Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/enhancing-participation-in-probability-based-online-panels-two-ctANhlcueD
References (69)
-
Peter Lynn (2020)
Evaluating push-to-web methodology for mixed-mode surveys using address-based samplesSurvey research methods, 14
-
(2015)
Postal recruitment to a probability based web panel: Long term consequences for response rates, representativeness and costs -
A. Ette, Nils Witte (2021)
Brain Drain or Brain Circulation? Economic and Non-Economic Factors Driving the International Migration of German CitizensIMISCOE Research Series
-
C. Disogra, Mario Callegaro (2016)
Metrics and Design Tool for Building and Evaluating Probability-Based Online PanelsSocial Science Computer Review, 34
-
(2013)
Experimental evidence of the effect of monetary incentives on cross-sectional and longitudinal response: Experiences from the socioeconomic panel (SOEP) (SOEP papers on -
R. Becker, Sara Möser, D. Glauser (2019)
Cash vs. vouchers vs. gifts in web surveys of a mature panel study--Main effects in a long-term incentives experiment across three panel waves.Social science research, 81
-
Peter Lynn (2017)
From Standardised to Targeted Survey Procedures for Tackling Non-Response and AttritionSurvey research methods, 11
-
Jette Schröder ([email protected]) is a senior researcher at GESIS -Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences in -
R. Pandita (2017)
Internet a change agent: An overview of internet penetration and growth across the worldInternational Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 7
-
Erica Ryu, M. Couper, R. Marans (2006)
Survey Incentives: Cash vs. In-Kind; Face-to-Face vs. Mail; Response Rate vs. Nonresponse ErrorInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18
-
Edward McCaffery (1994)
Why People Play Lotteries and Why It MattersMicroeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty eJournal
-
Vidal Igúzquiza (2016)
Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method -
Chris Coryn, L. Becho, Carl Westine, P. Mateu, Ruqayyah Abu-Obaid, Kristin Hobson, Daniela Schröter, Erica Dodds, Anne Vo, Mary Ramlow (2020)
Material Incentives and Other Potential Factors Associated With Response Rates to Internet Surveys of American Evaluation Association Members: Findings From a Randomized ExperimentAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 41
-
Jens Beckert, M. Lutter (2013)
Why the Poor Play the Lottery: Sociological Approaches to Explaining Class-based Lottery PlaySociology, 47
-
(2017)
The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the Web in mixed-mode surveys -
(2002)
ALWAYS RELUCTANT ? EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL INCENTIVES ON LATER SURVEY PARTICIPATION IN A LONGITUDINAL STUDY -
P. Fishburn (1981)
Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theoriesTheory and Decision, 13
-
German emigration and remigration panel study : Methodology and data manual of the baseline survey ( Wave 1 ) -
A. Gouldner (1960)
THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT *American Sociological Review, 25
-
A. Gajić, David Cameron, J. Hurley (2012)
The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community surveyThe European Journal of Health Economics, 13
-
R. Münnich (2008)
Sampling AlgorithmsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 103
-
(2019)
Which incentive works best? Findings from a push-to-web experiment in the GGP context in Germany -
E. Singer, C. Ye (2013)
The Use and Effects of Incentives in SurveysThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645
-
(2006)
Introduction to the economics of altruism, giving and reciprocity -
A. Genoni, Jean Décieux, A. Ette, Nils Witte (2021)
Setting up Probability-Based Online Panels of Migrants with a Push-to-Web Approach: Lessons Learned from the German Emigration and Remigration Panel Study (GERPS)IMISCOE Research Series
-
He studies the consequences of international migration in the life course as well as in organizational contexts with a special focus on related survey design approaches -
(2019)
Does the mode matter? An experimental comparison of survey responses between face-to-face and mixed-mode surveys. ESRA, Zagreb -
Mario Callegaro, Reg Baker, J. Bethlehem, A. Göritz, J. Krosnick, P. Lavrakas (2014)
Online panel research: History, concepts, applications and a look at the future -
R. Becker, G. Mehlkop (2011)
Effects of Prepaid Monetary Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates and on Self-reporting about Delinquency - Empirical findingsBulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 111
-
Nils Witte, Reinhard Pollak, A. Ette (2021)
Social Origins of German Emigrants: Maintaining Social Status Through International Mobility?IMISCOE Research Series
-
M. Bošnjak, Tracy Tuten (2003)
Prepaid and Promised Incentives in Web SurveysSocial Science Computer Review, 21
-
M. Bošnjak, B. Batinic (2002)
Understanding the Willingness to Participate in Online-Surveys -
P. Edwards, R. Cooper, I. Roberts, C. Frost (2005)
Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnairesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59
-
S. Okasha (2007)
Rational Choice, Risk Aversion, and EvolutionThe Journal of Philosophy, 104
-
J. Raymer, A. Rogers (2007)
Using age and spatial flow structures in the indirect estimation of migration streamsDemography, 44
-
(1993)
The utitlity of gambling -
H. Best, C. Wolf (2014)
The Sage handbook of regression analysis and causal inference -
Sara Kretschmer, Gerrit Müller (2017)
The Wave 6 NEPS Adult Study Incentive Experiment, 11
-
A. Scherpenzeel, V. Toepoel (2012)
Recruiting a Probability Sample for an Online Panel Effects of Contact Mode, Incentives, and InformationPublic Opinion Quarterly, 76
-
M. Bošnjak, M. Das, Peter Lynn (2016)
Methods for Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode PanelsSocial Science Computer Review, 34
-
Benjamin Messer, D. Dillman (2011)
Surveying the General Public over the Internet Using Address-Based Sampling and Mail Contact ProceduresPublic Opinion Quarterly, 75
-
M. Bošnjak, Tracy Tuten (2003)
Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys: an experimentSocial Science Computer Review, 21
-
Cynthia Feliciano (2020)
Immigrant Selectivity Effects on Health, Labor Market, and Educational OutcomesAnnual Review of Sociology
-
R. Groves, E. Singer, A. Corning (2000)
Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.Public opinion quarterly, 64 3
-
Ulrich Krieger (2018)
A penny for your thoughts - the use of cash incentives in face-to-face surveys -
Klaus Pforr, Michael Blohm, A. Blom, Barbara Erdel, Barbara Felderer, Mathis Fräßdorf, Kristin Hajek, Susanne Helmschrott, Corinna Kleinert, Achim Koch, Ulrich Krieger, M. Kroh, Silke Martin, Denise Sassenroth, C. Schmiedeberg, Eva‐Maria Trüdinger, Beatrice Rammstedt (2015)
Are Incentive Effects on Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Large-scale, Face-to-face Surveys Generalizable to Germany? Evidence from Ten ExperimentsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 79
-
T. Watt, O. Jillson (1964)
ON STANDARD DEFINITIONSArchives of Dermatology, 90
-
Andrew Mercer, Andrew Caporaso, D. Cantor, Reanne Townsend (2015)
How Much Gets You How Much? Monetary Incentives and Response Rates in Household SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 79
-
Weimiao Fan, Zheng Yan (2010)
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic reviewComput. Hum. Behav., 26
-
E. Singer (2011)
Toward a benefit-cost theory or survey participation: Evidence, further tests, and implicationsJournal of Official Statistics, 27
-
R. Schoeni, F. Stafford, K. Mcgonagle, Patricia Andreski (2013)
Response Rates in National Panel SurveysThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645
-
Jean Décieux, Alexandra Mergener (2021)
German Labor Emigration in Times of Technological Change: Occupational Characteristics and Geographical PatternsSustainability
-
A. Göritz, Susanne Luthe (2013)
Effects of Lotteries on Response Behavior in Online PanelsField Methods, 25
-
J. Sakshaug, Sebastian Hülle, A. Schmucker, S. Liebig (2019)
Panel Survey Recruitment with or Without Interviewers? Implications for Nonresponse, Panel Consent, and Total Recruitment BiasJournal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
-
Yimeng Guo, J. Kopec, J. Cibere, Linda Li, C. Goldsmith (2016)
Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment.American journal of public health, 106 8
-
R. Tortora (2000)
Sampling: Design and AnalysisJournal of Quality Technology, 32
-
Wouter Haan (1999)
BOUNDED RATIONALITY -
H. Oscarsson, Sofia Arkhede (2020)
Effects of Conditional Incentives on Response Rate, Non-Response Bias and Measurement Error in a High Response-Rate ContextInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research
-
Z. Suzer-Gurtekin, Mahmoud Elkasabi, Mingnan Liu, J. Lepkowski, R. Curtin, Rebecca McBee (2016)
Effect of a pre-paid incentive on response rates to an Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Web-Mail surveySurvey practice, 9
-
Ben Jann (2014)
Plotting Regression Coefficients and other EstimatesThe Stata Journal, 14
-
M. Pedersen, Christian Nielsen (2016)
Improving Survey Response Rates in Online PanelsSocial Science Computer Review, 34
-
K. Cook, E. Rice (2020)
Social Exchange TheoryThe Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology
-
A. Göritz (2008)
The Long-Term Effect of Material Incentives on Participation in Online PanelsField Methods, 20
-
A. Blom, Christina Gathmann, Ulrich Krieger (2015)
Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General PopulationField Methods, 27
-
(2021)
The Global Lives of German MigrantsIMISCOE Research Series
-
Mario Callegaro, C. Disogra (2008)
Computing Response Metrics for Online PanelsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 72
-
Catherine Dawson (2019)
Online panel researchA–Z of Digital Research Methods
-
Carina Cornesse, Barbara Felderer, Marina Fikel, Ulrich Krieger, A. Blom (2021)
Recruiting a Probability-Based Online Panel via Postal Mail: Experimental EvidenceSocial Science Computer Review, 40
-
Trenton Mize (2019)
Best Practices for Estimating, Interpreting, and Presenting Nonlinear Interaction EffectsSociological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © The Author(s) 2022
- ISSN
- 0894-4393
- eISSN
- 1552-8286
- DOI
- 10.1177/08944393211054939
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This article investigates how mail-based online panel recruitment can be facilitated through incentives. The analysis relies on two incentive experiments and their effects on panel recruitment, and the intermediate participation in the recruitment survey. The experiments were implemented in the context of the German Emigration and Remigration Panel Study and encompass two samples of randomly sampled persons. Tested incentives include a conditional lottery, conditional monetary incentives, and the combination of unconditional money-in-hand with conditional monetary incentives. For an encompassing evaluation of the link between incentives and panel recruitment, the article further assesses the incentives’ implications for demographic composition and panel recruitment unit costs. Multivariate analysis indicates that low combined incentives (€5/€5) or, where unconditional disbursement is unfeasible, high conditional incentives (€20) are most effective in enhancing panel participation. In terms of demographic bias, low combined incentives (€5/€5) and €10 conditional incentives are the favored options. The budget options from the perspective of panel recruitment include the lottery and the €10 conditional incentive which break-even at net sample sizes of 1000.
Journal
Social Science Computer Review – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: Probability-based panel recruitment; incentive experiment; combined incentives; mobile populations; prepaid cash; money-in-hand; generous lottery; recruitment costs; demographic bias