Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling (1997)
Distributive justice and willingness to pay for municipality child careSoc. Justice Res., 10
A. Wit, H. A. M. Wilke, H. Oppewal (1992)
Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings
E. Van Dijk (1993)
Coordination in asymmetric social dilemmas
W. Stroebe, B. S. Frey (1982)
Self-interested and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goodsBr. J. Soc. Psychol., 21
S. T. Allison (1992)
Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resourcesJ. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 28
H. A. M. Wilke (1986)
Equity and individual preferences in an MDGEur. J. Soc. Psychol., 16
M. Deutsch (1975)
Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?J. Soc. Issues, 31
C. G. Rutte (1987)
Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemmaJ. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 23
R. M. Dawes (1980)
Social dilemmasAnn. Rev. Psychol., 31
T. Tyler, R. M. Dawes (1993)
Psychological Perspective on Justice: Theory and Applications
S. T. Allison, D. M. Messick (1990)
Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resourcesJ. Behav. Decision Making, 3
G. Mitchell, P. E. Tetlock, B. A. Mellers, L. D. Ordóñex (1993)
Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiencyJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 65
G. Marwell (1979)
Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. I. Resources, Interest, Group Size, and the Free-Rider ProblemAm. J. Sociol., 84
W. Stroebe (1982)
Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goodsBr. J. Soc. Psychol., 21
A. Rapoport (1988)
Provision of step-level goods: Effects of inequality in resourcesJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54
S. S. Komorita (1982)
Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situation.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 42
R. M. Dawes (1980)
Social DilemmasAnn. Rev. Psychol., 31
R. M. Dawes (1977)
Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 35
H. Hamburger, M. Guyer, J. Fox (1975)
Group size and cooperationJ. Conflict Resolution, 19
R. J. Harris, M. A. Joyce (1980)
What's fair? It depends on how you phrase the questionJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 38
R. J. Harris (1980)
What's fair? It depends on how you phrase the question.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 38
C. G. Rutte, H. A. M. Wilke, D. Messick (1987)
Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemmaJ. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 23
H. Hamburger (1975)
Group Size and CooperationJ. Conflict Resolution, 19
A. Rapoport (1989)
Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and relative group size.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 56
A. Rapoport, G. Bornstein, I. Erev (1989)
Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and relative group sizeJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 56
D. M. Messick (1983)
Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 44
D. M. Messick, T. Schell (1992)
Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision makingActa Psychol, 80
D. M. Messick, H. Wilke, M. B. Brewer, R. M. Kramer, P. E. Zemke, L. Lui (1983)
Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmasJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 44
S. T. Allison, L. R. McQueen, L. M. Schaerfl (1992)
Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resourcesJ. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 28
E. Van Dijk, M. Grodzka (1992)
The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step goodJ. Econ. Psychol., 13
A. Rapoport (1988)
Provision of step-level public goods: Effects of inequality in resources.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54
A. Biel (1997)
Distributive justice and willingness to pay for municipality child careSoc. Justice Res., 10
A. Rapoport (1993)
Incremental Contribution in Step-Level Public Goods Games with Asymmetric PlayersOrgan. Behav. Hum. Decision Process., 55
M. Olson (1965)
The Logic of Collective Action
H. A. M. Wilke, W. B. G. Liebrand, B. Lotgerink, B. Buurma (1986)
Equity and individual preferences in a MDGEur. J. Soc. Psychol., 16
M. Olson (1965)
The Logic of Collective Action
R. M. Dawes, J. McTavish, H. Shaklee (1977)
Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situationJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 35
S. S. Komorita, C. W. Lapworth (1982)
Cooperative choice among individuals versus groups in an N-person dilemma situationJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 42
A. Rapoport, R. Suleiman (1993)
Incremental contribution in step-level public goods games with asymmetric playersOrgan. Behav. Hum. Decision Process., 55
D. M. Messick (1992)
Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision makingActa Psychol, 80
S. T. Allison (1990)
Social Decision Heuristics in the Use of Shared ResourcesJ. Behav. Decision Making, 3
T. Tyler (1993)
Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives
M. Deutsch (1975)
Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues, 31
G. Mitchell (1993)
Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 65
E. Van Dijk (1992)
The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step goodJ. Econ. Psychol., 13
G. Marwell, R. E. Ames (1979)
Experiments on provision of public goods. I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problemAm. J. Sociol., 84
H. A. M. Wilke (1991)
European Review of Social Psychology
Public-goods dilemmas are characterized by conflicts between self-interest and the welfare of a group or society at large. Research has identified several factors that enhance cooperation in such dilemmas. However, less is known about how concern for distributive justice affects willingness to contribute in asymmetric public-goods dilemmas. To test the hypothesis that contributions to a common resource is related to perceived fairness, experiments were performed to investigate willingness to pay to the social service of child care in hypothetical societies. Experiment 1 aimed at replicating a previous survey study (Biel et al., 1997). Experiments 2 and 3 were extensions. In all three experiments subjects were asked to indicate how fair they considered different distributions of the quality of child care provided by their municipality. These distributions corresponded to the principles of equality, equity, and need. University students (32, 48, and 32 in the three experiments, respectively) served as subjects. Ratings of perceived fairness were positively related to willingness to pay. Other factors also positively related to willingness to pay included ability to pay, personal need, expected payment from others, and the number of households who had to contribute in order to maintain the quality. Furthermore, decreasing municipality size increased willingness to pay.
Social Justice Research – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 6, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.