Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Needle, D. Fisher, N. Weatherby, D. Chitwood, B. Brown, H. Cesari, R. Booth, Mark Williams, J. Watters, M. Andersen, M. Braunstein (1995)
Reliability of Self-Reported HIV Risk Behaviors of Drug UsersPsychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9
K. Bucholz, Lee Robins, J. Shayka, T. Przybeck, J. Helzer, Evelyn Goldring, Marjorie Klein, J. Greist, H. Erdman, Stacey Skare (1991)
Performance of two forms of a computer psychiatric screening interview: version I of the DISSI.Journal of psychiatric research, 25 3
L. Davis, N. Hoffmann, R. Morse, J. Luehr (1992)
Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS): the equivalence and validity of a computer-administered and an interviewer-administered format.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 16 2
R. Lucas, P. Mullin, C. Luna, D. McInroy (1977)
Psychiatrists and a Computer as Interrogators of Patients with Alcohol-Related Illnesses: A ComparisonBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 131
Steve Hasley (1995)
A Comparison of Computer‐Based and Personal Interviews for the Gynecologic History UpdateObstetrics & Gynecology, 85
Tracey Wilson, Jack DeHovitz (1997)
STDs, HIV, and crack cocaine: a review.AIDS patient care and STDs, 11 2
R. Booth, W. Wiebel (1992)
Effectiveness of Reducing Needle-Related Risks for HIV Through Indigenous Outreach to Injection Drug UsersAmerican Journal on Addictions, 1
B. Brown, George Beschner (1993)
Handbook on risk of AIDS : injection drug users and sexual partners
H. Skinner, B. Allen (1983)
Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 51 2
Leo Davis, Robert Morse (1991)
Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test: a comparison of conventional versus computer-administered formats.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 15 2
N. Weatherby, R. Needle, H. Cesari, R. Booth, C. Mccoy, J. Watters, Mark Williams, D. Chitwood (1994)
Validity of self-reported drug use among injection drug users and crack cocaine users recruited through street outreachEvaluation and Program Planning, 17
J. Watters, P. Biernacki (1989)
TARGETED SAMPLING: OPTIONS FOR THE STUDY OF HIDDEN POPULATIONSSocial Problems, 36
R. Booth, J. Watters, D. Chitwood (1993)
HIV risk-related sex behaviors among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack.American journal of public health, 83 8
D. Paperny (1997)
Computerized Health Assessment and Education for Adolescent HIV and STD Prevention in Health Care Settings and SchoolsHealth Education & Behavior, 24
Philip Spinhoven, M. Labbe, Rene Rombouts (1993)
Feasibility of computerized psychological testing with psychiatric outpatients.Journal of clinical psychology, 49 3
Karen Huang, John Watters, Patricia Case (1988)
Psychological assessment and AIDS research with intravenous drug users: challenges in measurement.Journal of psychoactive drugs, 20 2
D. Calsyn, A. Saxon, George Freeman, Stephen Whittaker (1992)
Ineffectiveness of AIDS education and HIV antibody testing in reducing high-risk behaviors among injection drug users.American journal of public health, 82 4
Steven Locke, H. Kowaloff, Robert Hoff, Charles Safran, Mark Popovsky, Deborah Cotton, Dianne Finkelstein, Peter Page, Warner Slack (1990)
Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission.JAMA, 268 10
S. Millstein (1987)
Acceptability and Reliability of Sensitive Information Collected via Computer InterviewEducational and Psychological Measurement, 47
C. Banyan, D. Stein (1990)
Voice Synthesis Supplement to a Computerized Interviewing Training Program: Retention EffectsTeaching of Psychology, 17
J. Catania, D. Gibson, D. Chitwood, T. Coates (1990)
Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior.Psychological bulletin, 108 3
The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a study assessing the acceptability of a computer HIV risk assessment instrument administered to not-in-treatment drug users. The study asked three questions related to acceptability: (1) are drug users comfortable responding to HIV risk questions using the computer assessment; (2) do drug users feel that they possess the requisite skill to respond to questions using a computer; and (3) do drug users believe that the responses they provide using the computer assessment will remain private and confidential. This study differs from other assessments of the acceptability of computer assisted data collection in that the population of interest has only limited education and interaction with computers. Furthermore, the study was implemented under field conditions. To conduct the study, an existing HIV risk assessment instrument was adapted for use with the computer. Only slight modifications were made to the content of the instrument. To facilitate data collection with this population, audio enhancement and touch screen were used. Three scales measuring comfort, skill and perceived privacy were developed. Results of analysis showed that drug users are comfortable responding to an HIV risk assessment using computer assisted interviewing. Drug users also perceived that they possessed the requisite skill to successfully complete the interview. And, study participants reported that they believed that their responses using the computer interview would remain private and confidential. Only minor differences in scale scores based on sociodemographic characteristics were found among study participants. Implications of the findings are discussed.
AIDS Care – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.