Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.

The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from... To assess the functional locus of visual-motor learning, the computational concepts of "task level" programming (determination of the trajectory of a hand during arm reaching in the Cartesian coordinates) and "manipulator level" programming (determination of the joint coordinates) was adopted. Because the former is likely to be hand nonspecific and the latter is hand specific, it is assumed that learning at the task level should be transferred to the unpracticed hand, whereas that at the manipulator level it should not. Under this assumption, the paradigm of intermanual transfer was used in an aiming task under rotated visual feedback. Nearly 100% intermanual transfer from the practiced hand to the unpracticed hand in the performance time of aiming was found, concluding that the locus of visual-motor learning should be at the task level rather than at the manipulator level. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance Pubmed

The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance , Volume 21 (4): 15 – Sep 21, 1995

The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.


Abstract

To assess the functional locus of visual-motor learning, the computational concepts of "task level" programming (determination of the trajectory of a hand during arm reaching in the Cartesian coordinates) and "manipulator level" programming (determination of the joint coordinates) was adopted. Because the former is likely to be hand nonspecific and the latter is hand specific, it is assumed that learning at the task level should be transferred to the unpracticed hand, whereas that at the manipulator level it should not. Under this assumption, the paradigm of intermanual transfer was used in an aiming task under rotated visual feedback. Nearly 100% intermanual transfer from the practiced hand to the unpracticed hand in the performance time of aiming was found, concluding that the locus of visual-motor learning should be at the task level rather than at the manipulator level.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/the-locus-of-visual-motor-learning-at-the-task-or-manipulator-level-YProUkzS1U

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0096-1523
DOI
10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.719
pmid
7643045

Abstract

To assess the functional locus of visual-motor learning, the computational concepts of "task level" programming (determination of the trajectory of a hand during arm reaching in the Cartesian coordinates) and "manipulator level" programming (determination of the joint coordinates) was adopted. Because the former is likely to be hand nonspecific and the latter is hand specific, it is assumed that learning at the task level should be transferred to the unpracticed hand, whereas that at the manipulator level it should not. Under this assumption, the paradigm of intermanual transfer was used in an aiming task under rotated visual feedback. Nearly 100% intermanual transfer from the practiced hand to the unpracticed hand in the performance time of aiming was found, concluding that the locus of visual-motor learning should be at the task level rather than at the manipulator level.

Journal

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performancePubmed

Published: Sep 21, 1995

There are no references for this article.