Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Seaman, J. Millspaugh, B. Kernohan, Gary Brundige, K. Raedeke, Robert Gitzen (1999)
Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimatesJournal of Wildlife Management, 63
D. Maehr, E. Land, D. Shindle, O. Bass, T. Hoctor (2002)
Florida panther dispersal and conservationBiological Conservation, 106
E. Comiskey, Oron Jr, Louis Gross, Roy McBride, René Salinas (2002)
Panthers and Forests in South Florida: an Ecological PerspectiveConservation Ecology, 6
Jason Kindall, F. Manen (2007)
Identifying Habitat Linkages for American Black Bears in North Carolina, USA, 71
B. Dickson, J. Jenness, P. Beier (2005)
INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION, TOPOGRAPHY, AND ROADS ON COUGAR MOVEMENT IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, 69
J. Clark, J. Dunn, Kimberly Smith (1993)
A multivariate model of female black bear habitat use for a geographic information systemJournal of Wildlife Management, 57
H. Moldenke, John Davis (1943)
The natural features of southern Florida, especially the vegetation, and the Everglades
L. Cowardin, V. Carter, Francis Golet, E. Laroe (2017)
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States
R. Nowak, E. Walker (1968)
Walker's mammals of the world
Rebecca Meegan, D. Maehr (2002)
LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION AND REGIONAL PLANNING FOR THE FLORIDA PANTHER, 1
C. Thatcher, F. Manen, J. Clark (2006)
Identifying Suitable Sites for Florida Panther Reintroduction, 70
D. Lindley, Calyampudi Rao (1953)
Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research., 116
D. Maehr, R. Belden, E. Land, L. Wilkins (1990)
Food habits of panthers in southwest FloridaJournal of Wildlife Management, 54
D. Verbyla, J. Litvaitis (1989)
Resampling methods for evaluating classification accuracy of wildlife habitat modelsEnvironmental Management, 13
B. Worton (1989)
Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studiesEcology, 70
R. Belden, Bruce Hagedorn (1993)
Feasibility of Translocating Panthers into Northern FloridaJournal of Wildlife Management, 57
Stephen Humphrey, Melissa Foster (1995)
Use of Highway Underpasses by Florida Panthers and Other WildlifeWildlife Society Bulletin, 23
Asaf Tsoar, Omri Allouche, O. Steinitz, Dotan Rotem, R. Kadmon (2007)
A comparative evaluation of presence‐only methods for modelling species distributionDiversity and Distributions, 13
A. Hirzel, A. Hirzel, G. Lay, V. Helfer, C. Randin, A. Guisan (2006)
Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presencesEcological Modelling, 199
M. Janis, J. Clark (2002)
Responses of Florida panthers to recreational deer and hog huntingJournal of Wildlife Management, 66
Douglas Johnson (1980)
THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCEEcology, 61
Randy Kautz, R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, Jane Comiskey, Deborah Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root (2006)
How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida pantherBiological Conservation, 130
One of the goals of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) recovery plan is to expand panther range north of the Caloosahatchee River in central Florida. Our objective was to evaluate the potential of that region to support panthers. We used a geographic information system and the Mahalanobis distance statistic to develop a habitat model based on landscape characteristics associated with panther home ranges. We used cross-validation and an independent telemetry data set to test the habitat model. We also conducted a least-cost path analysis to identify potential habitat linkages and to provide a relative measure of connectivity among habitat patches. Variables in our model were paved road density, major highways, human population density, percentage of the area permanently or semipermanently flooded, and percentage of the area in natural land cover. Our model clearly identified habitat typical of that found within panther home ranges based on model testing with recent telemetry data. We identified 4 potential translocation sites that may support a total of approximately 36 panthers. Although we identified potential habitat linkages, our least-cost path analyses highlighted the extreme isolation of panther habitat in portions of the study area. Human intervention will likely be required if the goal is to establish female panthers north of the Caloosahatchee in the near term.
Journal of Mammalogy – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 14, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.