Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times

Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News... Intermedia agenda setting is a widely used theory to explain how content transfers between news media. The recent digitalization wave, however, challenges some of its basic presuppositions. We discuss three assumptions that cannot be applied to online and social media unconditionally: one, that media agendas should be measured on an issue level; two, that fixed time lags suffice to understand overlap in media content; and three, that media can be considered homogeneous entities. To address these challenges, we propose a “news story” approach as an alternative way of mapping how news spreads through the media. We compare this with a “traditional” analysis of time-series data. In addition, we differentiate between three groups of actors that use Twitter. For these purposes, we study online and offline media alike, applying both measurement methods to the 2014 Belgium election campaign. Overall, we find that online media outlets strongly affect other media that publish less often. Yet, our news story analysis emphasizes the need to look beyond publication schemes. “Slow” newspapers, for example, often precede other media’s coverage. Underlining the necessity to distinguish between Twitter users, we find that media actors on Twitter have vastly more agenda-setting influence than other actors do. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Press/Politics SAGE

Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/intermedia-agenda-setting-in-the-social-media-age-how-traditional-Xa6ZKqequV

References (43)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2017
ISSN
1940-1612
eISSN
1940-1620
DOI
10.1177/1940161217704969
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Intermedia agenda setting is a widely used theory to explain how content transfers between news media. The recent digitalization wave, however, challenges some of its basic presuppositions. We discuss three assumptions that cannot be applied to online and social media unconditionally: one, that media agendas should be measured on an issue level; two, that fixed time lags suffice to understand overlap in media content; and three, that media can be considered homogeneous entities. To address these challenges, we propose a “news story” approach as an alternative way of mapping how news spreads through the media. We compare this with a “traditional” analysis of time-series data. In addition, we differentiate between three groups of actors that use Twitter. For these purposes, we study online and offline media alike, applying both measurement methods to the 2014 Belgium election campaign. Overall, we find that online media outlets strongly affect other media that publish less often. Yet, our news story analysis emphasizes the need to look beyond publication schemes. “Slow” newspapers, for example, often precede other media’s coverage. Underlining the necessity to distinguish between Twitter users, we find that media actors on Twitter have vastly more agenda-setting influence than other actors do.

Journal

The International Journal of Press/PoliticsSAGE

Published: Jul 1, 2017

Keywords: journalism; intermedia agenda setting; social media; Twitter; Internet

There are no references for this article.