Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Edelsohn, V. Hiday (1990)
Civil commitment: a range of patient attitudes.The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 18 1
R. Kaltiala-Heino (1996)
Involuntary psychiatric treatmentNordic Journal of Psychiatry, 50
(1996)
A study of the effect and outcome of the use of community treatment orders and community counselling orders in New South Wales in 1991
W. Gardner, C. Lidz, S. Hoge, J. Monahan, M. Eisenberg, N. Bennett, E. Mulvey, L. Roth (1999)
Patients' revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalization.The American journal of psychiatry, 156 9
(2004)
Draft Mental Health Bill
L. Stein, R. Diamond (2000)
Commentary: a "systems"-based alternative to mandatory outpatient treatment.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28 2
J. Dawson, S. Romans (2001)
Uses of Community Treatment Orders in New Zealand: Early FindingsAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35
Charles Rapp, W. Shera, W. Kisthardt (1993)
Research strategies for consumer empowerment of people with severe mental illness.Social work, 38 6
W. Gove, T. Fain (1977)
A comparison of voluntary and committed psychiatric patients.Archives of general psychiatry, 34 6
A. Gibbs, J. Dawson, Hine Forsyth, R. Mullen (2004)
Maori Experience of Community Treatment Orders in Otago, New ZealandAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38
N. Spence, R. Goldney, W. Costain (1988)
Attitudes towards psychiatric hospitalisation: a comparison of involuntary and voluntary patients.Australian clinical review, 8 30
J. Dawson, S. Romans, A. Gibbs, N. Ratter (2003)
Ambivalence about community treatment orders.International journal of law and psychiatry, 26 3
J. Atkinson, H. Garner, W. Gilmour, J. Dyer (2002)
Changes to leave of absence in Scotland: the views of patientsThe Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 13
K. Canvin, A. Bartlett, V. Pinfold (2002)
A 'bittersweet pill to swallow': learning from mental health service users' responses to compulsory community care in England.Health & social care in the community, 10 5
T. Scheid-Cook (1993)
Controllers and controlled: an analysis of participant constructions of outpatient commitmentSociology of Health and Illness, 15
(2004)
How MIND wants the Draft Mental Health Bill changed: 4
J. Petrila, M. Ridgely, R. Borum (2003)
Debating Outpatient Commitment: Controversy, Trends, and Empirical DataCrime & Delinquency, 49
S. Romans, J. Dawson, R. Mullen, A. Gibbs (2004)
How Mental Health Clinicians View Community Treatment Orders: A National New Zealand SurveyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38
P. Conlon, H. Merskey, C. Zilli, K. Frommhold (1990)
The Attitudes toward Committal of Patients Hospitalized in a Psychiatric Facility for the First TimeThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 35
Donald Thomas (2003)
A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis
V. Pinfold, J. Bindman, Graham Thornicroft, D. Franklin, Barbara Hatfield (2001)
Persuading the persuadable: evaluating compulsory treatment in England using Supervised Discharge OrdersSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36
P. Power (1999)
Community treatment orders: The Australian experienceJournal of Forensic Psychiatry, 10
Background: New Zealand operates a well-embedded community treatment order scheme for patients with serious mental disorders. A similar scheme may be enacted for England and Wales.Aim: To explore the views of patients with recent experience of community treatment orders.Method: All patients in one region under an order in the last 2 years, not readmitted to hospital for at least 6 months, were included, subject to their capacity and consent. Forty-two patients out of 84 potential participants were interviewed.Results: The majority of patients were generally supportive of the community treatment order, especially if the alternative was hospital. Many valued the access to services and sense of security obtained, and attributed improvements in their health to treatment under the order. They also experienced reduced choice about medication and restrictions on residence and travel. For a minority this meant they were strongly opposed to the order, but for most the restrictions did not unduly hinder them. The majority of patients viewed the order as a helpful step towards community stability.Conclusions: The usefulness of community treatment orders is accepted by most patients under them in NZ, as well as by most psychiatrists. Critical factors include the quality of therapeutic relationships and the structure provided for community mental health care.
Journal of Mental Health – Taylor & Francis
Published: Aug 1, 2005
Keywords: Mental health; patients; community treatment orders; outpatient commitment
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.