Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Thoday (1959)
Effects of disruptive selectionHeredity, 13
J. Gale, M. Kearsey (1968)
Stable equilibria under stabilising selection in the absence of dominanceHeredity, 23
R. Curnow (1964)
The effect of continued selection of phenotypic intermediates on gene frequencyGenetics Research, 5
J. Rendel (1943)
VARIATIONS IN THE WEIGHTS OF HATCHED AND UNHATCHED DUCKS' EGGSBiometrika, 33
K. Jayant (1966)
Birth weight and survival: a hospital survey repeated after 15 yearsAnnals of Human Genetics, 29
Alan Robertson (1952)
The Effect of Inbreeding on the Variation Due to Recessive Genes.Genetics, 37 2
A Robertson (1956)
The effect of selection against extreme deviants based on deviation or on homozygosis.J Genetics, 54
Sewall Wright (1935)
The analysis of variance and the correlations between relatives with respect to deviations from an optimum.J Genetics, 30
DS Falconer (1957)
Selection for phenotypic intermediates in Drosophila.J Genetics, 55
J. Thoday (1958)
Homeostasis in a selection experimentHeredity, 12
M. Singh, R. Lewontin (1966)
Stable equilibria under optimizing selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 56 4
JM Thoday (1959)
Effects of disruptive selection. I. Genetic flexibility.Heredity, 13
T Prout (1962)
The effects of stabilising selection on the time of development in D. melanogaster.Genet Res, 3
T. Prout (1962)
The effects of stabilizing selection on the time of development in Drosophila melanogasterGenetics Research, 3
E. Reeve, F. Robertson (1953)
Analysis of Environmental Variability in Quantitative InheritanceNature, 171
M. Karn, L. Penrose (1952)
Birth weight and gestation time in relation to maternal age, parity and infant survival.Annals of eugenics, 16
B. Barnes (1968)
Stabilising selection in Drosophila melanogasterHeredity, 23
B. Latter (1960)
Natural selection for an intermediate optimum.Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 13
W. Scharloo (1964)
THE EFFECT OF DISRUPTIVE AND STABILIZING SELECTION ON THE EXPRESSION OF A CUBITUS INTERRUPTUS MUTANT IN DROSOPHILA.Genetics, 50
Selection in both constant and fluctuating temperature environments for a constant bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster resulted in the maintenance of that number and in a decrease of both genetic and environmental variance. Although mean bristle number in the control lines increased over the early-generations there was a significant net decrease. Phenotypic variance decreased significantly, especially in later generations. In both control lines and in the line selected at 20–29° C. there was a significant decrease in asymmetry of bristle number. There was also a decrease in environmental variance in these three lines. Transplant experiments showed that when the lines were cultured in alien environments phenotypic variance tended to increase in the fluctuating and decrease in the constant temperature environment. However at generation 39, the phenotypic variance of lines selected in the fluctuating environment increased when samples of the lines were cultured in the constant temperature environment. The results indicate that stabilising selection can be effective in both fluctuating and constant temperature environments.
Heredity – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 1974
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.