The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis
The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content...
Riffe, Daniel; Aust, Charles F.; Lacy, Stephen R.
1993-03-01 00:00:00
This study compares 20 sets each of samples of four different sizes (n=7, 14, 21 and 28) using simple random, constructed week and consecutive day samples of newspaper content. Comparisons of sample efficiency, based on the percentage of sample means in each set of 20 falling within one or two standard errors of the population mean, show the superiority of constructed week sampling.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngJournalism QuarterlySAGEhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/the-effectiveness-of-random-consecutive-day-and-constructed-week-O2pUnObh0d
The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis
This study compares 20 sets each of samples of four different sizes (n=7, 14, 21 and 28) using simple random, constructed week and consecutive day samples of newspaper content. Comparisons of sample efficiency, based on the percentage of sample means in each set of 20 falling within one or two standard errors of the population mean, show the superiority of constructed week sampling.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.