Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe head injury

Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe head injury Abstract A number of specific methodological issues have arisen in studies of the social, emotional, and behavioural sequelae of head injury. The accounts given by patients and relatives may differ: Patients may lack insight, and relatives – who are often under considerable stress – may themselves give distorted accounts. Moreover, the sequelae of head injury may not all be specific to brain injury but may include effects common to other forms of traumatic injury: The use of control groups may help disentangle specific and non-specific effects. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology Taylor & Francis

Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe head injury

Methodological problems in assessing psychosocial recovery following severe head injury

Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology , Volume 6 (1): 13 – Feb 1, 1984

Abstract

Abstract A number of specific methodological issues have arisen in studies of the social, emotional, and behavioural sequelae of head injury. The accounts given by patients and relatives may differ: Patients may lack insight, and relatives – who are often under considerable stress – may themselves give distorted accounts. Moreover, the sequelae of head injury may not all be specific to brain injury but may include effects common to other forms of traumatic injury: The use of control groups may help disentangle specific and non-specific effects.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/methodological-problems-in-assessing-psychosocial-recovery-following-OaLoU36jD4

References (19)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
0165-0475
DOI
10.1080/01688638408401199
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract A number of specific methodological issues have arisen in studies of the social, emotional, and behavioural sequelae of head injury. The accounts given by patients and relatives may differ: Patients may lack insight, and relatives – who are often under considerable stress – may themselves give distorted accounts. Moreover, the sequelae of head injury may not all be specific to brain injury but may include effects common to other forms of traumatic injury: The use of control groups may help disentangle specific and non-specific effects.

Journal

Journal of Clinical NeuropsychologyTaylor & Francis

Published: Feb 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.