Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale

Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of... The concept of affordances in communication technology research has proven to be heuristically provocative, yet perceived affordances are rarely measured. After extracting commonly cited social affordances from the literature, we developed a measure to assess participants’ perceptions of these affordances. The scale was tested across eight communication channels in two studies (face-to-face; texting; phone; email; posts on social networking sites, specifically Facebook; instant messaging; Skype videoconferencing; and mobile app Snapchat). A factor structure was developed in Study 1 and confirmed in Study 2. The resultant Perceived Social Affordances of Communication Channels Scale includes 41 items measuring 10 communicative affordances: accessibility, bandwidth, social presence, privacy, network association, personalization, persistence, editability, conversation control, and anonymity. Potential methodological and theoretical applications are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Communication Monographs Taylor & Francis

Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale

Communication Monographs , Volume 84 (3): 21 – Jul 3, 2017

Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale

Communication Monographs , Volume 84 (3): 21 – Jul 3, 2017

Abstract

The concept of affordances in communication technology research has proven to be heuristically provocative, yet perceived affordances are rarely measured. After extracting commonly cited social affordances from the literature, we developed a measure to assess participants’ perceptions of these affordances. The scale was tested across eight communication channels in two studies (face-to-face; texting; phone; email; posts on social networking sites, specifically Facebook; instant messaging; Skype videoconferencing; and mobile app Snapchat). A factor structure was developed in Study 1 and confirmed in Study 2. The resultant Perceived Social Affordances of Communication Channels Scale includes 41 items measuring 10 communicative affordances: accessibility, bandwidth, social presence, privacy, network association, personalization, persistence, editability, conversation control, and anonymity. Potential methodological and theoretical applications are discussed.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/distinguishing-technologies-for-social-interaction-the-perceived-dPQWDfAxRn

References (78)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2017 National Communication Association
ISSN
1479-5787
eISSN
0363-7751
DOI
10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The concept of affordances in communication technology research has proven to be heuristically provocative, yet perceived affordances are rarely measured. After extracting commonly cited social affordances from the literature, we developed a measure to assess participants’ perceptions of these affordances. The scale was tested across eight communication channels in two studies (face-to-face; texting; phone; email; posts on social networking sites, specifically Facebook; instant messaging; Skype videoconferencing; and mobile app Snapchat). A factor structure was developed in Study 1 and confirmed in Study 2. The resultant Perceived Social Affordances of Communication Channels Scale includes 41 items measuring 10 communicative affordances: accessibility, bandwidth, social presence, privacy, network association, personalization, persistence, editability, conversation control, and anonymity. Potential methodological and theoretical applications are discussed.

Journal

Communication MonographsTaylor & Francis

Published: Jul 3, 2017

Keywords: Affordances; channel selection; computer-mediated communication; social media; texting; face-to-face communication

There are no references for this article.