Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Influence of Purchase Price and Ownership Levels on Theft Targets

The Influence of Purchase Price and Ownership Levels on Theft Targets AbstractIn this paper, we use police recorded crime data and purchase price information to investigate patterns in property stolen during domestic burglaries. We test the hypotheses that frequently stolen items are ‘CRAVED’ (Clarke 1999) and that the levels at which items are stolen vary over time, according to a product’s position in the consumer goods life cycle of innovation, growth, mass market, saturation (Felson and Clarke 1998). We focus on audio–visual equipment and mobile telephones, comparing the trends with those for cash. The results show that the prevalence of theft of the products considered has changed significantly over the period studied, consistent with the life cycle hypothesis. The crime prevention implications of these findings are discussed and suggestions for further research considered. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The British Journal of Criminology Oxford University Press

The Influence of Purchase Price and Ownership Levels on Theft Targets

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/the-influence-of-purchase-price-and-ownership-levels-on-theft-targets-aOsZ9h8hJb

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
British Journal of Criminology © the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD) 2005; all rights reserved
ISSN
0007-0955
eISSN
1464-3529
DOI
10.1093/bjc/azi003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we use police recorded crime data and purchase price information to investigate patterns in property stolen during domestic burglaries. We test the hypotheses that frequently stolen items are ‘CRAVED’ (Clarke 1999) and that the levels at which items are stolen vary over time, according to a product’s position in the consumer goods life cycle of innovation, growth, mass market, saturation (Felson and Clarke 1998). We focus on audio–visual equipment and mobile telephones, comparing the trends with those for cash. The results show that the prevalence of theft of the products considered has changed significantly over the period studied, consistent with the life cycle hypothesis. The crime prevention implications of these findings are discussed and suggestions for further research considered.

Journal

The British Journal of CriminologyOxford University Press

Published: Sep 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.