Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Stephens (2000)
Dealing with label switching in mixture modelsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62
K. Nylund, T. Asparouhov, B. Muthén (2007)
Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation StudyStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14
S. Depaoli (2014)
The Impact of Inaccurate “Informative” Priors for Growth Parameters in Bayesian Growth Mixture ModelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21
P. Deb (2008)
Finite Mixture Models
C. Schaeffer, H. Petras, N. Ialongo, Katherine Masyn, Scott Hubbard, Jeanne Poduska, S. Kellam (2006)
A comparison of girls' and boys' aggressive-disruptive behavior trajectories across elementary school: prediction to young adult antisocial outcomes.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 74 3
S. Frühwirth-Schnatter (2001)
Markov chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Classical and Dynamic Switching and Mixture ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 96
G. Freytag (1964)
[CORRELATION AND CAUSALITY].Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie, 16
W. Gilks, S. Richardson, D. Spiegelhalter (1997)
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in PracticeTechnometrics, 39
S. Richardson, P. Green, Christian Robert, M. Aitkin, David Cox, Matthew Stephens, A. Polymenis, W. Gilks, A. Nobile, M. Hodgson, Anthony O'Hagan, N. Longford, A. Dawid, Anthony Atkinson, J. Bernardo, J. Besag, Stephen Brooks, S. Byers, A. Raftery, G. Celeux, R. Cheng, W. Liu, Yung-Hsin Chien, Edward George, N. Cressie, H.-C. Huang, M. Gruet, S. Heath, C. Jennison, Andrew Lawson, Allan Clark, Geoffrey McLachlan, D. Peel, K. Mengersen, A. George, Anne Philippe, Kathryn Roeder, Larry Wasserman, Peter Schlattmann, D. Böhning, D. Titterington, H. Tong, M. West (1997)
On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components. Discussion. Author's replyJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 59
Stephen Tueller, G. Lubke (2010)
Evaluation of Structural Equation Mixture Models: Parameter Estimates and Correct Class AssignmentStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17
D. Nagin (1999)
Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approachPsychological Methods, 4
A. O’Hagan (1998)
Eliciting expert beliefs in substantial practical applicationsThe Statistician, 47
Daniel Bauer, P. Curran (2003)
Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes.Psychological methods, 8 3
K. Samuelsen, G. Hancock (2007)
Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models
R. Gueorguieva, C. Mallinckrodt, J. Krystal (2011)
Trajectories of depression severity in clinical trials of duloxetine: insights into antidepressant and placebo responses.Archives of general psychiatry, 68 12
(1992)
Non-informative priors (with discussion)
A. Morin, C. Maïano, B. Nagengast, H. Marsh, Julien Morizot, M. Janosz (2011)
General Growth Mixture Analysis of Adolescents' Developmental Trajectories of Anxiety: The Impact of Untested Invariance Assumptions on Substantive InterpretationsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18
James Henson, S. Reise, Kevin Kim (2007)
Detecting Mixtures From Structural Model Differences Using Latent Variable Mixture Modeling: A Comparison of Relative Model Fit StatisticsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14
P. Lambert, A. Sutton, P. Burton, K. Abrams, David Jones (2005)
How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGSStatistics in Medicine, 24
A. Tolvanen (2007)
Latent growth mixture modeling : a simulation study
R. Kass, L. Wasserman (1996)
The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal RulesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 91
W. Gilks, S. Richardson, D. Spiegelhalter (1995)
Inference and monitoring convergence
A. Gelman, D. Rubin (2008)
A Single Series from the Gibbs Sampler Provides a False Sense of Security *
William Darnieder (2011)
Bayesian Methods for Data-Dependent Priors
G. Celeux, M. Hurn, C. Robert (2000)
Computational and Inferential Difficulties with Mixture Posterior DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 95
David Farrar (2006)
Approaches to the Label-Switching Problem of Classification , Based on Partition-Space Relabeling and Label-Invariant Visualization
J. Berger (2006)
The case for objective Bayesian analysisBayesian Analysis, 1
Kamel Jedidi, Harsharanjeet Jagpal, W. DeSarbo (1997)
Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved HeterogeneityERN: Other Econometrics: Single Equation Models (Topic)
K. Bollen, P. Curran (2005)
Latent curve models: A structural equation perspectiveSociological Methods & Research, 39
J. Szapocznik, D. Feaster, V. Mitrani, G. Prado, L. Smith, Carleen Robinson-Batista, S. Schwartz, M. Mauer, Michael Robbins (2004)
Structural ecosystems therapy for HIV-seropositive African American women: effects on psychological distress, family hassles, and family support.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 72 2
B. Muthén (2003)
Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: comment on Bauer and Curran (2003).Psychological methods, 8 3
Snigdhansu Chatterjee (2008)
Structural Equation Modeling, A Bayesian ApproachTechnometrics, 50
Craig Enders, Davood Tofighi (2008)
The Impact of Misspecifying Class-Specific Residual Variances in Growth Mixture ModelsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15
B. Muthén, L. Muthén (2000)
Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 24 6
A. Gelman, D. Rubin (1992)
Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple SequencesStatistical Science, 7
Z. Zhang, Fumiaki Hamagami, Lijuan Wang, J. Nesselroade, Kevin Grimm (2007)
Bayesian analysis of longitudinal data using growth curve modelsInternational Journal of Behavioral Development, 31
S. Sinharay (2004)
Experiences With Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Assessment in Two Psychometric ExamplesJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29
J. Diebolt, C. Robert (1994)
Estimation of Finite Mixture Distributions Through Bayesian SamplingJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 56
T. Chung, S. Maisto, J. Cornelius, C. Martin (2004)
Adolescents' alcohol and drug use trajectories in the year following treatment.Journal of studies on alcohol, 65 1
W. Linden (2008)
Using Response Times for Item Selection in Adaptive TestingJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33
B. Muthén, K. Shedden (1999)
Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM AlgorithmBiometrics, 55
A. O’Hagan, C. Buck, A. Daneshkhah, J. Eiser, H. Paul, Garthwaite, D. Jenkinson, J. Oakley, T. Rakow (2006)
Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities
John Hipp, Daniel Bauer (2006)
Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models.Psychological methods, 11 1
B. Muthén, T. Asparouhov (2012)
Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory.Psychological methods, 17 3
The diagonal covariance matrix for the residuals was Diag[15
G. Lubke, B. Muthén (2007)
Performance of Factor Mixture Models as a Function of Model Size, Covariate Effects, and Class-Specific Parameters.Structural Equation Modeling, 14
Larry Wasserman (2000)
Asymptotic inference for mixture models by using data‐dependent priorsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62
J. Kruschke (2010)
Bayesian data analysis.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 1 5
S. Lipovetsky (2005)
Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel,Longitudinal, and Structural Equation ModelsTechnometrics, 47
B. Muthén (2004)
Latent Variable Analysis: Growth Mixture Modeling and Related Techniques for Longitudinal Data
Ming-Chung Yang, D. Dunson (2010)
Bayesian Semiparametric Structural Equation Models with Latent VariablesPsychometrika, 75
R. Natarajan, C. McCulloch (1998)
Gibbs Sampling with Diffuse Proper Priors: A Valid Approach to Data-Driven Inference?Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7
(1996)
Implementing MCMC
G. Lubke, B. Muthén (2005)
Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.Psychological methods, 10 1
M. Candel, B. Winkens (2003)
Performance of Empirical Bayes Estimators of Level-2 Random Parameters in Multilevel Analysis: A Monte Carlo Study for Longitudinal DesignsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28
D. Rindskopf (2003)
Mixture or homogeneous? Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003).Psychological methods, 8 3
K. Roeder, L. Wasserman (1997)
Practical Bayesian Density Estimation Using Mixtures of NormalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 92
(2012)
Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.)
(2010)
Bayesian Analysis Using Mplus
A. Jasra, C. Holmes, D. Stephens (2005)
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods and the Label Switching Problem in Bayesian Mixture ModelingStatistical Science, 20
L. Brown (2008)
In-season prediction of batting averages: A field test of empirical Bayes and Bayes methodologiesThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 2
Note. Diag ϭ diagonal
Daniel Bauer (2007)
Observations on the Use of Growth Mixture Models in Psychological ResearchMultivariate Behavioral Research, 42
Growth mixture modeling (GMM) represents a technique that is designed to capture change over time for unobserved subgroups (or latent classes) that exhibit qualitatively different patterns of growth. The aim of the current article was to explore the impact of latent class separation (i.e., how similar growth trajectories are across latent classes) on GMM performance. Several estimation conditions were compared: maximum likelihood via the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm and the Bayesian framework implementing diffuse priors, “accurate” informative priors, weakly informative priors, data-driven informative priors, priors reflecting partial-knowledge of parameters, and “inaccurate” (but informative) priors. The main goal was to provide insight about the optimal estimation condition under different degrees of latent class separation for GMM. Results indicated that optimal parameter recovery was obtained though the Bayesian approach using “accurate” informative priors, and partial-knowledge priors showed promise for the recovery of the growth trajectory parameters. Maximum likelihood and the remaining Bayesian estimation conditions yielded poor parameter recovery for the latent class proportions and the growth trajectories.
Psychological Methods – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 25, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.