Strained Mercy: The Quality of Medical Care in Delhi
Strained Mercy: The Quality of Medical Care in Delhi
Das, Jishnu;Hammer, Jeffrey S.
2004-02-25 00:00:00
The quality of medical care is a potentially important determinant of health outcomes. Nevertheless, it remains an understudied area. The limited research that exists defines quality either on the basis of drug availability or facility characteristics, but little is known about how provider quality affects the provision of health care. We address this gap through a survey in Delhi with two related components. We evaluate “competence” (what providers know) through vignettes and practice (what providers do) through direct clinical observation. Overall quality, as measured by the competence necessary to recognize and handle common and dangerous conditions, is quite low albeit with tremendous variation. While there is some correlation with simple observed characteristics, there is still an enormous amount of variation within such categories. Further, even when providers know what to do they often don’t do it in practice. This appears to be true in both the public and private sectors but for very different, and systematic, reasons. In the public sector providers are more likely to commit errors of omission—exert less effort compared to their private counterparts. In the private sector providers are prone to errors of commission—they are more likely to behave according to the patient’s expectations resulting
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngPolicy Research Working PapersUnpaywallhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/unpaywall/strained-mercy-the-quality-of-medical-care-in-delhi-c01MN4Zf1N
Strained Mercy: The Quality of Medical Care in Delhi
The quality of medical care is a potentially important determinant of health outcomes. Nevertheless, it remains an understudied area. The limited research that exists defines quality either on the basis of drug availability or facility characteristics, but little is known about how provider quality affects the provision of health care. We address this gap through a survey in Delhi with two related components. We evaluate “competence” (what providers know) through vignettes and practice (what providers do) through direct clinical observation. Overall quality, as measured by the competence necessary to recognize and handle common and dangerous conditions, is quite low albeit with tremendous variation. While there is some correlation with simple observed characteristics, there is still an enormous amount of variation within such categories. Further, even when providers know what to do they often don’t do it in practice. This appears to be true in both the public and private sectors but for very different, and systematic, reasons. In the public sector providers are more likely to commit errors of omission—exert less effort compared to their private counterparts. In the private sector providers are prone to errors of commission—they are more likely to behave according to the patient’s expectations resulting
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.