Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
David Brown, R. Cortez, M. Minion (2001)
Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier—Stokes equationsJournal of Computational Physics, 168
O. Botella (1997)
On the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using Chebyshev projection schemes with third-order accuracy in timeComputers & Fluids, 26
N. Nikitin (1994)
A spectral finite-difference method of calculating turbulent flows of an incompressible fluid in pipes and channelsComputational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 34
R. Verzicco, P. Orlandi (1996)
A Finite-Difference Scheme for Three-Dimensional Incompressible Flows in Cylindrical CoordinatesJournal of Computational Physics, 123
N. Nikitin (1996)
Statistical characteristics of wall turbulenceFluid Dynamics, 31
(1987)
Solving Ordinary Di(cid:2)erential Equations. I. Nonsti(cid:2) Problems
P. Spalart, R. Moser, M. Rogers (1991)
Spectral methods for the Navier-Stokes equations with one infinite and two periodic directionsJournal of Computational Physics, 96
John Kim, P. Moin (1984)
Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes EquationsJournal of Computational Physics, 59
P. Swarztrauber (1974)
A direct Method for the Discrete Solution of Separable Elliptic EquationsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 11
NAVIER–
J. Dukowicz, A. Dvinsky (1992)
Approximate factorization as a high order splitting for the implicit incompressible flow equationsJournal of Computational Physics, 102
J. Perot (1993)
An analysis of the fractional step methodJournal of Computational Physics, 108
M. Rai, P. Moin (1989)
Direct simulations of turbulent flow using finite-difference schemesJournal of Computational Physics, 96
A semi‐implicit three‐step Runge–Kutta scheme for the unsteady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with third‐order accuracy in time is presented. The higher order of accuracy as compared to the existing semi‐implicit Runge–Kutta schemes is achieved due to one additional inversion of the implicit operator I‐τγL, which requires inversion of tridiagonal matrices when using approximate factorization method. No additional solution of the pressure‐Poisson equation or evaluation of Navier–Stokes operator is needed. The scheme is supplied with a local error estimation and time‐step control algorithm. The temporal third‐order accuracy of the scheme is proved analytically and ascertained by analysing both local and global errors in a numerical example. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids – Wiley
Published: May 20, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.