Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Frankel, A. McGarr, J. Bicknell, J. Mori, L. Seeber, E. Cranswick (1990)
Attenuation of high‐frequency shear waves in the crust: Measurements from New York State, South Africa, and southern CaliforniaJournal of Geophysical Research, 95
D. Doornbos (1983)
Observable effects of the seismic absorption band in the EarthGeophysical Journal International, 75
I. Morozov (2008)
Geometrical attenuation, frequency dependence of Q, and the absorption band problemGeophysical Journal International, 175
R. Wu (1985)
Multiple scattering and energy transfer of seismic waves - separation of scattering effect from intrinsic attenuation - I. Theoretical modellingGeophysical Journal International, 82
K Fuchs, G Müller (1971)
Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observationsJ. R. Astronom. Soc., 23
(2007)
Geometric spreading
A. Lees, Z. Der, V. Cormier, M. Marshall, J. Burnetti (1986)
Frequency dependence of Q in the mantle underlying the shield areas of Eurasia, Part 11: analyses of long period dataGeophysical Journal International, 87
(1985)
Multiple scattering and energy transfer of seismic waves , separation of scattering effect from intrinsic attenuation
G. Fan, T. Lay (2003)
Strong Lg Attenuation in the Tibetan PlateauBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93
H. Sato, M. Fehler (2012)
Seismic Wave Propagation and Scattering in the Heterogeneous Earth
W. Futterman (1962)
Dispersive body wavesJournal of Geophysical Research, 67
(2005)
A scattering model for seismic attenuation and its global application, Phys. Earth
R. White (1992)
The accuracy of estimating Q from seismic dataGeophysics, 57
B. Gutenberg (1958)
Attenuation of seismic waves in the earth's mantleBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 48
Ľ., W.
Absorption Band Q Model for the Earth
R. E. Abercrombie (1998)
A summary of attenuation measurements from borehole recordings of earthquakes: the 10Pure Appl. Geoph., 153
D. Jackson, D. Anderson (1970)
Physical mechanisms of seismic‐wave attenuationReviews of Geophysics, 8
(1985)
Methodologies for estimating
S. Kinoshita (2008)
Deep-Borehole-Measured QP and QS Attenuation for Two Kanto Sediment Layer SitesBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98
A. Jin, K. Mayeda, D. Adams, K. Aki (1994)
Separation of intrinsic and scattering attenuation in southern California using TERRAscope dataJournal of Geophysical Research, 99
(1991)
Frequency dependence
Jiakang Xie (2007)
Pn Attenuation beneath the Tibetan PlateauBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97
S. Mukhopadhyay, J. Sharma, R. Massey, J. Kayal (2008)
Lapse-Time Dependence of Coda Q in the Source Region of the 1999 Chamoli EarthquakeBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98
(1985)
Multiple scattering and energy transfer of seismic waves, separation of scattering effect from intrinsic attenuation, Geophys
I. Morozov, C. Zhang, J. Duenow, E. Morozova, S. Smithson (2008)
Frequency Dependence of Coda Q, Part I: Numerical Modeling and Examples from Peaceful Nuclear ExplosionsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98
I. Morozov, S. Smithson (2000)
Coda of Long-Range Arrivals from Nuclear ExplosionsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90
A. Dainty (1981)
A scattering model to explain seismic Q observations in the lithosphere between 1 and 30 HzGeophysical Research Letters, 8
(2002)
Quantitative Seismology, Second Edition, University Science Books, Sausalito
Xiaoning Yang, T. Lay, Xiao-Bi Xie, M. Thorne (2007)
Geometric Spreading of Pn and Sn in a Spherical Earth ModelBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97
(1976)
Short-period P-wave
Dok, ANDERsox, AxD, B. ARCHAMBEAt
Attenuation of Seismic Energy in the Upper Mantle
E. Morozova, I. Morozov, S. Smithson, L. Solodilov (1999)
Heterogeneity of the uppermost mantle beneath Russian Eurasia from the ultra‐long‐range profile quartzJournal of Geophysical Research, 104
B. Mitchell (1991)
Frequency dependence of QLg and its relation to crustal anelasticity in the Basin and Range ProvinceGeophysical Research Letters, 18
Hsi-Ping Liu, D. Anderson, H. Kanamori (1976)
Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity; implications for seismology and mantle compositionGeophysical Journal International, 47
(1990)
Attenuation of high-frequency shear
Z. Der, W. Rivers, T. McElfresh, A. O'Donnell, P. Klouda, M. Marshall (1982)
Worldwide variations in the attenuative properties of the upper mantle as determined from spectral studies of short-period body wavesPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 30
I. Morozov (2009)
Reply to “Comment on `Thirty Years of Confusion around `Scattering Q'?'” by J. Xie and M. FehlerSeismological Research Letters, 80
Z. Der, A. Lees (1985)
Methodologies for estimating t*(f) from short‐period body waves and regional variations of t*(f) in the United StatesGeophysical Journal International, 82
R. Abercrombie (1998)
A Summary of Attenuation Measurements from Borehole Recordings of Earthquakes: The 10 Hz Transition Problempure and applied geophysics, 153
A. Frankel, R. Clayton (1986)
Finite difference simulations of seismic scattering: Implications for the propagation of short‐period seismic waves in the crust and models of crustal heterogeneityJournal of Geophysical Research, 91
K. Aki (1980)
Scattering and attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphereJournal of Geophysical Research, 85
L. Wennerberg, A. Frankel (1989)
On the similarity of theories of anelastic and scattering attenuationBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 79
Z. Der, T. McElfresh (1975)
Short-period P-wave attenuation along various paths in North America as determined from P-wave spectra of the SALMON nuclear explosionBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Z. Der, T. McElfresh (1980)
Time-domain methods, the values of t p * and t s * in the short-period band and regional variations of the same across the United StatesBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 70
(1980)
Time-domain methods, the values
T. Bourbie, O. Coussy, B. Zinszner, M. Junger (1988)
Acoustics of Porous Media
Lev Chernov, R. Silverman, Philip Morse (1961)
Wave Propagation in a Random MediumJournal of Applied Mechanics, 28
(1986)
lithosphere between 1 and 30 Hz, Geophys
Z. Der, A. Lees, V. Cormier, L. Anderson, J. Burnetti (1985)
Frequency dependence of q in the mantle underlying the shield areas of Eurasia. Final technical report, 15 November 1982-30 December 1984
(2008)
Frequency dependence of regional coda Q: Part I. Numerical modeling and an example from Peaceful Nuclear Explosions
I. Morozov (2009)
Thirty Years of Confusion around “Scattering Q”?Seismological Research Letters, 80
(1991)
Frequency dependence of Q Lg and its relation to crustal anelasticity in the Basin and Range Province
S Kinoshita (1994)
Frequency-dependent attenuation of shear waves in the crust of the southern Kanto areaJapan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84
S. Kinoshita (1994)
Frequency-dependent attenuation of shear waves in the crust of the southern Kanto area, JapanBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
K. Aki, B. Chouet (1975)
Origin of coda waves: Source, attenuation, and scattering effectsJournal of Geophysical Research, 80
D. Anderson, H. Kanamori, R. Hart, Hsi-Ping Liu (1977)
The Earth as a Seismic Absorption BandScience, 196
K. Fuchs, G. Müller (1971)
Computation of Synthetic Seismograms with the Reflectivity Method and Comparison with ObservationsGeophysical Journal International, 23
S. Padhy (2005)
A scattering model for seismic attenuation and its global applicationsPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 148
(1976)
Short-period P-wave attenuation
(1986)
Frequency dependence of Q in the mantle underlying the shield areas of Eurasia, Part II: analyses of long period data, Geophys
S. Karato, H. Spetzler (1990)
Defect microdynamics in minerals and solid state mechanisms of seismic wave attenuation and velocity dispersion in the mantleReviews of Geophysics, 28
U. Faul, J. Gerald, I. Jackson (2004)
Shear wave attenuation and dispersion in melt-bearing olivine polycrystals: 2. Microstructural interpretation and seismological implicationsJournal of Geophysical Research, 109
(2002)
Deep Seismic Sounding data sets for seismic
Variability of the Earth’s structure makes a first-order impact on attenuation measurements which often does not receive adequate attention. Geometrical spreading (GS) can be used as a simple measure of the effects of such structure. The traditional simplified GS compensation is insufficiently accurate for attenuation measurements, and the residual GS appears as biases in both Q 0 and η parameters in the frequency-dependent attenuation law Q(f) = Q 0 f η . A new interpretation approach bypassing Q(f) and using the attenuation coefficient χ(f) = γ + πf/Q e(f) resolves this problem by directly measuring the residual GS, denoted γ, and effective attenuation, Q e. The approach is illustrated by re-interpreting several published datasets, including nuclear-explosion and local-earthquake codas, Pn, and synthetic 50–300-s surface waves. Some of these examples were key to establishing the Q(f) concept. In all examples considered, χ(f) shows a linear dependence on the frequency, γ ≠ 0, and Q e can be considered frequency-independent. Short-period crustal body waves are characterized by positive γ SP values of (0.6–2.0) × 10−2 s−1 interpreted as related to the downward upper-crustal reflectivity. Long-period surface waves show negative γ LP ≈ −1.9 × 10−5 s−1, which could be caused by insufficient modeling accuracy at long periods. The above γ values also provide a simple explanation for the absorption band observed within the Earth. The band is interpreted as apparent and formed by levels of Q e ≈ 1,100 within the crust decreasing to Q e ≈ 120 within the uppermost mantle, with frequencies of its flanks corresponding to γ LP and γ SP. Therefore, the observed absorption band could be purely geometrical in nature, and relaxation or scattering models may not be necessary for explaining the observed apparent Q(f). Linearity of the attenuation coefficient suggests that at all periods, the attenuation of both Rayleigh and Love waves should be principally accumulated at the sub-crustal depths (~38–100 km).
Pure and Applied Geophysics – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 16, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.