Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

State Bureaucratic Discretion and the Administration of Social Welfare Programs: The Case of Social Security Disability

State Bureaucratic Discretion and the Administration of Social Welfare Programs: The Case of... Abstract The impact of the bureaucracy on policy programs through the use of discretion has been both applauded and bemoaned by scholars. By examining variation in the implementation of the Social Security Disability program in the fifty states, this article explores the impact of state level environmental characteristics on the use of discretion. Specifically this article tests whether street-level bureaucracies respond to local economic, political, and task factors. The case of Social Security Disability is particularly interesting because state officials have an incentive to increase the number of disability recipients since the federal government funds the entire program. The findings in the article indicate that variation in the implementation of the Social Security Disability program is a function of levels of need for benefits, the health of the economy, and state partisan politics. Taken together the findings suggest that professional norms play a large role in directing the ways that street-level bureaucrats use their discretion. The implementation of the Social Security program is not, however, apolitical. While the bureaucracy is professional, it is also responsive to local political concerns. Although street-level bureaucracies seem open to influence from political officials, they do not respond to fiscal stress on state governments nor to high levels of social commitments. This indicates that state governments do not use the disability program strategically, but play a more indirect role by creating an environment that is ideologically more or less generous with regard to social welfare programs. © 1999 by the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Oxford University Press

State Bureaucratic Discretion and the Administration of Social Welfare Programs: The Case of Social Security Disability

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/state-bureaucratic-discretion-and-the-administration-of-social-welfare-dmk6upBdVZ

References (38)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 1999 by the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.
ISSN
1053-1858
eISSN
1477-9803
DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024407
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The impact of the bureaucracy on policy programs through the use of discretion has been both applauded and bemoaned by scholars. By examining variation in the implementation of the Social Security Disability program in the fifty states, this article explores the impact of state level environmental characteristics on the use of discretion. Specifically this article tests whether street-level bureaucracies respond to local economic, political, and task factors. The case of Social Security Disability is particularly interesting because state officials have an incentive to increase the number of disability recipients since the federal government funds the entire program. The findings in the article indicate that variation in the implementation of the Social Security Disability program is a function of levels of need for benefits, the health of the economy, and state partisan politics. Taken together the findings suggest that professional norms play a large role in directing the ways that street-level bureaucrats use their discretion. The implementation of the Social Security program is not, however, apolitical. While the bureaucracy is professional, it is also responsive to local political concerns. Although street-level bureaucracies seem open to influence from political officials, they do not respond to fiscal stress on state governments nor to high levels of social commitments. This indicates that state governments do not use the disability program strategically, but play a more indirect role by creating an environment that is ideologically more or less generous with regard to social welfare programs. © 1999 by the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.

Journal

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory – Oxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.