Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

‘Can you pass the salt?’ The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech

‘Can you pass the salt?’ The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech This article introduces the concept of indirect speech and shows what it can contribute to understanding ‘legitimacy talk’ regarding international institutions. Indirect speech occurs when one kind of illocutionary act is used to communicate another. Examples include euphemism, some forms of politeness and when a request is expressed as a question (‘Can you pass the salt?’). Transporting concepts from pragmatics and sociolinguistics, this article argues that legitimacy talk often serves this function in international politics, operating by expressing specific requests in the form of more generalized legitimacy claims. Understanding this double role of legitimacy talk sheds light on otherwise puzzling empirical phenomena, such as why states frame their demands in terms of legitimacy when they are transparently self-serving, why states with different interests can nonetheless express their demands in the same terms, and why they persist in doing so long after there is any realistic hope of being ‘persuasive’. An analysis of the debate on Security Council reform illustrates the benefits of this approach for the study of international relations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of International Relations SAGE

‘Can you pass the salt?’ The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech

Download PDF
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/can-you-pass-the-salt-the-legitimacy-of-international-institutions-and-Xhg9YK6NH7

References (113)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2015
ISSN
1354-0661
eISSN
1460-3713
DOI
10.1177/1354066114563417
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of indirect speech and shows what it can contribute to understanding ‘legitimacy talk’ regarding international institutions. Indirect speech occurs when one kind of illocutionary act is used to communicate another. Examples include euphemism, some forms of politeness and when a request is expressed as a question (‘Can you pass the salt?’). Transporting concepts from pragmatics and sociolinguistics, this article argues that legitimacy talk often serves this function in international politics, operating by expressing specific requests in the form of more generalized legitimacy claims. Understanding this double role of legitimacy talk sheds light on otherwise puzzling empirical phenomena, such as why states frame their demands in terms of legitimacy when they are transparently self-serving, why states with different interests can nonetheless express their demands in the same terms, and why they persist in doing so long after there is any realistic hope of being ‘persuasive’. An analysis of the debate on Security Council reform illustrates the benefits of this approach for the study of international relations.

Journal

European Journal of International Relations – SAGE

Published: Dec 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.