Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Hetherington, N. Wray (1964)
AGGRESSION, NEED FOR SOCIAL APPROVAL, AND HUMOR PREFERENCES.Journal of abnormal psychology, 68
L. Kline (1907)
The Psychology of HumorAmerican Journal of Psychology, 18
F. Redlich, Jacob Levine, Theodore Sohler (1951)
A mirth response test: preliminary report on a psychodiagnostic technique utilizing dynamics of humor.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 21 4
R. Felix (1951)
Mental hygiene as public health practice.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 21 4
J. Morrison (1940)
A Note Concerning Investigations on the Constancy of Audience Laughter, 3
D. Byrne (1956)
The relationship between humor and the expression of hostility.Journal of abnormal psychology, 53 1
J. Doris, E. Fierman (1956)
Humor and anxiety.Journal of abnormal psychology, 53 1
D. Byrne (1958)
Drive Level, Response to Humor, and the Cartoon Sequence EffectPsychological Reports, 4
(1940)
A note concerning investigations in audience laughter
D. Crowne, D. Marlowe (1960)
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of consulting psychology, 24
R. Perl (1933)
The Influence of a Social Factor upon the Appreciation of HumorAmerican Journal of Psychology, 45
J. Strickland (1959)
The effect of motivation arousal on humor preferences.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 59
(1964)
The effects of hostile and social conditions on the appreciation of wit and humor. Unpublished B.A. thesis, I n d~a n a Univer
S. Feshbach (1955)
The drive-reducing function of fantasy behavior.Journal of abnormal psychology, 50 1
H. Wolff, C. Smith, H. Murray (1934)
The psychology of humor.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28
(1953)
An experimental smdy of psychoanalytic theories of humor
(1959)
Humor in review
(1959)
The effects of mouvational arousal on humor preferences
Daniel Katz (1955)
Handbook of Social Psychology.Psychological Bulletin
W. O'connell (1960)
The adaptive functions of wit and humor.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 61
Three studies explored the relative importance of various manipulations of the social environment on appreciation of humor in college males. The experimental situations included hostility-arousal, individual versus group administration, and a laughing versus non-laughing confederate (CE). Overt laughter was more responsive to manipulation than was rating of jokes; however, both responses were clearly influenced. Group administration and laughter by the CE resulted in social facilitation of responsiveness to humor, while hostility-arousal and CE's embarrassment at sex jokes markedly decreased Ss' assessed behavior.
Psychological Reports – SAGE
Published: Aug 31, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.