Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/cognitive-constraints-on-multimedia-learning-when-presenting-more-VCgCKR81a0
References (31)
-
S. Wade, R. Adams (1990)
Effects of Importance and Interest on Recall of Biographical TextJournal of Literacy Research, 22
-
Thomas Keenan (1964)
Computers and educationCommun. ACM, 7
-
R. Moreno, R. Mayer (2000)
A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92
-
Sharon Tindall-Ford, Paul Chandler, J. Sweller (1997)
When two sensory modes are better than oneJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3
-
10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
-
R. Mayer, R. Moreno (1998)
A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working MemoryJournal of Educational Psychology, 90
-
B. Mann (1997)
Evaluation of presentation modalities in a hypermedia systemComput. Educ., 28
-
R. Mayer (1999)
Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: The case of multimedia explanationsDocument Design, 1
-
R. Mayer (1999)
Multimedia aids to problem-solving transferInternational Journal of Educational Research, 31
-
Baddeley (1992)
Working memory.Science, 255
-
(1999)
The promise of educational psychology -
Slava Kalyuga, Paul Chandler, J. Sweller (1999)
Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instructionApplied Cognitive Psychology, 13
-
Patricia Mohr, J. Glover, R. Ronning (1984)
The Effect of Related and Unrelated Details on the Recall of Major Ideas in ProseJournal of Literacy Research, 16
-
R. Garner, M. Gillingham, C. White (1989)
Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and ChildrenCognition and Instruction, 6
-
James Clark, A. Paivio (1991)
Dual coding theory and educationEducational Psychology Review, 3
-
J. Bobis, J. Sweller, M. Cooper (1993)
Cognitive load effects in a primary-school geometry taskLearning and Instruction, 3
-
S. Hidi, W. Baird (1988)
Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts.Reading Research Quarterly, 23
-
Shannon Harp, R. Mayer (1997)
The Role of Interest in Learning From Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction Between Emotional Interest and Cognitive InterestJournal of Educational Psychology, 89
-
J. Sweller, Paul Chandler (1994)
Why Some Material Is Difficult to LearnCognition and Instruction, 12
-
K. Renninger, S. Hidi, A. Krapp (1994)
The Role Of Interest In Learning And DevelopmentAmerican Journal of Psychology, 107
-
R. Garner, Rachel Brown, Sylvia Sanders, D. Menke (1992)
"Seductive details" and learning from text. -
R. Mayer (1996)
Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge constructionEducational Psychology Review, 8
-
M. Wittrock (1989)
Generative Processes of ComprehensionEducational Psychologist, 24
-
J. Plass, Dorothy Chun, R. Mayer, D. Leutner (1998)
SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENTJournal of Educational Psychology, 90
-
Richard Mayer (1997)
Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?Educational Psychologist, 32
-
Slava Kalyuga, Paul Chandler, J. Sweller (1998)
Levels of Expertise and Instructional DesignHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40
-
Larry Shirey, R. Reynolds (1988)
Effect of Interest on Attention and LearningJournal of Educational Psychology, 80
-
Paul Chandler, J. Sweller (1996)
Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer ProgramApplied Cognitive Psychology, 10
-
Paul Chandler, J. Sweller (1991)
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of InstructionCognition and Instruction, 8
-
R. Moreno, R. Mayer (1999)
Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and ContiguityJournal of Educational Psychology, 91
-
J. Dewey, J. Wheeler (1975)
Interest and Effort in Education
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2001 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0022-0663
- eISSN
- 1939-2176
- DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
In 4 experiments, college students viewed an animation and listened to concurrent narration explaining the formation of lightning. When students also received concurrent on-screen text that summarized (Experiment 1) or duplicated (Experiment 2) the narration, they performed worse on tests of retention and transfer than did students who received no on-screen text. This redundancy effect is consistent with a dual-channel theory of multimedia learning in which adding on-screen text can overload the visual information-processing channel, causing learners to split their visual attention between 2 sources. Lower transfer performance also occurred when the authors added interesting but irrelevant details to the narration (Experiment 1) or inserted interesting but conceptually irrelevant video clips within (Experiment 3) or before the presentation (Experiment 4). This coherence effect is consistent with a seductive details hypothesis in which the inserted video and narration prime the activation of inappropriate prior knowledge as the organizing schema for the lesson.
Journal
Journal of Educational Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Mar 1, 2001