Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Ruta, A. Garratt, M. Leng, I. Russell, Lesley MacDonald (1994)
A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient‐Generated IndexMedical Care, 32
G. Waddell, C. Main (1984)
Assessment of Severity in Low‐Back DisordersSpine, 9
M. Grönblad, M. Hupli, Pekka Wennerstrand, Erkki Järvinen, A. Lukinmaa, J. Kouri, E. Karaharju (1993)
Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients.The Clinical journal of pain, 9 3
A. Järvikoski, G. Mellin, A. Estlander, K. Härkäpää, H. Vanharanta, M. Hupli, R. Heinonen (1993)
Outcome of two multimodal back treatment programs with and without intensive physical training.Journal of spinal disorders, 6 2
J. Keats (1957)
Estimation of error variances of test scoresPsychometrika, 22
P. Stratford, J. Binkley, P. Solomon, C. Gill, E. Finch (1994)
Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain.Physical therapy, 74 6
Edith Herman, Renee Williams, P. Stratford, A. Fargas-Babjak, Maria Trott (1994)
A randomized controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (CODETRON) to determine its benefits in a rehabilitation program for acute occupational low back pain.Spine, 19 5
Aila rvikoski, G. Mellin, Estlander Am, Kristiina p, H. Vanharanta, M. Hupli, R. Heinonen (1993)
Outcome of Two Multimodal Back Treatment Programs With and Without Intensive Physical TrainingJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 6
M. Roland, R. Morris (1983)
A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care.Spine, 8 2
Roman Jaeschke, J. Singer, G. Guyatt (1989)
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.Controlled clinical trials, 10 4
R. Deyo (1986)
Comparative Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile and Shorter Scales for Functional Assessment in Low-Back PainSpine, 11
M. Bergner, R. Bobbitt, W. Carter, B. Gilson (1981)
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status MeasureMedical Care, 19
D. Ruta, A. Garratt, D. Wardlaw, I. Russell (1994)
Developing a Valid and Reliable Measure of Health Outcome for Patients With Low Back PainSpine, 19
H. Weber, I. Holme, E. Amlie (1993)
The natural course of acute sciatica with nerve root symptoms in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of piroxicam.Spine, 18 11
M. Roland, R. Morris (1983)
A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.Spine, 8 2
K. Ottenbacher, M. Johnson, M. Hojem (1988)
The significance of clinical change and clinical change of significance: issues and methods.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 42 3
L. Feldt, M. Steffen, N. Gupta (1985)
A Comparison of Five Methods for Estimating the Standard Error of Measurement at Specific Score LevelsApplied Psychological Measurement, 9
J. Kopec, J. Esdaile, M. Abrahamowicz, L. Abenhaim, S. Wood-Dauphinee, D. Lamping, Jack Williams (1995)
The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Measurement PropertiesSpine, 20
E. Juniper, G. Guyatt, A. Willan, L. Griffith (1994)
Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 47 1
J. Ware, C. Sherbourne (1992)
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
J. Fairbank, J. Couper, Davies Jb, O'Brien Jp (1980)
The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.Physiotherapy, 66 8
Hsieh Cy, Phillips Rb, Adams Ah, Pope Mh (1992)
Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 15
R. Deyo, R. Deyo, R. Centor, R. Centor (1986)
Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.Journal of chronic diseases, 39 11
Background and Purpose. The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale. The RMQ has been shown to yield reliable measurements, which are valid for inferring the level of disability, and to be sensitive to change over time for groups of patients with low back pain. Little is known about the usefulness of this instrument in aiding decision making regarding individual patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum level of detectable change when the RMQ is applied to individual patients. Subjects. The study sample consisted of 60 outpatients with low back pain. Methods. The RMQ was administered at the subjects' initial visit and again 4 to 6 weeks later. Conditional standard errors of measurement (CSEMs) were computed for initial and follow-up RMQ scores, and these values were used to estimate the minimum level of detectable change. Results. Minimum levels of detectable change at the 90% confidence level varied from 4 to 5 RMQ points. Conclusion and Discussion. The magnitude of CSEMs is sufficiently small to detect change in patients with initial scores in the central portion of the scale (4–20 RMQ points); however, the magnitude is too large to detect improvement in patients with scores of less than 4 and deterioration in patients who have scores greater than 20.
Physical Therapy – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.