Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Malsburg (1995)
Binding in models of perception and brain functionCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 5
Journalof Neurophysioldgy, Keiji Tanaka, H. Saito, Yoshiro F’UKADA, M. Moriya (1991)
Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey.Journal of neurophysiology, 66 1
J. Beck (1982)
Organization and representation in perception
Correspondence and requests for materials should be sent to Marius Usher
S. Keele, A. Cohen, R. Ivry, M. Liotti, P. Yee (1988)
Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 14 3
M. Fahle, C. Koch (1995)
Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural bindingVision Research, 35
W. Singer, C. Gray (1995)
Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis.Annual review of neuroscience, 18
Daniel Kiper, Karl Gegenfurtner, J. Movshon (1996)
Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentationVision Research, 36
Karlenf ball, R. Sekuler, J. Machamer (1983)
Detection and identification of moving targetsVision Research, 23
J. Lund, T. Yoshioka, J. Levitt (1993)
Comparison of intrinsic connectivity in different areas of macaque monkey cerebral cortex.Cerebral cortex, 3 2
(1985)
Functional organisation of primate visual cortex
M. Ben-Av, D. Sagi (1995)
Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: Experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelationsVision Research, 35
M. Fahle (1993)
Figure–ground discrimination from temporal informationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 254
P. Milner (1974)
A model for visual shape recognition.Psychological review, 81 6
T. Oyama, Wataru Yamada (1978)
Perceptual grouping between successively presented stimuli and its relation to visual simultaneity and maskingPsychological Research, 40
DC Van Essen (1985)
Cerebral Cortex
D. Field, A. Hayes, R. Hess (1993)
Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”Vision Research, 33
D. Ts'o, C. Gilbert, T. Wiesel (1986)
Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis, 6
W Singer, AK Engel, AK Kreiter, MHJ Munk (1997)
Neuronal assemblies: necessity, significance and detectability.Trends Cogn. Sci., 1
P. Roelfsema, P. König, A. Engel, R. Sireteanu, W. Singer (1994)
Reduced Synchronization in the Visual Cortex of Cats with Strabismic AmblyopiaEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 6
U. Leonards, W. Singer, M. Fahle (1996)
The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture SegmentationVision Research, 36
R. Gregory (1969)
Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing
W. Singer, A. Engel, A. Kreiter, M. Munk, S. Neuenschwander, P. Roelfsema (1997)
Neuronal assemblies: necessity, signature and detectabilityTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 1
F. Crick, C. Koch (1990)
Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness
G. Loftus, T. Busey, J. Senders (1993)
Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisitionPerception & Psychophysics, 54
U. Leonards, W. Singer (1998)
Two segmentation mechanisms with differential sensitivity for colour and luminance contrastVision Research, 38
M. Coltheart (1980)
Iconic memory and visible persistencePerception & Psychophysics, 27
E. Domany, J. Hammen, K. Schulten (1991)
Models of Neural Networks I
C. Malsburg (1994)
The Correlation Theory of Brain Function
Ernst Niebur and Dov Sagi for very helpful discussions, Neil Blue and Andrew Found for software assistance, and David Vernon and Zeri James for help in running experiments
JS Lund, Y Takashi, JB Levitt (1993)
Comparison of intrinsic connectivity in different cortex of the cerebral cortex.Cerebral Cortex, 3
The visual system analyses information by decomposing complex objects into simple components (visual features) that are widely distributed across the cortex 1 , 2 . When several objects are present simultaneously in the visual field, a mechanism is required to group (bind) together visual features that belong to each object and to separate (segment) them from features of other objects. An attractive scheme for binding visual features into a coherent percept consists of synchronizing the activity of their neural representations 3,4,5,6 . If synchrony is important in binding, one would expect that binding and segmentation are facilitated by visual displays that are temporally manipulated to induce stimulus-dependent synchrony. Here we show that visual grouping is indeed facilitated when elements of one percept are presented at the same time as each other and are temporally separated (on a scale below the integration time of the visual system 7 ) from elements of another percept or from background elements. Our results indicate that binding is due to a global mechanism of grouping caused by synchronous neural activation, and not to a local mechanism of motion computation.
Nature – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 30, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.