Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Institutionalizing Ethics on Corporate Boards*

Institutionalizing Ethics on Corporate Boards* INSTITUTIONALIZING ETHICS ON CORPORATE BOARDS* By THEODORE V. PURCELL, S. J.+* Georgetown University This paper does not primarily discuss ethics as applied to economics but rather ethics as a needed input into corporate decision-making. Economic thinking is already one component of such decisions, along with law, politics, technology, finance, and so forth. But our treatment should also have relevance for economic theory and research.' Why should managers explicitly ask ethical questions? The post- Nixon corporate Watergate, followed by sensational investigations of international payoffs, aroused unprecedented distrust of big business and further stimulated the so-called "ethical investor" movement. Therefore, it becomes plain good strategy for the firm and its individ- ual managers to be concerned with ethics, if for no other reason than "to keep the restless natives quiet." Of course there is a much deeper reason than that. Most people want and need to be ethical persons not only in private life, but also in business, where a manager's decisions may affect many thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of persons. Also, individuals normally want to be part of an organization whose purpose and activity they believe is beneficial to society. I. WHOSE ETHICS? One hears doubts raised about the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Social Economy Taylor & Francis

Institutionalizing Ethics on Corporate Boards*

Review of Social Economy , Volume 36 (1): 14 – Apr 1, 1978

Institutionalizing Ethics on Corporate Boards*

Review of Social Economy , Volume 36 (1): 14 – Apr 1, 1978

Abstract

INSTITUTIONALIZING ETHICS ON CORPORATE BOARDS* By THEODORE V. PURCELL, S. J.+* Georgetown University This paper does not primarily discuss ethics as applied to economics but rather ethics as a needed input into corporate decision-making. Economic thinking is already one component of such decisions, along with law, politics, technology, finance, and so forth. But our treatment should also have relevance for economic theory and research.' Why should managers explicitly ask ethical questions? The post- Nixon corporate Watergate, followed by sensational investigations of international payoffs, aroused unprecedented distrust of big business and further stimulated the so-called "ethical investor" movement. Therefore, it becomes plain good strategy for the firm and its individ- ual managers to be concerned with ethics, if for no other reason than "to keep the restless natives quiet." Of course there is a much deeper reason than that. Most people want and need to be ethical persons not only in private life, but also in business, where a manager's decisions may affect many thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of persons. Also, individuals normally want to be part of an organization whose purpose and activity they believe is beneficial to society. I. WHOSE ETHICS? One hears doubts raised about the

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/institutionalizing-ethics-on-corporate-boards-ZfS7JNEU76

References (8)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1470-1162
eISSN
0034-6764
DOI
10.1080/00346767800000003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

INSTITUTIONALIZING ETHICS ON CORPORATE BOARDS* By THEODORE V. PURCELL, S. J.+* Georgetown University This paper does not primarily discuss ethics as applied to economics but rather ethics as a needed input into corporate decision-making. Economic thinking is already one component of such decisions, along with law, politics, technology, finance, and so forth. But our treatment should also have relevance for economic theory and research.' Why should managers explicitly ask ethical questions? The post- Nixon corporate Watergate, followed by sensational investigations of international payoffs, aroused unprecedented distrust of big business and further stimulated the so-called "ethical investor" movement. Therefore, it becomes plain good strategy for the firm and its individ- ual managers to be concerned with ethics, if for no other reason than "to keep the restless natives quiet." Of course there is a much deeper reason than that. Most people want and need to be ethical persons not only in private life, but also in business, where a manager's decisions may affect many thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of persons. Also, individuals normally want to be part of an organization whose purpose and activity they believe is beneficial to society. I. WHOSE ETHICS? One hears doubts raised about the

Journal

Review of Social EconomyTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 1, 1978

There are no references for this article.