Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dialogue With Bjørn Gustavsen's Article

Dialogue With Bjørn Gustavsen's Article With Dialogue Gustavsen’s Article Bjørn Gustavsen some of the set out amplifies Bjorn principles by previous authors and shows how can be in action research in they applied practical His contribution work three others, organizations. explores, among major the of size How can we issues: interventions to (i.e., question design inquiry have a the achievement of and the significant impact?), practical objectives, of effective democratic development dialogue. with the of the critical mass of His concern interventions echoes question that we will if Heron’s admonition learn more we the John place practical to rather first-to work than create actually change organizations experi- ments that we will have a wider influence later. It also reminds us of hope of rhizomatic that Patti Lather’s notion a criterion of (Lather, 1993): validity is that ideas and are so that quality changes designed they self-propagate elsewhere. And his concern with the and the links practical pragmatic with Tom Schwandt’s that we must move formal strongly arguments beyond criteria of to a more validity practical reasoning. Because Gustavsen’s focus here is on the he that one practical, proposes criterion for the of the action research is whether or not judging quality were achieved. But http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Inquiry SAGE

Dialogue With Bjørn Gustavsen's Article

Lincoln, Yvonna S.; Reason, Peter
Qualitative Inquiry , Volume 2 (1): 2 – Mar 1, 1996
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/dialogue-with-bj-rn-gustavsen-s-article-ZkYXT0nbcc

References (2)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
1077-8004
eISSN
1552-7565
DOI
10.1177/107780049600200112
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

With Dialogue Gustavsen’s Article Bjørn Gustavsen some of the set out amplifies Bjorn principles by previous authors and shows how can be in action research in they applied practical His contribution work three others, organizations. explores, among major the of size How can we issues: interventions to (i.e., question design inquiry have a the achievement of and the significant impact?), practical objectives, of effective democratic development dialogue. with the of the critical mass of His concern interventions echoes question that we will if Heron’s admonition learn more we the John place practical to rather first-to work than create actually change organizations experi- ments that we will have a wider influence later. It also reminds us of hope of rhizomatic that Patti Lather’s notion a criterion of (Lather, 1993): validity is that ideas and are so that quality changes designed they self-propagate elsewhere. And his concern with the and the links practical pragmatic with Tom Schwandt’s that we must move formal strongly arguments beyond criteria of to a more validity practical reasoning. Because Gustavsen’s focus here is on the he that one practical, proposes criterion for the of the action research is whether or not judging quality were achieved. But

Journal

Qualitative Inquiry – SAGE

Published: Mar 1, 1996

There are no references for this article.