Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Eaves, N. Martin, J. Jinks (1977)
A progressive approach to non‐additivity and genotype‐environmental covariance in the analysis of human differencesBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30
P. Mehta, M. Neale, B. Flay (2004)
Squeezing interval change from ordinal panel data: latent growth curves with ordinal outcomes.Psychological methods, 9 3
N. Mello, G. Burghardt (2004)
Squeezing Interval Change From Ordinal Panel Data : Latent Growth Curves With Ordinal Outcomes
S. Purcell (2002)
Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis.Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 5 6
M. Neale, L. Eaves, K. Kendler (1994)
The power of the classical twin study to resolve variation in threshold traitsBehavior Genetics, 24
L. Aiken, S. West (1991)
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
D. Boomsma, E. Someren, A. Beem, E. Geus, G. Willemsen (2008)
Sleep During a Regular Week Night: A Twin-Sibling StudyTwin Research and Human Genetics, 11
S. Purcell (2002)
Variance Components Models for Gene–Environment Interaction in Twin AnalysisTwin Research, 5
M. Neale, L. Cardon (1992)
Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families
K. Mather, J. Jinks (1977)
Introduction to biometrical genetics
(2009)
Behav Genet
Following the publication of Purcell’s approach to the modeling of gene by environment interaction in 2002, the interest in G × E modeling in twin and family data increased dramatically. The analytic techniques described by Purcell were designed for use with continuous data. Here we explore the re-parameterization of these models for use with ordinal and binary outcome data. Analysis of binary and ordinal data within the context of a liability threshold model traditionally requires constraining the total variance to unity to ensure identification. Here, we demonstrate an alternative approach for use with ordinal data, in which the values of the first two thresholds are fixed, thus allowing the total variance to change as function of the moderator. We also demonstrate that when using binary data, constraining the total variance to unity for a given value of the moderator is sufficient to ensure identification. Simulation results indicate that analyses of ordinal and binary data can recover both the raw and standardized patterns of results. However, the scale of the results is dependent on the specification of (threshold or variance) constraints rather than the underlying distribution of liability. Example Mx scripts are provided.
Behavior Genetics – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 14, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.