Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Cancer in the Contralateral Breast after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Cancer in the Contralateral Breast after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer To the Editor: In the March 19 issue, Boice et al.1 present data to indicate that radiotherapy for breast cancer contributes little to the already high risk of a second cancer in the opposite breast. They note, however, that the risk was significantly increased among women who underwent irradiation at a relatively young age (<45 years). They estimate that the average dose of radiation to the contralateral breast among the exposed women was 2.82 Gy. This average dose exceeds that in other reports2 and may reflect technical factors such as the orientation of the anterior internal mammary field and the . . . http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The New England Journal of Medicine The New England Journal of Medicine

Cancer in the Contralateral Breast after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

The New England Journal of Medicine , Volume 327 (6): 3 – Aug 6, 1992

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/cancer-in-the-contralateral-breast-after-radiotherapy-for-breast-Prwj8Ef9Fd

References (33)

Publisher
The New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN
0028-4793
eISSN
1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/NEJM199208063270614
pmid
1625721
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To the Editor: In the March 19 issue, Boice et al.1 present data to indicate that radiotherapy for breast cancer contributes little to the already high risk of a second cancer in the opposite breast. They note, however, that the risk was significantly increased among women who underwent irradiation at a relatively young age (<45 years). They estimate that the average dose of radiation to the contralateral breast among the exposed women was 2.82 Gy. This average dose exceeds that in other reports2 and may reflect technical factors such as the orientation of the anterior internal mammary field and the . . .

Journal

The New England Journal of MedicineThe New England Journal of Medicine

Published: Aug 6, 1992

There are no references for this article.