Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Hedrick (2005)
A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE, 59
M. Nei (1973)
Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70 12
Yannis Michdakis, Lament Excoffied (2002)
A Generic Estimation of Population Subdivision Using Distances Between Alleles With Special Reference for Microsatellite Loci
L. Excoffier, P. Smouse, J. Quattro (1992)
Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data.Genetics, 131 2
Y. Michalakis, Laurent Excoffier (1996)
A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci.Genetics, 142 3
M. Nei (1987)
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
M. Slatkin (1995)
A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.Genetics, 139 1
M. Kimura, J. Crow (1964)
THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.Genetics, 49
J. Goudet, Michel Raymond, M. Raymond, T. de-Meeus, F. Rousset (1996)
Testing differentiation in diploid populations.Genetics, 144 4
B. Weir, C. Cockerham (1984)
ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTUREEvolution, 38
F. Balloux (2001)
EASYPOP (version 1.7): a computer program for population genetics simulations.The Journal of heredity, 92 3
N. Ryman, S. Palm, C. André, G. Carvalho, T. Dahlgren, P. Jorde, L. Laikre, Lena Larsson, A. Palmé, D. Ruzzante (2006)
Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker lociMolecular Ecology, 15
P. O’Reilly, M. Canino, K. Bailey, P. Bentzen (2004)
Inverse relationship between FST and microsatellite polymorphism in the marine fish, walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma): implications for resolving weak population structureMolecular Ecology, 13
S. Wright (1965)
THE INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION STRUCTURE BY F‐STATISTICS WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO SYSTEMS OF MATINGEvolution, 19
Abstract Comparison of population structure between studies can be difficult, because the value of the often‐used FST‐statistic depends on the amount of genetic variation within populations. Recently, a standardized measure of genetic differentiation was developed based on GST, which addressed this problem, though no method was provided to estimate this standardized measure without bias. Here I present a method to estimate a standardized measure of population differentiation based on the analysis of molecular variance framework. One advantage of the method is that it can be readily expanded to include different hierarchical levels in the tested population structure.
Evolution – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.