Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Spendolini (1992)
The Benchmarking Book
Aviv Shoham, Avi Fiegenbaum (2002)
Competitive determinants of organizational risk‐taking attitude: the role of strategic reference pointsManagement Decision, 40
Anil Nair, S. Kotha (2001)
Does group membership matter? Evidence from the Japanese steel industrySouthern Medical Journal, 22
M. Easterby-Smith, R. Thorpe, A. Lowe (1991)
Management Research: An Introduction
M. Weggeman (1996)
Sensemaking in organisationsHolland management review, 1
Avi Fiegenbaum, D. Sudharshan, H. Thomas (1987)
The concept of stable strategic time periods in strategic group researchManagerial and Decision Economics, 8
A. Athanassopoulos (2003)
Strategic Groups, Frontier Benchmarking and Performance Differences: Evidence from the UK Retail Grocery Industry*Journal of Management Studies, 40
M. Yasin (2002)
The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and nowBenchmarking: An International Journal, 9
R. Dattakumar, R. Jagadeesh (2003)
A review of literature on benchmarkingBenchmarking: An International Journal, 10
D. Sudharshan, H. Thomas, Avi Fiegenbaum (1991)
Assessing Mobility Barriers In Dynamic Strategic Groups AnalysisJournal of Management Studies, 28
Edward López (2001)
New Anti-Merger Theories: A CritiqueEmory Economics
Mike Peng, Justin Tan, Tony Tong (2004)
Ownership Types and Strategic Groups in an Emerging EconomyERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Organizational Forms (Topic)
Ken Smith, C. Grimm, Greg Young, S. Wally (1997)
STRATEGIC GROUPS AND RIVALROUS FIRM BEHAVIOR: TOWARDS A RECONCILIATIONStrategic Management Journal, 18
J. Porac, H. Thomas (1990)
Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor DefinitionAcademy of Management Review, 15
H. Hyman (1980)
The psychology of status
Avi Fiegenbaum, H. Thomas (1995)
Strategic Groups as Reference Groups: Theory, Modeling and Empirical Examination of Industry and Competitive StrategySouthern Medical Journal, 16
E. Mason (1949)
The Current Status of the Monopoly Problem in the United StatesHarvard Law Review, 62
G. Panagiotou (2006)
Managerial cognitions of competitive environments: a strategic group analysisManagement Research News, 29
K. Kumar, H. Thomas, Avi Fiegenbaum (1990)
Strategic groupings as competitive benchmarks for formulating future competitive strategy: A modelling approachManagerial and Decision Economics, 11
G. McNamara, David Deephouse, R. Luce (2002)
Competitive Positioning Withing and Across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary FirmsAlberta: Strategic Management & Organization (Topic)
K. Daniels, G. Johnson, L. Chernatony (1994)
Differences in Managerial Cognitions of Competition1British Journal of Management, 5
T. Ferguson, David Deephouse, W. Ferguson (1999)
Do Strategic Groups Differ in Reputation?O&M: Personnel Management eJournal
R. Reger, A. Huff (1993)
STRATEGIC GROUPS: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVESouthern Medical Journal, 14
C. Flavián, Yolanda Polo (1999)
Strategic groups analysis (SGA) as a tool for strategic marketingEuropean Journal of Marketing, 33
J. McGee, H. Thomas, Mark Pruett (1995)
Strategic Groups and the Analysis of Market Structure and Industry Dynamics1British Journal of Management, 6
K. Daniels, G. Johnson, L. Chernatony (2002)
Task and Institutional Influences on Managers' Mental Models of CompetitionOrganization Studies, 23
G. Leask, D. Parker (2006)
Strategic group theory: review, examination and application in the UK pharmaceutical industryJournal of Management Development, 25
J. Bain (1951)
Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65
Avi Fiegenbaum, S. Hart, D. Schendel (1996)
STRATEGIC REFERENCE POINT THEORYStrategic Management Journal, 17
Avi Fiegenbaum, H. Thomas (1990)
STRATEGIC GROUPS AND PERFORMANCE: THE U.S. INSURANCE INDUSTRY, 1970-84Southern Medical Journal, 11
J. Bain (1957)
Barriers to new competition
E. Dawson, E. Chatman (2001)
Reference group theory with implications for information studies: a theoretical essayInf. Res., 6
Karel Cool, D. Schendel (1988)
Performance differences among strategic group membersSouthern Medical Journal, 9
K. Hatten, Mary Hatten (1987)
Strategic groups, asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestabilitySouthern Medical Journal, 8
Aneel Karnani (1984)
The Value of Market Share and the Product Life Cycle-A Game-Theoretic ModelManagement Science, 30
J. Osborne, C. Stubbart, A. Ramaprasad (2001)
Strategic groups and competitive enactment: a study of dynamic relationships between mental models and performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 22
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
Aneel Karnani (1982)
Equilibrium market share—a measure of competitive strengthSouthern Medical Journal, 3
G. Panagiotou (2006)
The impact of managerial cognitions on the structure‐conduct‐performance (SCP) paradigm: A strategic group perspectiveManagement Decision, 44
K. Kumar (1987)
The relationship between mixed strategies and strategic groupsManagerial and Decision Economics, 8
Karel Cool, Ingemar Dierickx (1993)
Rivalry, Strategic Groups and Firm ProfitabilityStrategic Management Journal, 14
N. Nohria, Carlos García-Pont (1991)
Global strategic linkages and industry structureSouthern Medical Journal, 12
R. Turner (1955)
Reference Groups of Future-Oriented MenSocial Forces, 34
J. Porac, H. Thomas, C. Baden-Fuller (1989)
Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers RevisitedCSN: Business (Topic)
C.H. Cooley
Human Nature and the Social Order
D. Paton, F. Wilson (2001)
Managerial perceptions of competition in knitwear producersJournal of Managerial Psychology, 16
G. Hodgkinson (1997)
Cognitive Inertia in a Turbulent Market: The Case of UK Residential Estate AgentsInnovation & Organizational Behavior eJournal
M. Lawless, L. Tegarden (1991)
A Test Of Performance Similarity Among Strategic Group Members In Conforming And Non‐Conforming Industry StructuresJournal of Management Studies, 28
M. Álvarez (2004)
A broad study of the strategic group – performance relation: the movement of Spanish savings and loans across strategic groupsManagement Research News, 27
K. Hatten, D. Schendel (1977)
Heterogeneity within an Industry: Firm Conduct in the U.S. Brewing Industry, 1952-71Journal of Industrial Economics, 26
(1980)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Purpose – The concept of strategic groups is a central theme in the field of strategic management, and over time it has been used by a considerable body of theoretical and empirical literature to examine different aspects of competitive strategy. However, to date, there has been little systematic investigation that examines aspects associated with competitive benchmarking and the impact and effect that this has on strategy development. Thus despite the level of knowledge that has been accumulated over the years regarding the dynamics of competitive landscapes, our understanding of the impact and effect of this particular matter on decision making is limited. More importantly, studies that have addressed the topic are either theoretical alone in contents or have only used secondary data. Equally, these studies have approached the subject mostly from an impersonal mathematical perspective and practitioners' views on the issue have been overlooked. This paper aims to address these weaknesses in the literature. In doing so, it seeks to place attention on the individual, which has been overlooked by previous examinations. Design/methodology/approach – The research is cross‐sectional and it is based on primary methodology, having employed qualitative techniques for analysis. It involves face‐to‐face semi‐structured interviews combined with the repertory grid technique. The industry investigated is the UK mainstream leisure foreign package holidays. The sample size is near to the sampling frame of the research and the investigation took place between March and August 2003. Findings – It was found that managers of firms from the same strategic group consider their group as a reference point in their decision‐making process and as a result of their benchmarking observations they adjust their firms' competitive strategies to reflect their group's strategic behaviour. It was also found that firms of the same strategic group are more likely to respond to market conditions and events in a similar manner. Originality/value – This paper examined issues associated with benchmarking, in the context of strategic groups, having employed primary qualitative research strategies in order to add “fresh” data on a topic that so far has merely been investigated quantitatively through secondary sources alone. As such, it has initiated a much needed contents dimension on the topic to complement the activity and process‐oriented only studies in the area. The research not only tested earlier propositions in order to accumulate more evidence in the field and enable better generalisations on the subject but it has also expanded current theories in the area.
Management Decision – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 20, 2007
Keywords: Strategic groups; Strategic management; Competitive strategy; Benchmarking
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.