Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Topos Perspective on the Kochen–Specker Theorem: IV. Interval Valuations

Topos Perspective on the Kochen–Specker Theorem: IV. Interval Valuations We extend the topos-theoretic treatment given in previous papers (Butterfield, J. and Isham, C. J. (1999). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38, 827–859; Hamilton, J., Butterfield, J., and Isham, C. J. (2000). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39, 1413–1436; Isham, C. J. and Butterfield, J. (1998). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37, 2669–2733) of assigning values to quantities in quantum theory. In those papers, the main idea was to assign a sieve as a partial and contextual truth value to a proposition that the value of a quantity lies in a certain set $$\Delta \subseteq \mathbb{R}$$ . Here we relate such sieve-valued valuations to valuations that assign to quantities subsets, rather than single elements, of their spectra (we call these “interval” valuations). There are two main results. First, there is a natural correspondence between these two kinds of valuation, which uses the notion of a state's support for a quantity (Section 3). Second, if one starts with a more general notion of interval valuation, one sees that our interval valuations based on the notion of support (and correspondingly, our sieve-valued valuations) are a simple way to secure certain natural properties of valuations, such as monotonicity (Section 4). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Theoretical Physics Springer Journals

Topos Perspective on the Kochen–Specker Theorem: IV. Interval Valuations

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/topos-perspective-on-the-kochen-specker-theorem-iv-interval-valuations-UGHNxlX3pm

References (17)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Plenum Publishing Corporation
Subject
Physics; Physics, general; Quantum Physics; Elementary Particles, Quantum Field Theory; Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics
ISSN
0020-7748
eISSN
1572-9575
DOI
10.1023/A:1015276209768
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We extend the topos-theoretic treatment given in previous papers (Butterfield, J. and Isham, C. J. (1999). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38, 827–859; Hamilton, J., Butterfield, J., and Isham, C. J. (2000). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39, 1413–1436; Isham, C. J. and Butterfield, J. (1998). International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37, 2669–2733) of assigning values to quantities in quantum theory. In those papers, the main idea was to assign a sieve as a partial and contextual truth value to a proposition that the value of a quantity lies in a certain set $$\Delta \subseteq \mathbb{R}$$ . Here we relate such sieve-valued valuations to valuations that assign to quantities subsets, rather than single elements, of their spectra (we call these “interval” valuations). There are two main results. First, there is a natural correspondence between these two kinds of valuation, which uses the notion of a state's support for a quantity (Section 3). Second, if one starts with a more general notion of interval valuation, one sees that our interval valuations based on the notion of support (and correspondingly, our sieve-valued valuations) are a simple way to secure certain natural properties of valuations, such as monotonicity (Section 4).

Journal

International Journal of Theoretical PhysicsSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 30, 2004

There are no references for this article.