Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Beggs (1981)
Assessing the potential demand for electric carsJournal of Econometrics, 16
L. Thurstone (1927)
A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 4
J. Louviere (1988)
Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 10
N. Hanley (1993)
THE CONTINGENT VALUATION OF FOREST CHARACTERISTICS: TWO EXPERIMENTSJournal of Agricultural Economics, 44
J. Louviere, G. Woodworth (1983)
Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer ChoiceJournal of Marketing Research, 20
R. Ready, J. Buzby, D. Hu (1996)
Differences between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Valuation EstimatesLand Economics, 72
T. Brown, P. Champ, R. Bishop, D. McCollum (1996)
Response Formats and Public Good DonationsLand Economics, 72
I. Bateman, I. Langford, R. K. Turner, K. Willis, G. Garrod (1995)
Elicitation and Truncation Effects in Contingent Valuation StudiesEcological Economics, 12
Entec (1997)
Valuing Landscape Improvements in British Forests
J. Louviere (1996)
The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources
J. MacKenzie (1993)
A Comparison of Contingent Preference ModelsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75
J. Louviere (1988)
Conjoint Analysis Modelling of Stated PreferencesJournal of Transport Economics and Policy, 10
C. Manski (1977)
The Structure of Random Utility ModelsTheory and Decision, 8
J. Louviere (1992)
Experimental choice analysis: Introduction and overviewJournal of Business Research, 24
J. Louviere (1988)
Analyzing Individual Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis
I. Bateman (1995)
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studiesEcological Economics, 12
C. Manski (1977)
The structure of random utility modelsTheory and Decision, 8
W. Adamowicz, J. Swait, P. Boxall, J. Louviere, M. Williams (1997)
Perceptions Versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental ValuationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32
T. Brown (1996)
Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?Land Economics, 72
S. Beggs, S. Cardell, J. Hausman (1981)
Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric CarsJournal of Econometrics, 16
K. Lancaster (1966)
A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 74
J. Louviere (1988)
Analyzing Decision Making
K. Lancaster (1966)
A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 74
J. MacKenzie (1993)
A Comparison of Contingent Preference ModelsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75
J. Swait (1994)
A Structural Equation Model of Latent Segmentation and Product Choice for Cross Sectional, Revealed Preference DataJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1
K. Willis, J. Benson (1989)
Recreation Value of ForestsForestry, 62
W. Adamowicz (1994)
Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental AmenitiesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26
D. McFadden (1974)
Frontiers in Econometrics
K. Willis (1989)
Recreational Values of ForestsForestry, 62
B. Roe (1996)
Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating VariationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31
J. Swait (1994)
A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice dataJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1
W. Adamowicz (1997)
Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental ValuationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32
(1995)
The Value of Biodiversity in UK forests
P. Boxall, W. Adamowicz, J. Swait, M. Williams, J. Louviere (1996)
A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental ValuationEcological Economics, 18
J. Louviere (1983)
Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate DataJournal of Marketing Research, 20
W. Adamowicz, J. Louviere, M. Williams (1994)
Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental AmenitiesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26
N. Hanley, R. Ruffell (1993)
The Contingent Valuation of Forest Characteristics: Two ApproachesJournal of Agricultural Economics, 44
J. Louviere (1992)
Experimental Choice Analysis: Introduction and OverviewJournal of Business Research, 24
R. Ready (1996)
Differences between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value EstimatesLand Economics, 72
N. Bockstael, K. McConnell, I. Strand (1991)
Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality
L. Thurstone (1927)
A Law of Comparative JudgementPsychological Review, 4
B. Roe, K. Boyle, M. Teisl (1996)
Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating VariationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31
P. Boxall (1996)
A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuationEcological Economics, 18
M. Ben-Akiva, S. Lerman (1985)
Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand
W. Adamowicz (1995)
Environmental Valuation: New Persectives
D. Anderson (1990)
The Forestry Industry and the Greenhouse Effect
This paper we outline the “choice experiment” approach to environmental valuation. This approach has its roots in Lancaster's characteristics theory of value, in random utility theory and in experimental design. We show how marginal values for the attributes of environmental assets, such as forests and rivers, can be estimated from pair-wise choices, as well as the value of the environmental asset as a whole. These choice pairs are designed so as to allow efficient statistical estimation of the underlying utility function, and to minimise required sample size. Choice experiments have important advantages over other environmental valuation methods, such as contingent valuation and travel cost-type models, although many design issues remain unresolved. Applications to environmental issues have so far been relatively limited. We illustrate the use of choice experiments with reference to a recent UK study on public preferences for alternative forest landscapes. This study allows us to perform a convergent validity test on the choice experiment estimates of willingness to pay.
Environmental and Resource Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 23, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.