Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. L. (1934)
Collected PapersNature, 134
D. Adler, J. Kounin (1939)
Some Factors Operating at the Moment of Resumption of Interrupted TasksThe Journal of Psychology, 7
A. Marrow (1938)
Goal Tensions and Recall: IJournal of General Psychology, 19
T. Abel (1938)
Neurocirculatory Reaction and the Recall of Unfinished and Completed TasksThe Journal of Psychology, 6
S. Rosenzweig (1933)
Preferences in the Repetition of Successful and Unsuccessful Activities as a Function of Age and PersonalityJournal of Genetic Psychology, 42
S. Rosenzweig, Gwendolyn Mason (1934)
An experimental study of memory in relation to the theory of repression.The British journal of psychology. General section, 24
H. Lewis (1944)
An experimental study of the role of the ego in work. I. The role of the ego in coöperative work.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34
S. Rosenzweig (1943)
An experimental study of 'repression' with special reference to need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32
Twelve subjects in each of two groups in experiments I and IA were instructed so as to induce respectively task-oriented and ego-oriented attitudes in their performance of 18 assigned tasks (see ^W18:^n 2739). The ratio between the average number of interrupted to completed tasks was 1.74 and .625 for I and IA respectively. Thus, when the person is ego-oriented, recall favors the completed (ego-enhancing, "success') tasks. When the S worked jointly with another person (experiment II), the ratio of interrupted to completed tasks was 1.50, showing that interrupted tasks are better recalled in co-operative as well as in isolated work. In experiment III, 23 Ss working alone at the same tasks as above were interrupted by E who completed the task while S watched. The ratio of interrupted to completed tasks was 1.20, indicating that completion of a task by another person (objective completion) may be as satisfactory as personal completion, even when the person is working alone. This depends upon task-orientation and upon the nature of the task.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 1, 1944
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.