Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Splenomegaly—an insensitive sign of portal hypertension

Splenomegaly—an insensitive sign of portal hypertension The prevalence of splenomegaly associated with portal hypertension was examined in a consecutive population of III patients who had portal hypertension diagnosed using specific endoscopie, sonographic, and Doppler signs. Splenic size was measured objectively via its cranio‐caudal length on coronal section using ultrasound and by clinical examination. Sonographically, 52% of patients had a definitely large spleen and 35% a spleen less than one standard deviation from the normal mean, while a further 13% had equivocal splenomegaly. Only 52% of patients had splenomegaly on clinical assessment. Splenomegaly was less common in patients with alcoholic (41% definite, 15% equivocal) than in those with non‐alcoholic liver disease (66% definite, 17% equivocal, p= 0.02) and splenic length was significantly smaller in alcoholic patients (12.7±0.5cm) compared to patients with either non‐alcoholic liver disease (15.0±0.6cm, p= 0.003) or portal hypertension due to vascular occlusive diseases (16.5 ± 2.0 cm, p= 0.006). Splenomegaly, whether assessed sonographically or clinically, is an insensitive sign of portal hypertension and its absence cannot be used as a negative predictor of the presence of portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Internal Medicine Journal Wiley

Splenomegaly—an insensitive sign of portal hypertension

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/splenomegaly-an-insensitive-sign-of-portal-hypertension-XTg04ubFCT

References (11)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1444-0903
eISSN
1445-5994
DOI
10.1111/j.1445-5994.1990.tb00421.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The prevalence of splenomegaly associated with portal hypertension was examined in a consecutive population of III patients who had portal hypertension diagnosed using specific endoscopie, sonographic, and Doppler signs. Splenic size was measured objectively via its cranio‐caudal length on coronal section using ultrasound and by clinical examination. Sonographically, 52% of patients had a definitely large spleen and 35% a spleen less than one standard deviation from the normal mean, while a further 13% had equivocal splenomegaly. Only 52% of patients had splenomegaly on clinical assessment. Splenomegaly was less common in patients with alcoholic (41% definite, 15% equivocal) than in those with non‐alcoholic liver disease (66% definite, 17% equivocal, p= 0.02) and splenic length was significantly smaller in alcoholic patients (12.7±0.5cm) compared to patients with either non‐alcoholic liver disease (15.0±0.6cm, p= 0.003) or portal hypertension due to vascular occlusive diseases (16.5 ± 2.0 cm, p= 0.006). Splenomegaly, whether assessed sonographically or clinically, is an insensitive sign of portal hypertension and its absence cannot be used as a negative predictor of the presence of portal hypertension in patients with chronic liver disease.

Journal

Internal Medicine JournalWiley

Published: Dec 1, 1990

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.