Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gerald Sondhi, A. Fried, Dov (1993)
The analysis and use of financial statements
Loïc Wulf, Puwei Xu (2010)
Acquisitions: Poison Pill for Innovation?
George Fenn, Nellie Liang (2000)
Corporate Payout Policy and Managerial Stock IncentivesBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Research Series
R. Cyert, J. March (1964)
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
G. Ahuja, Curba Lampert, V. Tandon (2008)
1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological InnovationThe Academy of Management Annals, 2
P. Bromiley (2004)
The Behavioral Foundations of Strategic Management
L. Gómez‐Mejía, C. Cruz, P. Berrone, J. Castro (2011)
The Bind that Ties: Socioemotional Wealth Preservation in Family FirmsThe Academy of Management Annals, 5
S. Winter, R. Nelson (1983)
An evolutionary theory of economic change
D. Balkin, L. Gómez‐Mejía (1987)
Toward a contingency theory of compensation strategySouthern Medical Journal, 8
Joanna Tochman Campbell is an Assistant Professor at the University of Arkansas
James Chrisman, Pankaj Patel (2012)
Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion PerspectivesAcademy of Management Journal, 55
William Johnson, Qing Liu (2011)
Patenting and the role of technology markets in regional innovation in China: An empirical analysisThe Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22
Geoffrey Martin, L. Gómez‐Mejía, R. Wiseman (2013)
Executive stock options as mixed gambles: Revisiting the behavioral agency modelAcademy of Management Journal, 56
Alfredo Massis, F. Frattini, U. Lichtenthaler (2013)
Research on Technological Innovation in Family FirmsFamily Business Review, 26
L. Gómez‐Mejía, Manuel Núñez-Nickel, Isabel Gutiérrez (2001)
The Role of Family Ties in Agency ContractsAcademy of Management Journal, 44
R. Wiseman, L. Gómez‐Mejía (1998)
A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk TakingAcademy of Management Review, 23
Timothy Palmer, R. Wiseman (1999)
Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: a holistic model of riskStrategic Management Journal, 20
(1999)
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
James Ang, Rebel Cole, James Lin (2000)
Agency Costs and Ownership StructureJournal of Finance, 55
Stephen Nesbitt (1994)
LONG‐TERM REWARDS FROM SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM: A STUDY OF THE “CalPERS EFFECT”Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 6
X. Chang, S. Dasgupta (2006)
Target Behavior and Financing: How Conclusive is the Evidence?Empirical Corporate Finance: Capital Structure
D. Staiger, J. Stock (1994)
Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak InstrumentsEconometrics eJournal
L. Gómez‐Mejía, Marianna Makri, Martín Kintana (2010)
Diversification Decisions in Family-Controlled FirmsERN: Governance & Ownership (Topic)
J. O’Brien (2003)
The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovationSouthern Medical Journal, 24
L. Gómez‐Mejía, Katalin Haynes, Manuel Núñez-Nickel, Kathy Jacobson, José Moyano-Fuentes (2007)
Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil MillsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 52
M. Hannan, L. Burstein (1974)
Estimation from Grouped ObservationsAmerican Sociological Review, 39
Wei-Ru Chen, Kent Miller (2007)
Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensitySouthern Medical Journal, 28
W. Dyer, D. Whetten (2006)
Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30
W. Schulze, M. Lubatkin, Richard Dino (2003)
Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firmsJournal of Business Venturing, 18
R. Hoskisson, M. Hitt, Richard Johnson, W. Grossman (2002)
Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation StrategiesAcademy of Management Journal, 45
M. Useem (1996)
Investor Capitalism : How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America
Samuel Graves, S. Waddock (1990)
Institutional ownership and control: implications for long-term corporate strategyThe Executive, 4
P. Aghion, John Van, Reenen Zingales, Timothy Besley, P. Bolton, Florian Ederer, O. Hart, Mark Saunders, D. Scharfstein, J. Tirole
Nber Working Paper Series Innovation and Institutional Ownership
Steen Thomsen, Torben Pedersen (2000)
Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest european companiesStrategic Management Journal, 21
Carla Jones, Marianna Makri, L. Gómez‐Mejía (2008)
Affiliate Directors and Perceived Risk Bearing in Publicly Traded, Family–Controlled Firms: The Case of DiversificationEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32
Jeffrey Woodbridge (2002)
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
(2008)
Moving closer to the action: Examining compensation design effects on firm risk
E. Johnsen (1964)
Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s.Ledelse and Erhvervsøkonomi, 28
Marianna Makri is an Associate Professor at the University of Miami, School of Business Administration
Jaume Villanueva, H. Sapienza (2009)
Goal Tolerance, outside Investors, and Family Firm GovernanceEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33
L. Bargeron, K. Lehn, C. Zutter (2008)
Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Risk-TakingAmerican Finance Association Meetings (AFA)
Eric Gedajlovic, D. Shapiro (1998)
Management and ownership effects: evidence from five countriesStrategic Management Journal, 19
Scott Geiger, Marianna Makri (2006)
Exploration and exploitation innovation processes : The role of organizational slack in R & D intensive firms.The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17
J. Uotila, Markku Maula, T. Keil, S. Zahra (2009)
Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporationsSouthern Medical Journal, 30
R. Kochhar, Parthiban David (1996)
Institutional investors and firm innovation : a test of competing hypothesesStrategic Management Journal, 17
Jeffrey Sugheir, Phillip Phan, I. Hasan (2012)
Diversification and Innovation Revisited: An Absorptive Capacity View of Technological Knowledge CreationIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59
Dan Li, Lorraine Eden, M. Hitt, R. Ireland (2008)
Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers? Partner Selection in R&D AlliancesAcademy of Management Journal, 51
Richard Johnson, D. Greening (1999)
The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 42
Daniel Mcconaughy, C. Matthews, A. Fialko (2001)
Founding Family Controlled Firms: Performance, Risk, and ValueJournal of Small Business Management, 39
Hoskisson is George R. Brown Professor of Management at the Rice University
Moses Acquaah (2012)
Social networking relationships, firm‐specific managerial experience and firm performance in a transition economy: A comparative analysis of family owned and nonfamily firmsSouthern Medical Journal, 33
María García‐Vega (2006)
Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firmsResearch Policy, 35
C. Daily, Marc Dollinger (1993)
Alternative Methodologies for Identifying Family- versus Nonfamily-Managed BusinessesJournal of Small Business Management, 31
T. Daim, D. Kocaoglu, T. Anderson (2010)
Exploring Technological InnovationThe Journal of High Technology Management Research, 21
(2006)
The Corporate Library’s
M. Allen, Sharon Panian (1982)
Power, Performance, and Succession in the Large CorporationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 27
S. Jackson, Aparna Joshi (2011)
Work team diversity.
David Sirmon, J. Arrégle, M. Hitt, Justin Webb (2008)
The Role of Family Influence in Firms’ Strategic Responses to Threat of ImitationEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32
H. Greve (2003)
A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from ShipbuildingAcademy of Management Journal, 46
Ronald Anderson, D. Reeb (2003)
Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500Journal of Finance, 58
Ronald Anderson, D. Reeb (2003)
Founding‐Family Ownership, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Leverage*The Journal of Law and Economics, 46
Gavin Wright (1982)
An evolutionary theory of economic changeTechnology in Society, 4
Elizabeth Lim, Shobha Das, Amit Das (2009)
Diversification strategy, capital structure, and the Asian financial crisis (1997–1998): evidence from Singapore firms†Southern Medical Journal, 30
P. Berrone, C. Cruz, L. Gómez‐Mejía, Martín Larraza-Kintana (2010)
Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55
C. Mishra, Daniel Mcconaughy (1999)
Founding Family Control and Capital Structure: The Risk of Loss of Control and the Aversion to DebtEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23
J. Block (2012)
R&D Investments in Family and Founder Firms: An Agency PerspectiveSEIN Corporate Governance & Accountability eJournal
B. Baysinger, R. Hoskisson (1989)
Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity in Multiproduct FirmsAcademy of Management Journal, 32
C. Hill, R. Hoskisson (1987)
Strategy and Structure in the Multiproduct FirmAcademy of Management Review, 12
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of the Firm
A. Sundaram, Teresa John, Kose John (1996)
An empirical analysis of strategic competition and firm values The case of R&D competitionJournal of Financial Economics, 40
D. Dalton, C. Daily, S. Certo, Rungpen Roengpitya (2003)
Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion?Academy of Management Journal, 46
Nilanjan Basu, Lora Dimitrova, Imants Paeglis (2009)
Family control and dilution in mergersJournal of Banking and Finance, 33
James Brown, Bruce Petersen (2010)
Cash Holdings and R&D SmoothingCorporate Finance: Valuation
R. Hoskisson, M. Hitt, Richard Johnson, Douglas Moesel (1993)
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF AN OBJECTIVE (ENTROPY) CATEGORICAL MEASURE OF DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGYSouthern Medical Journal, 14
L. Gómez‐Mejía, Martín Larraza-Kintana, Marianna Makri (2003)
The Determinants of Executive Compensation in Family-Controlled Public CorporationsAcademy of Management Journal, 46
Michael Smith (1996)
Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors: Evidence from CalPERSJournal of Finance, 51
J. García-Manjón, M. Romero‐Merino (2012)
Research, development, and firm growth. Empirical evidence from European top R&D spending firmsResearch Policy, 41
S. Menard (1996)
Applied Logistic Regression Analysis
R. Rumelt (1974)
Strategy, structure, and economic performance
Sirmon is Associate Professor of Management and the Robert Herbold Professor in Entrepreneurship at the University of Washington
Fernando Muñoz‐Bullón, Maria Sanchez‐Bueno (2011)
The Impact of Family Involvement on the R&D Intensity of Publicly Traded FirmsFamily Business Review, 24
(2007)
Stata 10: Complete documentation
Naveen Daniel, J. Coles, L. Naveen (2006)
Managerial Incentives and Risk-TakingDrexel University LeBow College of Business Research Paper Series
胡盛昌, 干胜道 (2012)
《The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior》述评
Stuart Gillan, L. Starks (2000)
Corporate Governance Proposals and Shareholder Activism: The Role of Institutional InvestorsJournal of Financial Economics, 57
O. Granstrand (1998)
Towards a theory of the technology-based firm 1 Paper originally presented at the workshop on `TechnResearch Policy
H. Demsetz, K. Lehn (1985)
The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and ConsequencesJournal of Political Economy, 93
David Sirmon, M. Hitt (2003)
Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family FirmsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27
D. Balkin, G. Markman, L. Gómez‐Mejía (2000)
IS CEO PAY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY FIRMS RELATED TO INNOVATION?Academy of Management Journal, 43
Gomez-Mejia is Ray and Millann Siegfried Professor of Management at Mendoza College of Business
Theoretical explanations for family firm underinvestment in R&D relative to nonfamily firms remain nascent. We revisit this question using a refinement to the behavioral agency model (BAM)—the mixed gamble—that allows us to examine the socioemotional trade–offs that R&D represents for the family firm and how this differentiates their R&D investment decision from nonfamily firms. We do so in an empirical context where R&D investment is of greatest importance—high–technology industries. Moreover, we examine three contingencies that allow us to explore heterogeneity across family firms in their R&D decisions due to their effect upon the family's socioemotional wealth mixed gamble: institutional investor ownership, related diversification, and performance hazard.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice – SAGE
Published: Nov 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.