Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joseph Gyourko (1987)
Effects of local tax structures on the factor intensity composition of manufacturing activity across citiesJournal of Urban Economics, 22
R. Erickson, M. Wasylenko (1980)
Firm relocation and site selection in suburban municipalitiesJournal of Urban Economics, 8
Gerald Carlino, E. Mills (1987)
The determinants of county growth.Journal of regional science, 27 1
L. Helms (1985)
The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Growth: A Time Series-Cross Section ApproachThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 67
Mahlon Straszhem (1987)
The theory of urban residential locationHandbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 2
(1980)
The location of firms: The role of taxes and fiscal incentives
W. Fox (1981)
Fiscal Differentials and Industrial Location: Some Empirical EvidenceUrban Studies, 18
Ronald Grieson (1980)
Theoretical analysis and empirical measurements of the effects of the Philadelphia income taxJournal of Urban Economics, 8
D. Steinnes, Walter Fisher (1974)
AN ECONOMETRIC MODEL OF INTRAURBAN LOCATIONJournal of Regional Science, 14
H. Herzog (1992)
Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development PoliciesEconomic Geography, 68
(1988)
City taxes and property tax
John Gruenstein (1980)
Jobs in the city: can Philadelphia afford to raise taxes?The Business Review
Helen Ladd, K. Bradbury (1987)
CITY TAXES AND PROPERTY TAX BASESNational Tax Journal, 41
T. Mcguire (1985)
Are local property taxes important in the intrametropolitan location decisions of firms? An empirical analysis of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan areaJournal of Urban Economics, 18
A. Charney (1983)
Intraurban manufacturing location decisions and local tax differentialsJournal of Urban Economics, 14
G. Palumbo, S. Sacks, M. Wasylenko (1990)
Population decentralization within metropolitan areas: 1970-1980.Journal of urban economics, 27 2
Peter Linneman (1980)
Some empirical results on the nature of the hedonic price function for the urban housing marketJournal of Urban Economics, 8
(1991)
Who benefits from state
W. Grubb (1982)
The flight to the suburbs of population and employment, 1960-1970.Journal of urban economics, 11 3
(1990)
Population decentralization within metropoli
William Stull, J. Stull (1991)
Capitalization of local income taxesJournal of Urban Economics, 29
D. Bradford, H. Kelejian (1973)
An Econometric Model of the Flight to the SuburbsJournal of Political Economy, 81
J. Hausman (1978)
Specification tests in econometricsApplied Econometrics, 38
M. Wasylenko (1980)
Evidence of Fiscal Differentials and Intrametropolitan Firm RelocationLand Economics, 56
(1987)
Philadelphia's fiscal management of economic transition
A. Reschovsky (1979)
Residential choice and the local public sector: An alternative test of the “Tiebout Hypothesis”Journal of Urban Economics, 6
Anita Summers, T. Luce (1986)
Economic Development Within the Philadelphia Metropolitan Area
W. McHone (1986)
Supply-Side Considerations in the Location of Industry in Suburban Communities: Empirical Evidence from the Philadelphia SMSALand Economics, 62
Walter Fisher, Marjorie Fishert (1975)
THE SPATIAL ALLOCATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND RESIDENCE WITHIN A METROPOLITAN AREAJournal of Regional Science, 15
E. Mills, R. Price (1984)
Metropolitan suburbanization and central city problemsJournal of Urban Economics, 15
E. Mills (1972)
Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy
R. McHugh, James Wilkinson (1988)
A RANDOM EFFECTS APPROACH TO SUBSTATE GROWTH MODELS: A COMMENT ON “THE DETERMINANTS OF COUNTY GROWTH”*Journal of Regional Science, 28
This work examines the effects of local public sector tax and spending decisions onthe intrametropolitan location of jobs and workers. Municipality-level data for theentire Philadelphia metropolitan area are used to estimate a two equation partialadjustment model of firm and household location. Effective local property andincome tax rates and spending data for three (exhaustive) service categories areincluded. The model is estimated for total employment and six sectors The findingsimply that employment location is more sensitive to local government activities thanis household location. Firms m most sectors react to both tax and spending policies.The effects on employment of local tax increases can be partially offset if the highertaxes supplement particular types of spending. However, differences across sectorsimply that the net effect on total employment will be negative except in very specialcircumstances. Household behavior, on the other hand, is affected only by schoolspending. The findings also imply that models based on highly aggregated measuresof employment or economic activity understate the speed of adjustment of the system,resulting in overstated estimates of long-run tax and spending effects.
Public Finance Quarterly – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.