Society, 72
K. Goodnight, D. Queller (1999)
Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markersMolecular Ecology, 8
(1993)
The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding in small mammals
S. Wright (1950)
Genetical Structure of PopulationsBritish Medical Journal, 2
J. Neel (1972)
The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama IndiansAnnals of Human Genetics, 35
D. Queller, K. Goodnight (1989)
ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERSEvolution, 43
F. S. Dobson, R. K. Chesser, J. L. Hoogland, D. W. Sugg, D. W. Foltz (1998)
Breeding groups and gene dynamics in a socially structured population of prairie dogsJ. Hered., 79
J. F. Storz, J. Balasingh, H. R. Bhat, P. T. Nathan, A. Prakash, D. P. Swami Doss, T. H. Kunz (2001a)
Clinal variation in body size and sexual dimorphism in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae)Am. Nat., 72
Jinliang Wang (1997)
Effective size and F-statistics of subdivided populations. I. Monoecious species with partial selfing.Genetics, 146 4
(1999)
Cynopterus sphinx . Mammal
(1993)
Inbreeding and the evolution of social behavior
J. F. Storz (2000)
Variation at tri‐ and tetranucleotide repeat microsatellite loci in the fruit bat genus Cynopterus (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae)Evolution, 9
Abstract.— Population subdivision into behaviorally cohesive kin groups influences rates of inbreeding and genetic drift and has important implications for the evolution of social behavior. Here we report the results of a study designed to test the hypothesis that harem social structure promotes inbreeding and genetic subdivision in a population with overlapping generations. Genetic consequences of harem social structure were investigated in a natural population of a highly polygynous fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae), in western India. The partitioning of genetic variance within and among breeding groups was assessed using 10‐locus microsatellite genotypes for 431 individually marked bats. Genetic analysis of the C. sphinx study population was integrated with field data on demography and social structure to determine the specific ways in which mating, dispersal, and new social group formation influenced population genetic structure. Microsatellite data revealed striking contrasts in genetic structure between consecutive offspring cohorts and between generations. Relative to the 1998 (dry‐season) offspring cohort, the 1997 (wet‐season) cohort was characterized by a more extensive degree of within‐group heterozygote excess (FIS=−0.164 vs. −0.050), a greater degree of among‐group subdivision (FST= 0.123 vs. 0.008), and higher average within‐group relatedness (r= 0.251 vs. 0.017). Differences in genetic structure between the two offspring cohorts were attributable to seasonal differences in the number and proportional representation of male parents. Relative to adult age‐classes, offspring cohorts were characterized by more extensive departures from allelic and genotypic equilibria and a greater degree of genetic subdivision. Generational differences in F‐statistics indicated that genetic structuring of offspring cohorts was randomized by natal dispersal prior to recruitment into the breeding population. Low relatedness among harem females (r= 0.002–0.005) was primarily attributable to high rates of natal dispersal and low rates of juvenile survivorship. Kin selection is therefore an unlikely explanation for the formation and maintenance of behaviorally cohesive breeding groups in this highly social mammal.
Evolution – Oxford University Press
Published: Jun 1, 2001
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.